Department of Radiology, National Hospital Organization Sendai Medical Center, Sendai, Miyagi, 983-8520, Japan.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.
Med Phys. 2021 Mar;48(3):1003-1018. doi: 10.1002/mp.14682. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
This study aimed to develop and evaluate a novel strategy for establishing a deep learning-based gamma passing rate (GPR) prediction model for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using dummy target plan data, one measurement process, and a multicriteria prediction method.
A total of 147 VMAT plans were used for the training set (two sets of 48 dummy target plans) and test set (51 clinical target plans). The dummy plans were measured using a diode array detector. We developed an original convolutional neural network that accepts coronal and sagittal dose distributions to predict the GPRs of 36 pairs of gamma criteria from 0.5%/0.5 mm to 3%/3 mm. Sixfold cross-validation and model averaging were performed, and the mean training result and mean test result were derived from six trained models that were produced during cross-validation.
Strong or moderate correlations were observed between the measured and predicted GPRs in all criteria. The mean absolute errors and root mean squared errors of the test set (clinical target plan) were 0.63 and 1.11 in 3%/3 mm, 1.16 and 1.73 in 3%/2 mm, 1.96 and 2.66 in 2%/2 mm, 5.00 and 6.35 in 1%/1 mm, and 5.42 and 6.78 in 0.5%/1 mm, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.80 in the training set and 0.68 in the test set at the 0.5%/1 mm criterion.
Our results suggest that the training of the deep learning-based quality assurance model can be performed using a dummy target plan.
本研究旨在开发和评估一种新的策略,通过使用虚拟目标计划数据、单一测量过程和多标准预测方法,为容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)建立基于深度学习的伽马通过率(GPR)预测模型。
共使用 147 个 VMAT 计划作为训练集(两套 48 个虚拟目标计划)和测试集(51 个临床靶区计划)。虚拟计划使用二极管阵列探测器进行测量。我们开发了一个原始的卷积神经网络,它接受冠状面和矢状面剂量分布,以预测 36 对伽马标准(从 0.5%/0.5mm 到 3%/3mm)的 GPR。进行了六重交叉验证和模型平均化,从六个在交叉验证中生成的训练模型中得出平均训练结果和平均测试结果。
在所有标准中,测量的 GPR 与预测的 GPR 之间存在强或中度相关性。测试集(临床靶区计划)的平均绝对误差和均方根误差分别为 3%/3mm 为 0.63 和 1.11、3%/2mm 为 1.16 和 1.73、2%/2mm 为 1.96 和 2.66、1%/1mm 为 5.00 和 6.35、0.5%/1mm 为 5.42 和 6.78。在训练集和测试集的 0.5%/1mm 标准下,Pearson 相关系数分别为 0.80 和 0.68。
我们的结果表明,基于深度学习的质量保证模型的训练可以使用虚拟目标计划进行。