• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者门户网站上的就诊记录对教育程度较低或非白人患者参与医疗的重要性:调查研究

The Importance of Visit Notes on Patient Portals for Engaging Less Educated or Nonwhite Patients: Survey Study.

作者信息

Gerard Macda, Chimowitz Hannah, Fossa Alan, Bourgeois Fabienne, Fernandez Leonor, Bell Sigall K

机构信息

Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, United States.

Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 24;20(5):e191. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9196.

DOI:10.2196/jmir.9196
PMID:29793900
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5992450/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

OpenNotes, a national initiative to share clinicians' visit notes with patients, can improve patient engagement, but effects on vulnerable populations are not known very well.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim is to examine the importance of visit notes to nonwhite and less educated patients.

METHODS

Patients at an urban academic medical center with an active patient portal account and ≥1 available ambulatory visit note over the prior year were surveyed during June 2016 until September 2016. The survey was designed with patients and families and assessed importance of reading notes (scale 0-10) for (1) understanding health conditions, (2) feeling informed about care, (3) understanding the provider's thought process, (4) remembering the plan of care, and (5) making decisions about care. We compared the proportion of patients reporting 9-10 (extremely important) for each item stratified by education level, race/ethnicity, and self-reported health. Principal component analysis and correlation measures supported a summary score for the 5 items (Cronbach alpha=.93). We examined factors associated with rating notes as extremely important to engage in care using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 24,722 patients, 6913 (27.96%) completed the survey. The majority (6736/6913, 97.44%) read at least one note. Among note readers, 74.0% (727/982) of patients with ≤high school education, 70.7% (130/184) of black patients, and 69.9% (153/219) of Hispanic/Latino patients reported that notes are extremely important to feel informed about their care. The majority of less educated and nonwhite patients reported notes as extremely important to remember the care plan (62.4%, 613/982 ≤high school education; 62.0%, 114/184 black patients; and 61.6%, 135/219 Hispanic/Latino patients) and to make care decisions (62.3%, 612/982; 59.8%, 110/184; and 58.5%, 128/219, respectively, and P<.003 for all comparisons to more educated and white patients, respectively). Among patients with the poorest self-reported health, 65.9% (499/757) found notes extremely important to be informed and to understand the provider. On multivariable modeling, less educated patients were nearly three times as likely to report notes were extremely important to engage in care compared with the most educated patients (odds ratio [OR] 2.9, 95% CI 2.4-3.3). Nonwhite patients were twice as likely to report the same compared with white patients (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.5-2.7 [black] and OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.6-2.9 [Hispanic/Latino and Asian], P<.001 for each comparison). Healthier patients, women, older patients, and those who read more notes were more likely to find notes extremely important to engage in care.

CONCLUSIONS

Less educated and nonwhite patients using the portal each assigned higher importance to reading notes for several health behaviors than highly educated and white patients, and may find transparent notes especially valuable for understanding their health and engaging in their care. Facilitating access to notes may improve engagement in health care for some vulnerable populations who have historically been more challenging to reach.

摘要

背景

“开放病历”是一项让临床医生与患者共享就诊记录的全国性倡议,它可以提高患者的参与度,但对弱势群体的影响尚不清楚。

目的

我们的目的是研究就诊记录对非白人和受教育程度较低患者的重要性。

方法

2016年6月至2016年9月期间,对一家城市学术医疗中心拥有活跃患者门户网站账户且上一年至少有1份门诊就诊记录的患者进行了调查。该调查是与患者及其家属共同设计的,评估了阅读记录对于(1)了解健康状况、(2)了解护理情况、(3)理解医生的思维过程、(4)记住护理计划以及(5)做出护理决策的重要性(0-10分制)。我们比较了按教育程度、种族/民族和自我报告的健康状况分层的患者中,对每个项目报告9-10分(极其重要)的比例。主成分分析和相关性测量支持了这5个项目的综合得分(Cronbach α = 0.93)。我们使用逻辑回归分析了与将记录评为对参与护理极其重要相关的因素。

结果

在24722名患者中,6913名(27.96%)完成了调查。大多数(6736/6913,97.44%)阅读了至少一份记录。在阅读记录的患者中,高中及以下学历患者中有74.0%(727/982)、黑人患者中有70.7%(130/184)、西班牙裔/拉丁裔患者中有69.9%(153/219)表示记录对于了解他们的护理情况极其重要。大多数受教育程度较低和非白人患者表示记录对于记住护理计划(62.4%,613/982高中及以下学历;62.0%,114/184黑人患者;61.6%,135/219西班牙裔/拉丁裔患者)和做出护理决策(分别为62.3%,612/982;59.8%,110/184;58.5%,128/219,与受教育程度较高和白人患者的所有比较P<0.003)极其重要。在自我报告健康状况最差的患者中,65.9%(499/757)认为记录对于了解情况和理解医生极其重要。在多变量模型中,与受教育程度最高的患者相比,受教育程度较低的患者报告记录对于参与护理极其重要的可能性几乎是其三倍(优势比[OR]2.9,95%可信区间2.4-3.3)。与白人患者相比,非白人患者报告同样情况的可能性是其两倍(OR 2.0,95%可信区间1.5-2.7[黑人]和OR 2.2,95%可信区间1.6-2.9[西班牙裔/拉丁裔和亚裔],每次比较P<0.001)。健康状况较好的患者、女性、老年患者以及阅读记录较多的患者更有可能认为记录对于参与护理极其重要。

结论

使用门户网站的受教育程度较低和非白人患者在几种健康行为方面对阅读记录的重视程度高于受教育程度较高和白人患者,并且可能发现透明的记录对于了解他们的健康状况和参与护理特别有价值。促进获取记录可能会提高一些历史上更难接触到的弱势群体对医疗保健的参与度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abb8/5992450/428a1c7c9bce/jmir_v20i5e191_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abb8/5992450/428a1c7c9bce/jmir_v20i5e191_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abb8/5992450/428a1c7c9bce/jmir_v20i5e191_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
The Importance of Visit Notes on Patient Portals for Engaging Less Educated or Nonwhite Patients: Survey Study.患者门户网站上的就诊记录对教育程度较低或非白人患者参与医疗的重要性:调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 24;20(5):e191. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9196.
2
OpenNotes After 7 Years: Patient Experiences With Ongoing Access to Their Clinicians' Outpatient Visit Notes.7年后的开放病历:患者持续获取临床医生门诊病历记录的体验
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 6;21(5):e13876. doi: 10.2196/13876.
3
Frequency and Types of Patient-Reported Errors in Electronic Health Record Ambulatory Care Notes.电子健康记录门诊护理记录中患者报告错误的频率和类型。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e205867. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5867.
4
Tackling Ambulatory Safety Risks Through Patient Engagement: What 10,000 Patients and Families Say About Safety-Related Knowledge, Behaviors, and Attitudes After Reading Visit Notes.通过患者参与解决门诊安全风险:10000 名患者及其家属在阅读就诊记录后对安全相关知识、行为和态度的看法。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e791-e799. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000494.
5
How do older patients with chronic conditions view reading open visit notes?患有慢性病的老年患者如何看待阅读开放式就诊记录?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021 Dec;69(12):3497-3506. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17406. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
6
Empowering Informal Caregivers with Health Information: OpenNotes as a Safety Strategy.为非正式护理人员提供健康信息:将开放病历作为一种安全策略。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018 Mar;44(3):130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.09.004.
7
Speaking up about patient-perceived serious visit note errors: Patient and family experiences and recommendations.患者感知的严重就诊记录错误:患者和家属的经历及建议。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Mar 18;28(4):685-694. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa293.
8
Patients' Experiences of Web-Based Access to Electronic Health Records in Finland: Cross-sectional Survey.芬兰患者对基于网络的电子健康记录访问的体验:横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jun 6;24(6):e37438. doi: 10.2196/37438.
9
Differences in Access to and Preferences for Using Patient Portals and Other eHealth Technologies Based on Race, Ethnicity, and Age: A Database and Survey Study of Seniors in a Large Health Plan.基于种族、族裔和年龄的患者门户网站及其他电子健康技术的使用机会和偏好差异:一项针对大型健康计划中老年人的数据库及调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 4;18(3):e50. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5105.
10
OpenNotes and shared decision making: a growing practice in clinical transparency and how it can support patient-centered care.开放病历和共同决策:临床透明度日益增长的实践以及它如何支持以患者为中心的护理。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Sep 1;25(9):1153-1159. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy083.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Experiences and Perspectives When MyChart is Introduced in a Large Community Hospital: Mixed Methods Study.在大型社区医院引入MyChart时患者的体验与观点:混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 23;27:e66353. doi: 10.2196/66353.
2
Guidelines for Patient-Centered Documentation in the Era of Open Notes: Qualitative Study.开放病历时代以患者为中心的文档记录指南:定性研究
JMIR Med Educ. 2025 Jan 20;11:e59301. doi: 10.2196/59301.
3
Affordance trajectories and the usefulness of online records access among older adults in Sweden.

本文引用的文献

1
Empowering Informal Caregivers with Health Information: OpenNotes as a Safety Strategy.为非正式护理人员提供健康信息:将开放病历作为一种安全策略。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018 Mar;44(3):130-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.09.004.
2
The Association of Patient Factors, Digital Access, and Online Behavior on Sustained Patient Portal Use: A Prospective Cohort of Enrolled Users.患者因素、数字接入与在线行为对患者持续使用患者门户网站的影响:一项针对注册用户的前瞻性队列研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Oct 17;19(10):e345. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7895.
3
What Patients Value About Reading Visit Notes: A Qualitative Inquiry of Patient Experiences With Their Health Information.
瑞典老年人的可供性轨迹与在线记录访问的实用性
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 21;10:20552076241287354. doi: 10.1177/20552076241287354. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
The Effect of Using a Client-Accessible Health Record on Perceived Quality of Care: Interview Study Among Parents and Adolescents.使用客户可访问的健康记录对感知医疗质量的影响:家长和青少年访谈研究
J Particip Med. 2024 Apr 23;16:e50092. doi: 10.2196/50092.
5
Biomedical text readability after hypernym substitution with fine-tuned large language models.使用微调大语言模型进行上位词替换后的生物医学文本可读性
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Apr 16;3(4):e0000489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000489. eCollection 2024 Apr.
6
Reasons for Acceptance or Rejection of Online Record Access Among Patients Affected by a Severe Mental Illness: Mixed Methods Study.重度精神疾病患者接受或拒绝在线病历访问的原因:混合方法研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2024 Feb 5;11:e51126. doi: 10.2196/51126.
7
Perception of Physicians' Notes Among Parents of Different Health Literacy Levels.不同健康素养水平家长对医生笔记的感知。
Hosp Pediatr. 2024 Feb 1;14(2):108-115. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2023-007240.
8
Patient and family contributions to improve the diagnostic process through the OurDX electronic health record tool: a mixed method analysis.患者和家属通过 OurDX 电子健康记录工具为改善诊断过程做出的贡献:混合方法分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Aug 16;33(9):597-608. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015793.
9
Effect of using client-accessible youth health records on experienced autonomy among parents and adolescents in preventive child healthcare and youth care: A mixed methods intervention study.在儿童预防保健和青少年保健中使用客户可访问的青少年健康记录对父母和青少年自主体验的影响:一项混合方法干预研究。
J Child Health Care. 2025 Mar;29(1):79-96. doi: 10.1177/13674935231177782. Epub 2023 May 25.
10
A Patient-Centered Approach to Writing Ambulatory Visit Notes in the Cures Act Era.《治愈法案》时代以患者为中心的门诊就诊记录撰写方法。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Jan;14(1):199-204. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761436. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
患者对阅读就诊记录的重视之处:对患者健康信息体验的定性探究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 14;19(7):e237. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7212.
4
Patient Portals as a Tool for Health Care Engagement: A Mixed-Method Study of Older Adults With Varying Levels of Health Literacy and Prior Patient Portal Use.患者门户网站作为促进医疗参与的工具:对健康素养水平不同且之前使用过患者门户网站的老年人的一项混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Mar 30;19(3):e99. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7099.
5
mHealth and Health Information Technology Tools for Diverse Patients with Diabetes.适用于不同糖尿病患者的移动健康与健康信息技术工具
J Diabetes Res. 2017;2017:1704917. doi: 10.1155/2017/1704917. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
6
Intentional and Unintentional Medication Non-Adherence in Hypertension: The Role of Health Literacy, Empowerment and Medication Beliefs.高血压患者有意和无意的用药不依从性:健康素养、自我效能感和用药信念的作用
J Public Health Res. 2016 Dec 21;5(3):762. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2016.762. eCollection 2016 Dec 9.
7
Democratization of Health Care.医疗保健的民主化。
JAMA. 2016 Oct 25;316(16):1663-1664. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.14060.
8
Inviting patients and care partners to read doctors' notes: OpenNotes and shared access to electronic medical records.邀请患者及其护理伙伴阅读医生记录:开放式病历与电子病历的共享访问。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e166-e172. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw108.
9
Usability of Commercially Available Mobile Applications for Diverse Patients.面向不同患者的市售移动应用程序的可用性
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Dec;31(12):1417-1426. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3771-6. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
10
When doctors share visit notes with patients: a study of patient and doctor perceptions of documentation errors, safety opportunities and the patient-doctor relationship.当医生与患者共享就诊记录时:一项关于患者和医生对文档错误、安全机会以及医患关系的看法的研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Apr;26(4):262-270. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004697. Epub 2016 May 18.