Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Mar 18;28(4):685-694. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa293.
Open notes invite patients and families to read ambulatory visit notes through the patient portal. Little is known about the extent to which they identify and speak up about perceived errors. Understanding the barriers to speaking up can inform quality improvements.
To describe patient and family attitudes, experiences, and barriers related to speaking up about perceived serious note errors.
Mixed method analysis of a 2016 electronic survey of patients and families at 2 northeast US academic medical centers. Participants had active patient portal accounts and at least 1 note available in the preceding 12 months.
6913 adult patients (response rate 28%) and 3672 pediatric families (response rate 17%) completed the survey. In total, 8724/9392 (93%) agreed that reporting mistakes improves patient safety. Among 8648 participants who read a note, 1434 (17%) perceived ≥1 mistake. 627/1434 (44%) reported the mistake was serious and 342/627 (56%) contacted their provider. Participants who self-identified as Black or African American, Asian, "other," or "multiple" race(s) (OR 0.50; 95% CI (0.26,0.97)) or those who reported poorer health (OR 0.58; 95% CI (0.37,0.90)) were each less likely to speak up than white or healthier respondents, respectively. The most common barriers to speaking up were not knowing how to report a mistake (61%) and avoiding perception as a "troublemaker" (34%). Qualitative analysis of 476 free-text suggestions revealed practical recommendations and proposed innovations for partnering with patients and families.
About half of patients and families who perceived a serious mistake in their notes reported it. Identified barriers demonstrate modifiable issues such as establishing clear mechanisms for reporting and more challenging issues such as creating a supportive culture. Respondents offered new ideas for engaging patients and families in improving note accuracy.
开放病历允许患者和家属通过患者门户阅读门诊就诊记录。对于他们识别和提出感知到的错误的程度知之甚少。了解阻碍发言的因素可以为质量改进提供信息。
描述患者和家属与提出感知到的严重记录错误相关的态度、经验和障碍。
对 2016 年美国东北部 2 家学术医疗中心的患者和家属进行的电子调查进行混合方法分析。参与者拥有活跃的患者门户账户,并且在过去 12 个月内至少有 1 份记录可用。
共有 6913 名成年患者(回应率 28%)和 3672 名儿科家庭(回应率 17%)完成了调查。共有 9392 名参与者中的 8724 名(93%)同意报告错误可提高患者安全性。在阅读记录的 8648 名参与者中,有 1434 名(17%)认为至少有 1 个错误。627/1434(44%)报告错误很严重,342/627(56%)联系了他们的提供者。自我认定为黑人或非裔美国人、亚洲人、“其他”或“多种”种族(OR 0.50;95%CI(0.26,0.97))或报告健康状况较差的参与者(OR 0.58;95%CI(0.37,0.90))比白人或健康状况较好的参与者更不可能发言。发言的最常见障碍是不知道如何报告错误(61%)和避免被视为“麻烦制造者”(34%)。对 476 份自由文本建议的定性分析揭示了与患者和家属合作的切实可行的建议和创新。
约一半感知到记录错误的患者和家属报告了错误。确定的障碍表明可以解决一些可调整的问题,例如建立明确的报告机制,以及一些更具挑战性的问题,例如营造一个支持性的文化。受访者提出了新的想法,以让患者和家属参与提高记录准确性。