Daya S, Ward S
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Fertil Steril. 1988 Jan;49(1):168-70.
The existence of LPD has been controversial, mainly because of inconsistencies in its diagnosis. The endometrial biopsy remains as a gold standard until newer and better tests are developed. Additional information may be provided from serum P determinations in the luteal phase by using the likelihood ratios and positive predictive values obtained in this study. Since the properties of sensitivity and specificity are inversely related, the selection of discriminatory cutoff level of serum P would optimize one at the expense of the other. There is no value that combines both sensitivity and specificity as far as correlation with endometrial biopsy is concerned.
黄体期缺陷(LPD)的存在一直存在争议,主要是因为其诊断存在不一致性。在开发出更新更好的检测方法之前,子宫内膜活检仍是金标准。通过使用本研究中获得的似然比和阳性预测值,黄体期血清孕酮(P)测定可能会提供更多信息。由于敏感性和特异性的特性呈负相关,血清P鉴别临界值的选择会以牺牲另一方为代价来优化其中一方。就与子宫内膜活检的相关性而言,不存在同时兼顾敏感性和特异性的数值。