Vaara Jani P, Vasankari Tommi, Wyss Thomas, Pihlainen Kai, Ojanen Tommi, Raitanen Jani, Vähä-Ypyä Henri, Kyröläinen Heikki
Department of Leadership and Military Pedagogy, National Defence University, Helsinki, Finland.
The UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Tampere, Finland.
Front Sports Act Living. 2020 Dec 18;2:587789. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2020.587789. eCollection 2020.
Physical activity and sedentary time may associate with physical fitness and body composition. Yet, there exists some observational studies that have investigated the associations of device-based measures of sedentary time and physical activity (PA) with cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and body composition but associations with muscular fitness (MF) are less studied. Objective sedentary time and physical activity was measured by a hip worn accelerometer from 415 young adult men (age: mean 26, standard deviation 7 years). Cardiorespiratory fitness (VOmax) (CRF) was determined using a graded cycle ergometer test until exhaustion. Maximal force of lower extremities was measured isometrically and lower body power was assessed using standing long jump (MF). Body composition was determined with bioimpedance method. Single and compositional approach was used in regression analysis. Mean sedentary time was 707 (standard deviation 133) minutes per day (77 ± 8% of the wear time). Volumes of all PA intensities were positively associated with CRF and associations showed linearly increasing magnitudes with higher intensities in single regression models adjusted for age and smoking ( < 0.001). Similarly, PA intensities were positively associated with lower body MF, however, with weaker associations ( < 0.005). After further adjustment for resistance training, the associations remained significant. The associations of the relative distribution of time within sedentary behavior (SB), light intensity PA (LPA) and moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) behaviors as a whole with using compositional analysis further revealed that within the composition MVPA and SB were positively associated with CRF and MF ( < 0.001), while LPA was not. In addition, within the composition, accumulated PA bouts lasting more than 3 min were consistently associated with CRF and MF, and with all body composition variables ( < 0.001), while sedentary time was associated with body fat percentage ( < 0.001). Promoting physical activity and reducing sedentary time may have positive influence on physical fitness and body fat content, and thereby may offer positive health effects. Physical activity of higher intensities may offer greater benefits.
身体活动和久坐时间可能与身体素质和身体成分相关。然而,一些观察性研究调查了基于设备测量的久坐时间和身体活动(PA)与心肺适能(CRF)和身体成分之间的关联,但与肌肉适能(MF)的关联研究较少。通过佩戴在髋部的加速度计测量了415名年轻成年男性(年龄:平均26岁,标准差7岁)的客观久坐时间和身体活动。使用分级自行车测力计测试至力竭来确定心肺适能(最大摄氧量,VOmax)(CRF)。等长测量下肢最大力量,并使用立定跳远评估下肢力量(MF)。用生物电阻抗法测定身体成分。回归分析采用单变量和成分分析方法。平均久坐时间为每天707(标准差133)分钟(占佩戴时间的77±8%)。在调整年龄和吸烟因素的单变量回归模型中,所有身体活动强度的量均与CRF呈正相关,且随着强度增加,关联呈线性增强(P<0.001)。同样,身体活动强度与下肢MF呈正相关,但关联较弱(P<0.005)。进一步调整抗阻训练后,这些关联仍然显著。使用成分分析进一步揭示了久坐行为(SB)、低强度身体活动(LPA)和中等到高强度身体活动(MVPA)行为中时间的相对分布与CRF和MF的整体关联,结果显示,在成分中,MVPA和SB与CRF和MF呈正相关(P<0.001),而LPA则不然。此外,在成分中,持续超过3分钟的累积身体活动 bout 与CRF和MF以及所有身体成分变量均始终呈正相关(P<0.001),而久坐时间与体脂百分比呈正相关(P<0.001)。促进身体活动和减少久坐时间可能对身体素质和体脂含量产生积极影响,从而可能带来积极的健康效益。更高强度的身体活动可能带来更大益处。