• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众在 COVID-19 期间对稀缺医疗资源分配的偏好。

General Public Preferences for Allocating Scarce Medical Resources During COVID-19.

机构信息

Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.

University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, United States.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2020 Dec 11;8:587423. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.587423. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2020.587423
PMID:33363084
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7759519/
Abstract

COVID-19 has overwhelmed healthcare systems across the globe with an unprecedented surge in the demand for hospitalizations. Consequently, many hospitals are facing precarious conditions due to limited capacity, especially in the provision of ventilators. The governing ethical principles of medical practice delineated in (1) favor prioritizing younger patients, largely because of their relatively higher expected life years. We conduct a survey of the general public in the United States to elicit their preferences for the allocation of a limited number of ventilators. The results show that the general public views align with the established ethical principles, which favor younger patients. : C91.

摘要

COVID-19 导致全球对住院治疗的需求空前激增,使医疗系统不堪重负。因此,许多医院由于容量有限,特别是在提供呼吸机方面,面临着不稳定的局面。(1)中规定的医疗实践的基本伦理原则优先考虑年轻患者,主要是因为他们相对较高的预期寿命。我们对美国的普通公众进行了一项调查,以了解他们对有限数量的呼吸机分配的偏好。结果表明,公众的观点与既定的伦理原则一致,即优先考虑年轻患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa34/7759519/e82c68d8247c/fpubh-08-587423-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa34/7759519/e82c68d8247c/fpubh-08-587423-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa34/7759519/e82c68d8247c/fpubh-08-587423-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
General Public Preferences for Allocating Scarce Medical Resources During COVID-19.公众在 COVID-19 期间对稀缺医疗资源分配的偏好。
Front Public Health. 2020 Dec 11;8:587423. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.587423. eCollection 2020.
2
The Toughest Triage - Allocating Ventilators in a Pandemic.最艰难的分诊——在大流行中分配呼吸机
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):1973-1975. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2005689. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
3
Principled decisions and virtuous care: an ethical assessment of the SIAARTI Guidelines for allocating intensive care resources.有原则的决策和高尚的关怀:对 SIAARTI 重症监护资源分配指南的伦理评估。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2020 Aug;86(8):872-876. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14691-1. Epub 2020 May 28.
4
Against Personal Ventilator Reallocation.反对个人呼吸机重新分配。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2021 Apr;30(2):272-284. doi: 10.1017/S0963180120000833. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
5
Allocation of scarce resources during the COVID-19 pandemic: a Jewish ethical perspective.COVID-19 大流行期间稀缺资源的分配:犹太伦理视角。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Jul;46(7):444-446. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106242. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
6
Age, "Life-Cycles," and the Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources.年龄、“生命周期”与稀缺医疗资源的分配
Chest. 2020 Nov;158(5):1837-1838. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.06.019. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
7
Allocation of Mechanical Ventilators During a Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Study of Perceptions Among Japanese Health Care Workers and the General Public.大流行期间机械通气设备的分配:日本医护人员和公众对其认知的混合方法研究。
Chest. 2021 Jun;159(6):2494-2502. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.01.015. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
8
A Framework for Rationing Ventilators and Critical Care Beds During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间呼吸机及重症监护床位分配框架
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1773-1774. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.5046.
9
Saving the most lives-A comparison of European triage guidelines in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.拯救最多生命——COVID-19 大流行背景下的欧洲分诊指南比较。
Bioethics. 2021 Feb;35(2):125-134. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12836. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
10
Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19.新冠疫情期间稀缺医疗资源的公平分配
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):2049-2055. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb2005114. Epub 2020 Mar 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients' perspectives on ethical principles to fairly allocate scarce surgical resources during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands: a Q-methodology study.荷兰 COVID-19 大流行期间公平分配稀缺外科资源的伦理原则:一项 Q 方法学研究 。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 23;14(9):e086681. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086681.
2
Health Professional vs Layperson Values and Preferences on Scarce Resource Allocation.医疗专业人员与非专业人员在稀缺资源分配上的价值观和偏好
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e241958. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.1958.
3
Patients' rights in physicians' practice during Covid-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study in Romania.

本文引用的文献

1
Hospital Capacity and Operations in the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic-Planning for the Nth Patient.2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间的医院容量与运营——为第N位患者做准备
JAMA Health Forum. 2020 Mar 2;1(3):e200345. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2020.0345.
2
Disability, Disablism, and COVID-19 Pandemic Triage.残疾、残疾歧视与 COVID-19 大流行分诊。
J Bioeth Inq. 2020 Dec;17(4):601-605. doi: 10.1007/s11673-020-10005-y. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
3
Ethical dilemmas due to the Covid-19 pandemic.由新冠疫情引发的伦理困境。
新冠疫情期间医生执业中的患者权利:罗马尼亚的一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Jul 26;24(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00935-8.
4
Public voices on tie-breaking criteria and underlying values in COVID-19 triage protocols to access critical care: a scoping review.关于新冠疫情重症监护分诊方案中打破平局标准及潜在价值观的公众声音:一项范围综述
Discov Health Syst. 2023;2(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s44250-023-00027-9. Epub 2023 May 10.
5
Documentary Assessment of the Abilities of Kyrgyzstan's Research Ethics Committees During Public Health Emergency and Non-Emergency Situations.在公共卫生紧急和非紧急情况下,对吉尔吉斯斯坦研究伦理委员会能力的文献评估。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2023 Jul;18(3):99-108. doi: 10.1177/15562646231176711. Epub 2023 May 18.
6
Community preferences for the allocation of scarce healthcare resources during the COVID-19 pandemic: a review of the literature.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,对稀缺医疗资源分配的社区偏好:文献综述。
Public Health. 2022 Aug;209:75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.06.004. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
7
Exploring the roles of trust and social group preference on the legitimacy of algorithmic decision-making vs. human decision-making for allocating COVID-19 vaccinations.探索信任和社会群体偏好对新冠疫苗分配中算法决策与人类决策合法性的作用。
AI Soc. 2022 Apr 21:1-19. doi: 10.1007/s00146-022-01412-3.
8
Public Opinion on Priorities Toward Fair Allocation of Ventilators During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Nationwide Survey.公众对 COVID-19 大流行期间公平分配呼吸机的优先事项的意见:一项全国性调查。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 14;9:753048. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.753048. eCollection 2021.
9
Whom Should Be Saved? A Proposed Ethical Framework for Allocating Scarce Medical Resources to COVID-19 Patients Using Fuzzy Logic.应该拯救谁?一个关于运用模糊逻辑为新冠肺炎患者分配稀缺医疗资源的伦理框架建议。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Mar 22;8:600415. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.600415. eCollection 2021.
10
Laypersons' Priority-Setting Preferences for Allocating a COVID-19 Patient to a Ventilator: Does a Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease Matter?非专业人士在为 COVID-19 患者分配呼吸机时的优先排序偏好:阿尔茨海默病的诊断是否重要?
Clin Interv Aging. 2020 Dec 23;15:2407-2414. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S283015. eCollection 2020.
Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Jun 17;10(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00702-7.
4
Letter: The Resiliency of the Neurosurgeon in the Midst of COVID-19 Pandemic Storm: The Italian Experience From the Frontline.信函:新冠疫情风暴中的神经外科医生的韧性:来自前线的意大利经验
Neurosurgery. 2020 Aug 1;87(2):E227-E228. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa180.
5
Recommendations for prioritization, treatment, and triage of breast cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. the COVID-19 pandemic breast cancer consortium.COVID-19 大流行期间乳腺癌患者的优先排序、治疗和分诊建议。COVID-19 大流行乳腺癌联盟。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jun;181(3):487-497. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05644-z. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
6
A Framework for Rationing Ventilators and Critical Care Beds During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间呼吸机及重症监护床位分配框架
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1773-1774. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.5046.
7
Critical Supply Shortages - The Need for Ventilators and Personal Protective Equipment during the Covid-19 Pandemic.关键物资短缺——新冠疫情期间对呼吸机和个人防护装备的需求
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):e41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2006141. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
8
Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19.新冠疫情期间稀缺医疗资源的公平分配
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):2049-2055. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb2005114. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
9
The Simple Triage Scoring System (STSS) successfully predicts mortality and critical care resource utilization in H1N1 pandemic flu: a retrospective analysis.简单分诊评分系统 (STSS) 可成功预测 H1N1 大流行流感的死亡率和重症监护资源利用情况:一项回顾性分析。
Crit Care. 2011;15(1):R39. doi: 10.1186/cc10001. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
10
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.自由主义者和保守主义者依赖不同的道德基础。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 May;96(5):1029-46. doi: 10.1037/a0015141.