Nakai T, Kume K, Yoshikawa H, Oyamada T, Yoshikawa T
Research Center for Veterinary Science, Kitasato Institute, Chiba-Ken, Japan.
Infect Immun. 1988 Jan;56(1):234-40. doi: 10.1128/iai.56.1.234-240.1988.
The interaction of Bordetella bronchiseptica or Pasteurella multocida with swine nasal epithelial cells was studied in vitro. The mean number of B. bronchiseptica organisms adhered per cell was about three times as high as that of P. multocida (P less than 0.01), and the adherence was specifically inhibited by the homologous antiserum prepared with the whole-cell antigen of each bacterium. The poor affinity of P. multocida to the swine nasal mucosa as compared with that of B. bronchiseptica was also demonstrated in the cultured fragments of the nasal mucosa. When observed with a scanning electron microscope, B. bronchiseptica organisms colonized the fragments, whereas few P. multocida organisms adhered. Morphologically, the P. multocida-infected fragments had an essentially normal structure, whereas marked degeneration and marked desquamation of the epithelial cells and severe inflammatory reactions were observed in many areas of the B. bronchiseptica-infected fragments. These morphological observations were consistent with those for the nasal mucosa of P. multocida- or B. bronchiseptica-infected neonatal pigs (T. Nakai, K. Kume, H. Yoshikawa, T. Oyamada, and T. Yoshikawa, Jpn. J. Vet. Sci. 48:693-701, 1986; T. Oyamada, T. Yoshikawa, H. Yoshikawa, M. Shimizu, T. Nakai, and K. Kume, Jpn. J. Vet. Sci. 48:377-387, 1986). Cultured swine nasal fragments, however, were equally injured when they were incubated in a medium containing purified dermonecrotic toxin (DNT) preparations of B. bronchiseptica or P. multocida. Therefore, these DNT preparations can induce morphological damage closely resembling that induced in vivo. Hence, colonization of B. bronchiseptica and production of its DNT on the swine nasal mucosa appear to result in the production of mucosal damage. On the other hand, P. multocida seems to lack the ability to colonize normal swine nasal mucosa, thus resulting in no production or the slight production of DNT to such an extent as to produce mucosal damage. The present data support our previous hypothesis (Nakai et al.; Oyamada et al.) that B. bronchiseptica induces swine atrophic rhinitis, whereas P. multocida does not.
对支气管败血波氏杆菌或多杀性巴氏杆菌与猪鼻上皮细胞的相互作用进行了体外研究。每个细胞上附着的支气管败血波氏杆菌生物体的平均数量约为多杀性巴氏杆菌的三倍(P<0.01),并且这种附着被用每种细菌的全细胞抗原制备的同源抗血清特异性抑制。与支气管败血波氏杆菌相比,多杀性巴氏杆菌对猪鼻黏膜的亲和力较差在鼻黏膜培养片段中也得到了证实。用扫描电子显微镜观察时,支气管败血波氏杆菌生物体定殖在这些片段上,而很少有多杀性巴氏杆菌生物体附着。在形态学上,多杀性巴氏杆菌感染的片段结构基本正常,而在支气管败血波氏杆菌感染的片段的许多区域观察到上皮细胞明显变性和显著脱落以及严重的炎症反应。这些形态学观察结果与多杀性巴氏杆菌或支气管败血波氏杆菌感染的新生仔猪鼻黏膜的观察结果一致(T. Nakai、K. Kume、H. Yoshikawa、T. Oyamada和T. Yoshikawa,《日本兽医科学杂志》48:693 - 701,1986;T. Oyamada、T. Yoshikawa、H. Yoshikawa、M. Shimizu、T. Nakai和K. Kume,《日本兽医科学杂志》48:377 - 387,1986)。然而,当培养的猪鼻片段在含有支气管败血波氏杆菌或多杀性巴氏杆菌纯化皮肤坏死毒素(DNT)制剂的培养基中孵育时,它们受到的损伤是相同的。因此,这些DNT制剂可诱导与体内诱导的损伤非常相似的形态学损伤。因此,支气管败血波氏杆菌在猪鼻黏膜上的定殖及其DNT的产生似乎导致了黏膜损伤的产生。另一方面,多杀性巴氏杆菌似乎缺乏定殖于正常猪鼻黏膜的能力,因此不会产生DNT或产生的DNT量极少以至于不会造成黏膜损伤。目前的数据支持我们之前的假设(Nakai等人;Oyamada等人),即支气管败血波氏杆菌会诱发猪萎缩性鼻炎,而多杀性巴氏杆菌则不会。