Suppr超能文献

理解和应对气候怀疑论的工具包。

A toolkit for understanding and addressing climate scepticism.

机构信息

UQ Business School, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Nov;6(11):1454-1464. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01463-y. Epub 2022 Nov 16.

Abstract

Despite over 50 years of messaging about the reality of human-caused climate change, substantial portions of the population remain sceptical. Furthermore, many sceptics remain unmoved by standard science communication strategies, such as myth busting and evidence building. To understand this, we examine psychological and structural reasons why climate change misinformation is prevalent. First, we review research on motivated reasoning: how interpretations of climate science are shaped by vested interests and ideologies. Second, we examine climate scepticism as a form of political followership. Third, we examine infrastructures of disinformation: the funding, lobbying and political operatives that lend climate scepticism its power. Guiding this Review are two principles: (1) to understand scepticism, one must account for the interplay between individual psychologies and structural forces; and (2) global data are required to understand this global problem. In the spirit of optimism, we finish by describing six strategies for reducing the destructive influence of climate scepticism.

摘要

尽管已经有 50 多年的时间在传播人类造成的气候变化的现实,但仍有相当一部分人持怀疑态度。此外,许多怀疑论者仍然不为标准的科学传播策略所动,例如破除神话和建立证据。为了理解这一点,我们研究了为什么气候变化错误信息如此普遍的心理和结构原因。首先,我们回顾了关于动机推理的研究:气候科学的解释是如何受到既得利益和意识形态的影响的。其次,我们将气候怀疑论视为一种政治追随的形式。第三,我们研究了虚假信息的基础设施:为气候怀疑论提供力量的资金、游说和政治活动。指导这篇综述的有两个原则:(1)要理解怀疑论,就必须考虑个人心理和结构力量之间的相互作用;(2)需要全球数据来理解这个全球性问题。本着乐观的精神,我们最后描述了六种减少气候怀疑论破坏性影响的策略。

相似文献

1
A toolkit for understanding and addressing climate scepticism.理解和应对气候怀疑论的工具包。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Nov;6(11):1454-1464. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01463-y. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
2
Climate Change Disinformation and How to Combat It.气候变化相关虚假信息及应对措施
Annu Rev Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;42:1-21. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102409. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
7
Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate Change.让公众免受关于气候变化的错误信息的影响。
Glob Chall. 2017 Jan 23;1(2):1600008. doi: 10.1002/gch2.201600008. eCollection 2017 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

5
Public agreement with misinformation about wind farms.公众对风电场的错误信息达成共识。
Nat Commun. 2024 Oct 15;15(1):8888. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53278-2.
9
Toolbox of individual-level interventions against online misinformation.个体层面干预网络错误信息工具箱。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Jun;8(6):1044-1052. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01881-0. Epub 2024 May 13.

本文引用的文献

2
Worldview-motivated rejection of science and the norms of science.受世界观驱动而对科学和科学规范的排斥。
Cognition. 2021 Oct;215:104820. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104820. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
3
The general fault in our fault lines.我们断层线上的普遍故障。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Oct;5(10):1369-1380. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01092-x. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
4
Climate Change Disinformation and How to Combat It.气候变化相关虚假信息及应对措施
Annu Rev Public Health. 2021 Apr 1;42:1-21. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102409. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
9
Social norms as solutions.作为解决方案的社会规范。
Science. 2016 Oct 7;354(6308):42-43. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf8317.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验