Robineau Julien, Marrier Bruno, Le Meur Yann, Piscione Julien, Peeters Alexis, Lacome Mathieu
Research Department, Fédération Française de Rugby, Paris, France.
EA6312 Laboratoire de Motricité Humaine Expertise, Sport, Santé, Université de Toulon, Nice, France.
Front Sports Act Living. 2020 Jan 29;1:72. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2019.00072. eCollection 2019.
The objective of this manuscript was to examine the periodization strategy of an international Rugby-7s team during an Olympic season. Training load data were collected in 14 elite male players over a 48-week period during the 2015-2016 Olympic season. The season consisted of 3 macrocycles including: preseason (12-weak duration), in-season (25-weak) fragmented into four 4-7 weeks mesocycles (In-1-4) and the final preparation for the Rio 2016 Olympic Games (Olympic preparation, 11-weak). External training load (TL) such as the total distance (TD), the high-intensity distance (HID) and the number of accelerations performed, was monitored in training and competition over the entire duration of the season using a global positioning system (GPS) devices. The rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was multiplied by the session duration (min) to provide an internal TL (session-RPE) value for all training sessions and competitions. The Olympic preparation may enable planning of higher external TL compared to the preseason (TD, 21 ± 13%, ; total accelerations, 27 ± 4%, ) whereas no difference was observed for internal TL values between these two periods. High-intensity distance (HID) and internal TL (session-RPE) were lower (-11.0 ± 7.8%, and -38 ± 3%, , respectively) during the in-season compared to preseason. Internal TL, TD as well as HID were lower in the third in-season mesocycle (In-3) compared with the first in-season mesocycle (In-1) (-25 ± 12%, ; -32 ± 4%, ; -49 ± 8%, , respectively). The staff managed the workload considering the in-season as the main part of the "Road to Rio." The strategy to reduce the workload at the middle of the season and to induce weeks of regeneration at the end of the in-season was highlighted by the training availability of 100% of the squad at the beginning of the Olympic preparation. The workload periodization strategy of an Olympic season differs from the strategy previously described during a non-Olympic season.
本手稿的目的是研究一支国际七人制橄榄球队在奥运赛季的周期化训练策略。在2015 - 2016奥运赛季的48周内,收集了14名精英男性运动员的训练负荷数据。该赛季包括3个大周期,即:季前赛(为期12周)、赛季中(为期25周),分为四个4 - 7周的中周期(In - 1至In - 4)以及2016年里约奥运会的最后准备阶段(奥运准备期,为期11周)。使用全球定位系统(GPS)设备,在整个赛季的训练和比赛中监测外部训练负荷(TL),如总距离(TD)、高强度距离(HID)和加速次数。将主观用力程度(RPE)评分乘以训练时长(分钟),为所有训练课程和比赛提供内部TL(训练课程 - RPE)值。与季前赛相比,奥运准备期可能使更高外部TL的规划成为可能(TD增加21 ± 13%,总加速次数增加27 ± 4%),而这两个时期的内部TL值未观察到差异。与季前赛相比,赛季中高强度距离(HID)和内部TL(训练课程 - RPE)较低(分别降低 - 11.0 ± 7.8%和 - 38 ± 3%)。与赛季中的第一个中周期(In - 1)相比,第三个中周期(In - 3)的内部TL、TD以及HID较低(分别降低 - 25 ± 12%、 - 32 ± 4%、 - 49 ± 8%)。工作人员将赛季中视为“通往里约之路”的主要部分来管理工作量。在奥运准备期开始时,全队100%的训练可用性突出了在赛季中期减少工作量并在赛季末安排恢复周的策略。奥运赛季的工作量周期化策略与之前描述的非奥运赛季的策略不同。