• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估中国秦岭地区野生动物的文化价值:一项选择实验

Estimating the Cultural Value of Wild Animals in the Qinling Mountains, China: A Choice Experiment.

作者信息

Hou Yilei, Liu Tianle, Zhao Zheng, Wen Yali

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China.

College of Tourism, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2020 Dec 17;10(12):2422. doi: 10.3390/ani10122422.

DOI:10.3390/ani10122422
PMID:33348784
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7766759/
Abstract

In this study, we use the choice experiment method to evaluate the value of wild animals in the surrounding areas of the Changqing National Nature Reserve in China. For areas focused on biodiversity conservation, the results of wild animal value evaluation can provide a basis for the formulation of local ecological compensation standards. We identified wild animals, natural landscape features, infrastructure and facilities, and ticket price as major attributes determining the utility and value of the reserve area. The results of our field survey suggest that the cultural value of wild animals is significantly higher than the value of the infrastructure and other natural landscapes. Tourists indicated a willingness-to-pay of 31.4 Yuan to see wild animals in captivity, compared to 71.9 Yuan to see wild animals in the field. Moreover, tourists with different characteristics have different preferences for the cultural value of wildlife. Female tourists have a higher willingness-to-pay than male tourists. In addition, as age, education, and income level increase, tourists' willingness-to-pay also increases. These conclusions can provide a reference for local government to formulate wildlife protection compensation and ecotourism ticket pricing.

摘要

在本研究中,我们运用选择实验法评估了中国长青国家级自然保护区周边地区野生动物的价值。对于注重生物多样性保护的地区,野生动物价值评估结果可为当地生态补偿标准的制定提供依据。我们将野生动物、自然景观特征、基础设施与设施以及门票价格确定为决定保护区效用和价值的主要属性。我们的实地调查结果表明,野生动物的文化价值显著高于基础设施及其他自然景观的价值。游客表示,观看圈养野生动物的支付意愿为31.4元,而观看野外野生动物的支付意愿为71.9元。此外,不同特征的游客对野生动物文化价值的偏好不同。女性游客的支付意愿高于男性游客。此外,随着年龄、教育程度和收入水平的提高,游客的支付意愿也会增加。这些结论可为当地政府制定野生动物保护补偿和生态旅游门票定价提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a898/7766759/df3bfe574f31/animals-10-02422-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a898/7766759/b3dd42b6709c/animals-10-02422-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a898/7766759/df3bfe574f31/animals-10-02422-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a898/7766759/b3dd42b6709c/animals-10-02422-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a898/7766759/df3bfe574f31/animals-10-02422-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Estimating the Cultural Value of Wild Animals in the Qinling Mountains, China: A Choice Experiment.评估中国秦岭地区野生动物的文化价值:一项选择实验
Animals (Basel). 2020 Dec 17;10(12):2422. doi: 10.3390/ani10122422.
2
Examination of tourists' willingness to pay under different conservation scenarios; Evidence from reef manta ray snorkeling in Fiji.不同保护情境下游客支付意愿研究;以斐济礁鲨潜水为例。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 1;13(8):e0198279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198279. eCollection 2018.
3
A comparative study of environmental responsibility behavior in ecotourism from the perceptions of residents and tourists: A case of Qilian Mountains National Park in China.中国祁连山国家公园居民和游客环境责任行为感知的比较研究:以生态旅游为例。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0281119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281119. eCollection 2023.
4
Estimating the recreational value of a coastal wetland park: Application of the choice experiment method and travel cost interval analysis.估算沿海湿地公园的娱乐价值:选择实验法和旅行成本区间分析的应用。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Feb 15;304:114225. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114225. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
5
Visitor's Willingness to Pay for National Park Entrance Fees in China: Evidence from a Contingent Valuation Method.中国游客对国家公园门票价格的支付意愿:基于条件价值评估法的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 20;18(24):13410. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413410.
6
Exploring tourists' preferences and willingness to pay for national park recreation improvements based on regret and utility comparison.基于遗憾和效用比较探讨游客对国家公园娱乐改善的偏好和支付意愿。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 14;14(1):21524. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72494-w.
7
Understanding tourists' preference for mammal species in private protected areas: is there a case for extralimital species for ecotourism?了解游客对私人保护区内哺乳动物物种的偏好:生态旅游引入分布范围以外物种是否可行?
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 5;9(2):e88192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088192. eCollection 2014.
8
Estimation of the monetary value of biodiversity in the Central Alborz Protected Area.估算中央阿尔伯兹保护区生物多样性的货币价值。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(13):19553-19562. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17147-5. Epub 2021 Oct 31.
9
Estimating the Economic Values of Restricted Monoculture Plantations: A Choice Modeling Approach.估算受限单一栽培种植园的经济价值:一种选择建模方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 26;19(15):9073. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159073.
10
Farmers' Heterogeneous Willingness to Pay for Farmland Non-Market Goods and Services on the Basis of a Mixed Logit Model-A Case Study of Wuhan, China.基于混合逻辑模型的农户耕地非市场物品与服务支付意愿异质性研究——以武汉市为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 12;16(20):3876. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16203876.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Well-Being of Farmers Using Ecological Awareness around Protected Areas: Evidence from Qinling Region, China.利用保护区周边的生态意识提高农民福祉:来自中国秦岭地区的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 17;18(18):9792. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189792.
2
European Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Red Meat Labelling Attributes.欧洲消费者对红肉标签属性的支付意愿。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Feb 20;11(2):556. doi: 10.3390/ani11020556.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing restoration benefit of grassland ecosystem incorporating preference heterogeneity empirical data from Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region.结合内蒙古自治区偏好异质性经验数据评估草原生态系统的恢复效益。
Ecol Indic. 2020 Oct;117:106705. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106705. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
2
Diversity and Antimicrobial Activity of Endophytic Fungi Isolated from Sieb in Qinling Mountains, China.中国秦岭南五味子属内生真菌的多样性及抑菌活性。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Aug 19;21(17):5958. doi: 10.3390/ijms21175958.
3
Animal Welfare in Predator Control: Lessons from Land and Sea. How the Management of Terrestrial and Marine Mammals Impacts Wild Animal Welfare in Human-Wildlife Conflict Scenarios in Europe.
捕食者控制中的动物福利:陆地与海洋的经验教训。欧洲陆地和海洋哺乳动物的管理如何在人兽冲突场景中影响野生动物福利。
Animals (Basel). 2020 Jan 29;10(2):218. doi: 10.3390/ani10020218.
4
Assessing Animal Welfare in Animal-Visitor Interactions in Zoos and Other Facilities. A Pilot Study Involving Giraffes.评估动物园及其他场所动物与游客互动中的动物福利。一项涉及长颈鹿的试点研究。
Animals (Basel). 2018 Aug 30;8(9):153. doi: 10.3390/ani8090153.
5
Should the Endangered Status of the Giant Panda Really Be Reduced? The Case of Giant Panda Conservation in Sichuan, China.大熊猫的濒危等级真的应该降低吗?以中国四川大熊猫保护为例。
Animals (Basel). 2018 May 3;8(5):69. doi: 10.3390/ani8050069.
6
Putting a value on injuries to natural assets: The BP oil spill.评估自然资产受损的价值:英国石油公司漏油事件
Science. 2017 Apr 21;356(6335):253-254. doi: 10.1126/science.aam8124.
7
Cultural significance of wild mammals in Mayan and mestizo communities of the Lacandon Rainforest, Chiapas, Mexico.墨西哥恰帕斯州拉坎顿雨林玛雅和梅斯蒂索社区野生哺乳动物的文化意义
J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2015 May 7;11:36. doi: 10.1186/s13002-015-0021-7.
8
Quantifying preferences for the natural world using monetary and nonmonetary assessments of value.使用货币和非货币价值评估来量化对自然世界的偏好。
Conserv Biol. 2014 Apr;28(2):404-13. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12215. Epub 2013 Dec 26.
9
Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services.理解多种生态系统服务之间的关系。
Ecol Lett. 2009 Dec;12(12):1394-404. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
10
Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user's guide.开展离散选择实验以辅助医疗保健决策:用户指南
Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(8):661-77. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004.