• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挪威版临床学习环境比较调查的心理测量特性

Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the clinical learning environment comparison survey.

作者信息

Olaussen Camilla, Jelsness-Jørgensen Lars-Petter, Tvedt Christine Raaen, Hofoss Dag, Aase Ingunn, Steindal Simen A

机构信息

Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway.

The University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.

出版信息

Nurs Open. 2021 May;8(3):1254-1261. doi: 10.1002/nop2.742. Epub 2020 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1002/nop2.742
PMID:33369249
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8046064/
Abstract

AIM

To translate The Clinical Learning Environment Comparison Survey (CLECS) into Norwegian and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Norwegian version.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey including a longitudinal component.

METHODS

The CLECS was translated into Norwegian following the World Health Organization guidelines, including forward translation, expert panel, back-translation, pre-testing and cognitive interviewing. Nursing students at a Norwegian university college were invited to participate in the study (psychometrical testing) based on informed consent. Reliability and validity of the translated version of CLECS were investigated using a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach's alpha and test-retest analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 122 nursing students completed the questionnaire and Cronbach alphas for the CLECS subscales ranged from 0.69 to 0.89. CFA goodness-of-fit indices (χ /df = 1.409, CFI = 0.915, RMSEA = 0.058) showed acceptable model fit. Test-retest ICC ranged from 0.55 to 0.75, except for two subscales with values below 0.5.

摘要

目的

将临床学习环境比较调查(CLECS)翻译成挪威语,并评估挪威语版本的心理测量特性。

设计

一项包括纵向成分的横断面调查。

方法

按照世界卫生组织的指南将CLECS翻译成挪威语,包括正向翻译、专家小组、回译、预测试和认知访谈。基于知情同意,邀请挪威一所大学学院的护理专业学生参与该研究(心理测量测试)。使用验证性因素分析(CFA)、克朗巴哈系数和重测分析来研究CLECS翻译版本的信度和效度。

结果

共有122名护理专业学生完成了问卷,CLECS各分量表的克朗巴哈系数在0.69至0.89之间。CFA拟合优度指数(χ²/df = 1.409,CFI = 0.915,RMSEA = 0.058)显示模型拟合可接受。重测组内相关系数在0.55至0.75之间,除了两个分量表的值低于0.。 5。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f84/8046064/c9f80f321ec4/NOP2-8-1254-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f84/8046064/c9f80f321ec4/NOP2-8-1254-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f84/8046064/c9f80f321ec4/NOP2-8-1254-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the clinical learning environment comparison survey.挪威版临床学习环境比较调查的心理测量特性
Nurs Open. 2021 May;8(3):1254-1261. doi: 10.1002/nop2.742. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
2
Chinese version of the clinical learning environment comparison survey: Assessment of reliability and validity.临床学习环境比较调查中文版:信效度评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Dec;71:121-128. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.09.026. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
3
Cross-cultural validation and psychometric testing of the Norwegian version of the TeamSTEPPS® teamwork perceptions questionnaire.《团队STEPPS®团队合作认知问卷挪威语版的跨文化验证与心理测量测试》
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Dec 2;17(1):799. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2733-y.
4
The Norwegian version of the nursing student mentors' competence instrument (MCI): A psychometric validation study.挪威版护理专业学生导师能力测评工具(MCI):一项心理测量学效度验证研究。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Feb 3;6:100183. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100183. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Adaptation and psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the heart continuity of care questionnaire (HCCQ).挪威版心脏连续性护理问卷(HCCQ)的适应度和心理计量特性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Mar 18;19(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0706-z.
6
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
7
Psychometric properties and criterion related validity of the Norwegian version of hospital survey on patient safety culture 2.0.医院患者安全文化调查 2.0 挪威语版的心理测量学特性和效标关联效度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 18;24(1):642. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11097-7.
8
Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), Generic version (Short Form 2006).挪威版安全态度问卷(SAQ)通用版(2006年简版)的心理测量学特性
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Sep 22;8:191. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-191.
9
Translations and psychometric validation of the Korean version of the Nursing Teamwork Survey.《护理团队协作调查问卷》韩文版的翻译及心理测量学验证
Res Nurs Health. 2023 Apr;46(2):242-250. doi: 10.1002/nur.22297. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
10
Translation, cross-cultural adaption and measurement properties of the evidence-based practice profile.循证实践概况的翻译、跨文化调适及测量属性
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Jan 13;10(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2373-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM) in a Moroccan sample of nursing students.邓迪护理教育环境量表(DREEM)在摩洛哥护理专业学生样本中的心理测量学特性。
Belitung Nurs J. 2025 Apr 19;11(2):142-154. doi: 10.33546/bnj.3715. eCollection 2025.
2
Appraisal and Evaluation of the Learning Environment Instruments of the Student Nurse: A Systematic Review Using COSMIN Methodology.护生学习环境评估工具的评价与评估:使用COSMIN方法的系统评价
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 5;11(7):1043. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11071043.
3
Psychometric Properties of Clinical Learning Environment Comparison Survey Questionnaire in Nursing Students.

本文引用的文献

1
Chinese version of the clinical learning environment comparison survey: Assessment of reliability and validity.临床学习环境比较调查中文版:信效度评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Dec;71:121-128. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.09.026. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
2
Undergraduate nursing students' experience related to their clinical learning environment and factors affecting to their clinical learning process.本科护理专业学生与临床学习环境相关的经历以及影响其临床学习过程的因素。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2018 Mar;29:127-132. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2017.12.005. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
3
Effectiveness of Mental Health Simulation in Replacing Traditional Clinical Hours in Baccalaureate Nursing Education.
护理专业学生临床学习环境比较调查问卷的心理测量学特性
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2022 Oct;10(4):267-273. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2022.95206.1630.
4
Integrating simulation training during clinical practice in nursing homes: an experimental study of nursing students' knowledge acquisition, self-efficacy and learning needs.养老院临床实践中整合模拟培训:一项关于护生知识获取、自我效能感和学习需求的实验研究
BMC Nurs. 2022 Feb 22;21(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00824-2.
5
Psychometric properities of the Polish version of clinical learning environment inventory.波兰语版临床学习环境量表的心理测量学特性
BMC Nurs. 2021 Jul 8;20(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00649-5.
精神卫生模拟在本科护理教育中替代传统临床学时的有效性。
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2017 Nov 1;55(11):36-43. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20170905-03. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
4
Use of simulation-based learning in undergraduate nurse education: An umbrella systematic review.基于模拟的学习在本科护理教育中的应用:一项综合性系统评价。
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Feb;49:63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.015. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
5
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
6
Increasing faculty capacity: findings from an evaluation of simulation clinical teaching.提升教师能力:模拟临床教学评估的结果
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2014 Sep-Oct;35(5):308-14. doi: 10.5480/14-1384.
7
Are we preparing student nurses for final practice placement?我们是否在为实习护士的最终实习安排做好准备?
Br J Nurs. 2014;23(10):518-23. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2014.23.10.518.
8
Enhancing nursing knowledge using high-fidelity simulation.利用高保真模拟提升护理知识。
J Nurs Educ. 2012 Jan;51(1):9-15. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20111116-01. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
9
Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: language, setting, time and statistical considerations.研究工具的跨文化调适:语言、情境、时间和统计考量。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Feb 10;10:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-13.
10
Challenges and strategies of instrument translation.仪器翻译的挑战与策略
West J Nurs Res. 2006 Apr;28(3):310-21. doi: 10.1177/0193945905284712.