• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经口内镜甲状腺手术前庭入路视频在开放获取视频分享平台 YouTube 上分享:可靠性、实用性和信息质量评估。

Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Transoral Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Vestibular Approach Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Health Sciences University, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Nov;31(11):1279-1285. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0849. Epub 2020 Dec 21.

DOI:10.1089/lap.2020.0849
PMID:33347791
Abstract

The internet is a broadly preferred source of information both by patients and medical professionals. YouTube™ is a significant information source that may be a useful tool to inform the public, medical students, and residents, and may improve the learning experience if used adequately. In this study, we aimed to estimate the quality and accuracy of videos regarding Transoral Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Vestibular Approach (TOETVA) aired on YouTube, which is the most popular video platform of the online world. We evaluated the first 50 videos, returned by the YouTube research engine, in reply to the "TOETVA" keyword. The popularity of the videos was assessed using the video power index (VPI). The educational quality, accuracy, and transparency of the content regarding TOETVA were estimated by using the DISCERN questionnaire score (DISCERNqs), benchmark criteria (JAMABC), and global quality score (GQSc). The technical quality was ranked through TOETVA Scoring System (TOETVA-SS) by a TOETVA practicioning endocrine surgeon. The content of the videos were about surgical technique with a rate of 68%. According to sources, videos uploaded by physicians had significantly higher DISCERNqs, JAMABC, GQSc, and TOETVA-SS scores. Unlike, videos uploaded by physicians had a lower VPI than videos uploaded by nonmedical sources. The videos of surgical technique had significantly higher DISCERNqs, JAMABC, GQSc, and TOETVA-SS scores. Surgical technique videos also had higher VPI scores than "" videos. Also, negative correlations were found between the VPI (popularity index) and educational value (GQSc), transparency (JAMABC), and technical quality (TOETVA-SS) scores. The data acquired from YouTube videos regarding TOETVA is of below expected quality and reliability. Nevertheless, the educative potential of the online video platform, YouTube, cannot be underestimated.

摘要

互联网是患者和医疗专业人员广泛首选的信息来源。YouTube™是一个重要的信息来源,它可以成为向公众、医学生和住院医师提供信息的有用工具,如果使用得当,还可以改善学习体验。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估在 YouTube 上播放的有关经口内镜甲状腺手术前庭入路(TOETVA)的视频的质量和准确性,YouTube 是互联网上最受欢迎的视频平台。我们评估了 YouTube 搜索引擎回复“TOETVA”关键字的前 50 个视频。使用视频功率指数(VPI)评估视频的受欢迎程度。使用 DISCERN 问卷评分(DISCERNqs)、基准标准(JAMABC)和全球质量评分(GQSc)评估有关 TOETVA 的内容的教育质量、准确性和透明度。通过由 TOETVA 实践内分泌外科医生进行的 TOETVA 评分系统(TOETVA-SS)对技术质量进行排名。视频的内容是关于手术技术的,占 68%。根据来源,医生上传的视频的 DISCERNqs、JAMABC、GQSc 和 TOETVA-SS 评分明显更高。相比之下,医生上传的视频的 VPI 低于非医疗来源上传的视频。手术技术视频的 DISCERNqs、JAMABC、GQSc 和 TOETVA-SS 评分明显更高。“视频”。此外,VPI(受欢迎指数)与教育价值(GQSc)、透明度(JAMABC)和技术质量(TOETVA-SS)评分之间存在负相关关系。从 YouTube 视频中获取的有关 TOETVA 的数据质量和可靠性低于预期。然而,不能低估在线视频平台 YouTube 的教育潜力。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Transoral Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Vestibular Approach Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube.经口内镜甲状腺手术前庭入路视频在开放获取视频分享平台 YouTube 上分享:可靠性、实用性和信息质量评估。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Nov;31(11):1279-1285. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0849. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
2
Evaluation of the reliability, utility, and quality of the information in cardiopulmonary resuscitation videos shared on Open access video sharing platform YouTube.评估在开放获取视频分享平台 YouTube 上分享的心肺复苏术视频的可靠性、实用性和信息质量。
Australas Emerg Care. 2020 Sep;23(3):211-216. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2020.05.005. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
3
Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube.开放获取视频分享平台YouTube上袖状胃切除术视频中信息的可靠性、实用性及质量评估
Obes Surg. 2019 May;29(5):1477-1484. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03738-2.
4
Assessment of the Educational Quality, Accuracy, and Transparency of WebSurg Videos on Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Parathyroidectomy.关于微创视频辅助甲状旁腺切除术的WebSurg视频的教育质量、准确性和透明度评估
Cureus. 2021 Oct 21;13(10):e18942. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18942. eCollection 2021 Oct.
5
Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of the Information on Rotator Cuff Repair on YouTube.评估 YouTube 上有关肩袖修复信息的质量和可靠性。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Feb;106(1):31-34. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.10.004. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
6
Analysis of the quality, reliability, and popularity of information on strabismus on YouTube.分析 YouTube 上斜视相关信息的质量、可靠性和普及度。
Strabismus. 2020 Dec;28(4):175-180. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2020.1836002. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
7
An Analysis of the Quality, Reliability, and Popularity of YouTube Videos on Glaucoma.YouTube 上青光眼相关视频的质量、可靠性和普及度分析。
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022 May-Jun;5(3):306-312. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2021.10.002. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
8
Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of Information on Nutrition After Bariatric Surgery on YouTube.评估 YouTube 上减重手术后营养信息的质量和可靠性。
Obes Surg. 2020 Dec;30(12):4905-4910. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05015-z. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
9
Evaluation of YouTube videos as a patient education source for novel surgical techniques in thyroid surgery.评估YouTube视频作为甲状腺手术新手术技术患者教育资源的情况。
Gland Surg. 2021 Feb;10(2):697-705. doi: 10.21037/gs-20-734.
10
Evaluating the quality, utility, and reliability of the information in uveitis videos shared on YouTube.评估在YouTube上分享的葡萄膜炎视频中信息的质量、实用性和可靠性。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb;43(2):549-555. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02454-8. Epub 2022 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the quality, reliability, and transparency of YouTube videos on spiritual palliative care: a content analysis.评估YouTube上关于灵性姑息治疗视频的质量、可靠性和透明度:一项内容分析。
Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 11;13:1497855. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1497855. eCollection 2025.
2
YouTube as an information source in deep margin elevation: Reliability, accuracy and quality analysis.YouTube作为深部边缘抬高的信息来源:可靠性、准确性和质量分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 7;20(2):e0318568. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318568. eCollection 2025.
3
The World's consumption of free web-based Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery educational resources: A global assessment of video usage trends.
全球对免费在线耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学教育资源的使用情况:视频使用趋势的全球评估。
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2024 Apr 9;9(2):e1246. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1246. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
How humour travels in the new and dynamic mediascape: a case study of a short video platform, Little Red Book, and an online teaching platform, Rain Classroom.幽默如何在新的动态媒体环境中传播:以短视频平台小红书和在线教学平台雨课堂为例
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2023;10(1):318. doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01822-8. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
5
How Reliable Are YouTube Videos for General Surgery Residents Learning?YouTube视频对普通外科住院医师学习的可靠性如何?
Cureus. 2023 Feb 7;15(2):e34718. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34718. eCollection 2023 Feb.