Bezodis Ian N, Brazil Adam, von Lieres Und Wilkau Hans C, Wood Matthew A, Paradisis Giorgios P, Hanley Brian, Tucker Catherine B, Pollitt Lysander, Merlino Stéphane, Vazel Pierre-Jean, Walker Josh, Bissas Athanassios
Cardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Front Sports Act Living. 2019 Sep 18;1:23. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2019.00023. eCollection 2019.
The effect of the inclusion of a high hurdle 13.72 m after the start line on elite sprint start and initial acceleration technique has yet to be investigated or understood. This highly novel study addresses that lack of information in an exceptional manner, through detailed biomechanical analysis of the world's best sprint and hurdle athletes, with data collected at the 2018 IAAF World Indoor Championships, held in Birmingham, UK. High speed videos (150 Hz) were compared for eight sprinters and seven hurdlers for the start and initial acceleration phase of the finals of the men's 60 m and 60 m hurdles. Temporal and kinematic data were supplemented by vector coding analysis to investigate mechanisms by which these world-class athletes translate their centres of mass (CM) up to the fourth touchdown post-block exit. The sprinters and hurdlers coordinated their lower limb and trunk movement in a similar manner throughout the start and initial acceleration phases, which contributes new conceptual understanding of the mechanisms that underpin start and initial acceleration performance. Differences between groups were initiated from block set-up, with the hurdlers utilising a larger block spacing, but with the front block nearer to the start line than sprinters. Even after accounting for stature, the biggest differences in the raising of the CM occurred during the block phase, with hurdlers greater than sprinters (difference in vertical CM displacement scaled to stature = -0.037, very large effect size). Subsequent flight phases showed the biggest differences in the translation of the CM, in part due to longer flight times in the hurdlers, whilst the techniques of the two groups generally converged during the ground contact phases of initial acceleration. In highlighting that similar techniques are used by world-class sprinters and hurdlers, despite differing task constraints, this study has provided invaluable insights for scientists, coaches, and athletes, that will inform further developments in understanding and practice across both sprints and hurdles.
起跑线后13.72米处设置高栏对精英短跑运动员的起跑和初始加速技术的影响尚未得到研究或了解。这项极具创新性的研究以独特的方式填补了这一信息空白,通过对世界顶尖短跑和跨栏运动员进行详细的生物力学分析,并收集了在英国伯明翰举行的2018年国际田联世界室内锦标赛的数据。对8名短跑运动员和7名跨栏运动员在男子60米和60米栏决赛起跑和初始加速阶段的高速视频(150赫兹)进行了比较。通过矢量编码分析补充了时间和运动学数据,以研究这些世界级运动员将其质心(CM)向上移动至起跑器后第四次触地的机制。短跑运动员和跨栏运动员在整个起跑和初始加速阶段以相似的方式协调下肢和躯干运动,这为支撑起跑和初始加速表现的机制提供了新的概念性理解。两组之间的差异始于起跑器设置,跨栏运动员使用更大的起跑器间距,但前起跑器比短跑运动员更靠近起跑线。即使考虑到身高因素,质心升高的最大差异也出现在起跑器阶段,跨栏运动员的质心升高幅度大于短跑运动员(垂直质心位移与身高的差值=-0.037,效应量非常大)。随后的腾空阶段显示质心平移的最大差异,部分原因是跨栏运动员的腾空时间更长,而两组的技术在初始加速的地面接触阶段通常趋于一致。这项研究强调,尽管任务限制不同,但世界级短跑运动员和跨栏运动员使用相似的技术,为科学家、教练和运动员提供了宝贵的见解,将为短跑和跨栏项目在理解和实践方面的进一步发展提供参考。