Ando Wakako, Kamiya Kazutaka, Hayakawa Hideki, Takahashi Masahide, Shoji Nobuyuki
Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Kitasato University, Kanagawa 252-0374, Japan.
Visual Physiology, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Kanagawa 252-0373, Japan.
J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 18;9(12):4090. doi: 10.3390/jcm9124090.
This study aimed to compare the achieved vault using a manufacturer's nomogram and the predicted vault using the currently available prediction formulas after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (EVO Implantable Collamer Lens; ICL, STAAR Surgical) implantation. We included 200 eyes of 100 consecutive patients (mean age ± standard deviation, 34.3 ± 7.8 years) undergoing ICL implantation with a central hole. Three months postoperatively, we quantitatively measured the actual vault, and we compared it with the predicted vault using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (CASIA 2, Tomey). The agreement rate of the recommended ICL size using the manufacturer's nomogram, the NK formula, and the KS formula was 50.0%. The achieved vault was 477.1 ± 263.7 µm, which was significantly smaller than the predicted vaults of 551.2 ± 335.1 and 606.4 ± 212.2 µm, using the NK and KS formulas, respectively (Dunnett test, = 0.014, < 0.001). The achieved vault was not significantly different from the predicted vault using the NK or KS formula ( = 0.386, = 0.157) when selecting a 12.1 mm ICL size. It was not significantly different from the predicted vault using the NK formula ( = 0.962), but it was significantly smaller than that using the KS formula ( = 0.033) when selecting a 12.6 mm size. It was significantly smaller than the predicted vault using the NK and KS formulas ( < 0.001) when selecting 13.2 mm size. The total agreement rate of the recommended ICL size was approximately 50%. The predicted ICL vault tended to overestimate the actual ICL vault, especially when selecting a larger ICL size.
本研究旨在比较后房型有晶体眼人工晶状体(EVO可植入式胶原晶状体;ICL,STAAR Surgical公司)植入术后,使用制造商列线图所获得的房角深度与使用现有预测公式所预测的房角深度。我们纳入了100例连续接受有中央孔ICL植入术患者的200只眼(平均年龄±标准差,34.3±7.8岁)。术后3个月,我们定量测量了实际房角深度,并使用眼前节光学相干断层扫描(CASIA 2,Tomey公司)将其与预测的房角深度进行比较。使用制造商列线图、NK公式和KS公式推荐的ICL尺寸的符合率为50.0%。所获得的房角深度为477.1±263.7µm,分别显著小于使用NK公式和KS公式预测的房角深度551.2±335.1µm和606.4±212.2µm(Dunnett检验,P = 0.014,P < 0.001)。当选择12.1mm的ICL尺寸时,所获得的房角深度与使用NK或KS公式预测的房角深度无显著差异(P = 0.386,P = 0.157)。当选择12.6mm尺寸时,与使用NK公式预测的房角深度无显著差异(P = 0.962),但显著小于使用KS公式预测的房角深度(P = 0.033)。当选择13.2mm尺寸时,显著小于使用NK和KS公式预测的房角深度(P < 0.001)。推荐的ICL尺寸的总符合率约为50%。预测的ICL房角深度往往高估了实际的ICL房角深度,尤其是在选择较大的ICL尺寸时。