J Refract Surg. 2014 May;30(5):354-60. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20140326-01. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
To compare the anterior chamber and anterior chamber angle measurements obtained with spectral-domain anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and time-domain AS-OCT.
The anterior chamber of healthy participants was imaged with spectral-domain AS-OCT (Casia SS-1000; Tomey, Nagoya, Japan) and time-domain AS-OCT (Visante; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA). Central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), angle opening distance at 500 and 750 μm (AOD 500 and AOD 750), trabecular iris space area at 500 and 750 μm (TISA 500 and TISA 750), and scleral spur angle were measured. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated. The Pearson correlation test was used to evaluate the correlation between the measurements and Bland-Altman plots to evaluate the agreement.
One hundred one eyes of 101 healthy participants were analyzed. Excellent repeatability was found with both devices for CCT, AOD 500, AOD 750, TISA 750, and scleral spur angle (ICC = 0.90 to 0.98 and 0.89 to 0.97, respectively) and excellent to moderate repeatability was found for TISA 500 (ICC = 0.68 to 0.97 and 0.70 to 0.93, respectively). For all parameters, Casia and Visante measurements were significantly correlated (r = 0.76 to 0.98; P < .02). ACD measured with the Casia was significantly larger (mean difference = 0.12 ± 0.08 mm; P < .0001), and the scleral spur angle measured with the Casia was significantly lower (mean difference = 4.85° ± 5.30°; P < .01). There were nonsignificant differences between the devices for the other parameters (P > .06).
Both Casia and Visante AS-OCT demonstrate high repeatability. Except for the ACD and scleral spur angles, the two devices show good agreement.
比较应用谱域眼前节光学相干断层扫描(AS-OCT)和时域 AS-OCT 测量前房和前房角的结果。
应用谱域 AS-OCT(Casia SS-1000;Tomey,日本名古屋)和时域 AS-OCT(Visante;Carl Zeiss Meditec,加利福尼亚州都柏林)对健康参与者的前房进行成像。测量中央角膜厚度(CCT)、前房深度(ACD)、500 和 750μm 处的房角开放距离(AOD 500 和 AOD 750)、500 和 750μm 处的小梁虹膜空间面积(TISA 500 和 TISA 750)以及巩膜突角度。计算组内相关系数(ICC)。采用 Pearson 相关检验评估测量值之间的相关性,采用 Bland-Altman 图评估一致性。
分析了 101 名健康参与者的 101 只眼。两种设备对 CCT、AOD 500、AOD 750、TISA 750 和巩膜突角度的重复性均极好(ICC 分别为 0.90 至 0.98 和 0.89 至 0.97),而对 TISA 500 的重复性为极好至中度(ICC 分别为 0.68 至 0.97 和 0.70 至 0.93)。所有参数的 Casia 和 Visante 测量值均显著相关(r = 0.76 至 0.98;P <.02)。Casia 测量的 ACD 明显更大(平均差值=0.12±0.08mm;P <.0001),Casia 测量的巩膜突角度明显更小(平均差值=4.85°±5.30°;P <.01)。两种设备在其他参数上的差异无统计学意义(P >.06)。
Casia 和 Visante AS-OCT 均具有高重复性。除 ACD 和巩膜突角度外,两种设备具有良好的一致性。