Suppr超能文献

胼胝体角和 Evans 指数在轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默病中的鉴别诊断价值。

The Differential Diagnostic Value of the Callosal Angle and Evans Index in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.

Department of Radiology, Hainan Hospital of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Sanya 572013, China.

出版信息

Curr Med Imaging. 2021;17(7):889-896. doi: 10.2174/1573405616666201223150004.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Callosal Angle (CA) and Evans Index (EI) are considered as imaging biomarkers to diagnose normal-pressure hydrocephalus using traditional MR measurement methods.

OBJECTIVE

The current study aimed to evaluate the differential diagnostic value of CA and EI in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's Disease (AD).

METHODS

Five-hundred and two subjects were selected from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database, which included 168 Normal Controls (NC), 233 MCI and 101 AD patients. The structural MR images were interactively applied with multiplanar reconstruction to measure the CA and EI.

RESULTS

CA presented no significant difference among NC, MCI and AD groups (H value = 3.848, P value = 0.146), and EI demonstrated higher value in MCI and AD groups than that in NC groups (P = 0.000 and 0.001, respectively). MCI group had significant larger EI (0.29±0.04) than (0.27±0.03) NC group in 70-75 years old sub-groups. ROC showed that the area under the curve was 0.704±0.045 for NC-MCI in 70-75 years old groups. The correlation analysis indicated that EI was significantly negatively related to MMSE scores of MCI patients (r = -0.131, P = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

EI might serve as a screening imaging biomarker for MCI in 70-75 years old patients, and show limited differential value for the diagnosis of AD. CA could present no diagnostic value for MCI and AD in the current study.

摘要

背景

胼胝体角(CA)和埃文斯指数(EI)被认为是使用传统磁共振测量方法诊断正常压力脑积水的影像学标志物。

目的

本研究旨在评估 CA 和 EI 在轻度认知障碍(MCI)和阿尔茨海默病(AD)中的鉴别诊断价值。

方法

从阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议(ADNI)数据库中选择了 502 名受试者,包括 168 名正常对照(NC)、233 名 MCI 和 101 名 AD 患者。使用多平面重建对结构磁共振图像进行交互式应用,以测量 CA 和 EI。

结果

CA 在 NC、MCI 和 AD 组之间无显著差异(H 值=3.848,P 值=0.146),而 EI 在 MCI 和 AD 组中高于 NC 组(P=0.000 和 0.001)。70-75 岁亚组中,MCI 组的 EI(0.29±0.04)明显大于 NC 组(0.27±0.03)。ROC 显示 70-75 岁 NC-MCI 的曲线下面积为 0.704±0.045。相关性分析表明,EI 与 MCI 患者的 MMSE 评分呈显著负相关(r=-0.131,P=0.046)。

结论

EI 可能成为 70-75 岁 MCI 患者的筛查影像学标志物,对 AD 的诊断显示出有限的鉴别价值。在本研究中,CA 对 MCI 和 AD 均无诊断价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30e0/8811612/17b80f28391c/CMIM-17-889_F1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验