UQ Business School, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Nov;6(11):1454-1464. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01463-y. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
Despite over 50 years of messaging about the reality of human-caused climate change, substantial portions of the population remain sceptical. Furthermore, many sceptics remain unmoved by standard science communication strategies, such as myth busting and evidence building. To understand this, we examine psychological and structural reasons why climate change misinformation is prevalent. First, we review research on motivated reasoning: how interpretations of climate science are shaped by vested interests and ideologies. Second, we examine climate scepticism as a form of political followership. Third, we examine infrastructures of disinformation: the funding, lobbying and political operatives that lend climate scepticism its power. Guiding this Review are two principles: (1) to understand scepticism, one must account for the interplay between individual psychologies and structural forces; and (2) global data are required to understand this global problem. In the spirit of optimism, we finish by describing six strategies for reducing the destructive influence of climate scepticism.
尽管已经有 50 多年的时间在传播人类造成的气候变化的现实,但仍有相当一部分人持怀疑态度。此外,许多怀疑论者仍然不为标准的科学传播策略所动,例如破除神话和建立证据。为了理解这一点,我们研究了为什么气候变化错误信息如此普遍的心理和结构原因。首先,我们回顾了关于动机推理的研究:气候科学的解释是如何受到既得利益和意识形态的影响的。其次,我们将气候怀疑论视为一种政治追随的形式。第三,我们研究了虚假信息的基础设施:为气候怀疑论提供力量的资金、游说和政治活动。指导这篇综述的有两个原则:(1)要理解怀疑论,就必须考虑个人心理和结构力量之间的相互作用;(2)需要全球数据来理解这个全球性问题。本着乐观的精神,我们最后描述了六种减少气候怀疑论破坏性影响的策略。