Suppr超能文献

优秀短跑运动员和训练有素的短跑运动员在起跑阶段的运动学和动力学比较。

Kinematic and kinetic comparisons of elite and well-trained sprinters during sprint start.

机构信息

Scientific Expertise Centre, TeamLagardere, Jean Bouin Stadium, Paris, France.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Apr;24(4):896-905. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181ad3448.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the main kinematic, kinetic, and dynamic parameters of elite and well-trained sprinters during the starting block phase and the 2 subsequent steps. Six elite sprinters (10.06-10.43 s/100 m) and 6 well-trained sprinters (11.01-11.80 s/100 m) equipped with 63 passive reflective markers performed 4 maximal 10 m sprint starts on an indoor track. An opto-electronic motion analysis system consisting of 12 digital cameras (250 Hz) was used to record 3D marker trajectories. At the times "on your marks," "set," "clearing the block," and "landing and toe-off of the first and second step," the horizontal position of the center of mass (CM), its velocity (XCM and VCM), and the horizontal position of the rear and front hand (X(Hand_rear) and X(Hand_front)) were calculated. During the pushing phase on the starting block and the 2 first steps, the rate of force development and the impulse (F(impulse)) were also calculated. The main results showed that at each time XCM and VCM were significantly greater in elite sprinters. Moreover, during the pushing phase on the block, the rate of force development and F(impulse) were significantly greater in elite sprinters (respectively, 15,505 +/- 5,397 N.s and 8,459 +/- 3,811 N.s for the rate of force development; 276.2 +/- 36.0 N.s and 215.4 +/- 28.5 N.s for F(impulse), p < or = 0.05). Finally, at the block clearing, elite sprinters showed a greater XHand_rear and X(Hand_front) than well-trained sprinters (respectively, 0.07+/- 0.12 m and -0.27 +/- 0.36 m for X(Hand_rear); 1.00 +/- 0.14 m and 0.52 +/- 0.27 m for X(Hand_front); p < or = 0.05). The muscular strength and arm coordination appear to characterize the efficiency of the sprint start. To improve speed capacities of their athletes, coaches must include in their habitual training sessions of resistance training.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较优秀和训练有素的短跑运动员在起跑器阶段和随后的两步中主要运动学、动力学和动态参数。六名优秀短跑运动员(10.06-10.43 秒/100 米)和六名训练有素的短跑运动员(11.01-11.80 秒/100 米)配备 63 个被动反光标记,在室内跑道上进行了 4 次最大 10 米短跑起跑。一个由 12 台数字摄像机(250Hz)组成的光电运动分析系统用于记录 3D 标记轨迹。在“各就各位”、“预备”、“起跑器腾空”和“第一、二步的着地点和离地瞬间”的时间点,计算质心(CM)的水平位置、速度(XCM 和 VCM)和后手(X(Hand_rear))和前手(X(Hand_front))的水平位置。在起跑器和前两步的推蹬阶段,还计算了力的发展速度和冲量(F(impulse))。主要结果表明,在每个时间点,优秀短跑运动员的 XCM 和 VCM 都显著更大。此外,在起跑器的推蹬阶段,优秀短跑运动员的力的发展速度和 F(impulse)也显著更大(力的发展速度分别为 15505 +/- 5397 N.s 和 8459 +/- 3811 N.s;冲量分别为 276.2 +/- 36.0 N.s 和 215.4 +/- 28.5 N.s,p < or = 0.05)。最后,在起跑器腾空瞬间,优秀短跑运动员的后手(X(Hand_rear))和前手(X(Hand_front))的水平位置都比训练有素的短跑运动员更大(分别为 0.07 +/- 0.12 米和 -0.27 +/- 0.36 米;X(Hand_front));1.00 +/- 0.14 米和 0.52 +/- 0.27 米;p < or = 0.05)。肌肉力量和手臂协调似乎是短跑起跑效率的特征。为了提高运动员的速度能力,教练必须在他们的日常训练中包括力量训练。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验