• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挪威版安全态度问卷(SAQ)通用版(2006年简版)的心理测量学特性

Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), Generic version (Short Form 2006).

作者信息

Deilkås Ellen T, Hofoss Dag

机构信息

Health Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Lorenskog, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Sep 22;8:191. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-191.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-8-191
PMID:18808693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2572612/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

How to protect patients from harm is a question of universal interest. Measuring and improving safety culture in care giving units is an important strategy for promoting a safe environment for patients. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) is the only instrument that measures safety culture in a way which correlates with patient outcome. We have translated the SAQ to Norwegian and validated the translated version. The psychometric properties of the translated questionnaire are presented in this article.

METHODS

The questionnaire was translated with the back translation technique and tested in 47 clinical units in a Norwegian university hospital. SAQ's (the Generic version (Short Form 2006) the version with the two sets of questions on perceptions of management: on unit management and on hospital management) were distributed to 1911 frontline staff. 762 were distributed during unit meetings and 1149 through the postal system. Cronbach alphas, item-to-own correlations, and test-retest correlations were calculated, and response distribution analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were performed, as well as early validity tests.

RESULTS

1306 staff members completed and returned the questionnaire: a response rate of 68%. Questionnaire acceptability was good. The reliability measures were acceptable. The factor structure of the responses was tested by confirmatory factor analysis. 36 items were ascribed to seven underlying factors: Teamwork Climate, Safety Climate, Stress Recognition, Perceptions of Hospital Management, Perceptions of Unit Management, Working conditions, and Job satisfaction. Goodness-of-Fit Indices showed reasonable, but not indisputable, model fit. External validity indicators - recognizability of results, correlations with "trigger tool"-identified adverse events, with patient satisfaction with hospitalization, patient reports of possible maltreatment, and patient evaluation of organization of hospital work - provided preliminary validation.

CONCLUSION

Based on the data from Akershus University Hospital, we conclude that the Norwegian translation of the SAQ showed satisfactory internal psychometric properties. With data from one hospital only, we cannot draw strong conclusions on its external validity. Further validation studies linking the SAQ-scores to patient outcome data should be performed.

摘要

背景

如何保护患者免受伤害是一个广受关注的问题。衡量并改善护理单元的安全文化是为患者营造安全环境的一项重要策略。安全态度问卷(SAQ)是唯一一种以与患者预后相关的方式来衡量安全文化的工具。我们已将SAQ翻译成挪威语并对翻译版本进行了验证。本文介绍了翻译后问卷的心理测量特性。

方法

采用回译技术对问卷进行翻译,并在挪威一家大学医院的47个临床单元进行测试。向1911名一线工作人员发放了SAQ(通用版(2006年简版)以及包含两组关于管理认知问题的版本:关于单元管理和医院管理)。762份通过单元会议发放,1149份通过邮政系统发放。计算了克朗巴哈系数、项目与自身的相关性以及重测相关性,并进行了反应分布分析、验证性因素分析以及早期效度测试。

结果

1306名工作人员完成并返还了问卷,回复率为68%。问卷的可接受性良好。可靠性测量结果可以接受。通过验证性因素分析对回复的因素结构进行了测试。36个项目被归为七个潜在因素:团队合作氛围、安全氛围、压力认知、对医院管理的认知、对单元管理的认知、工作条件和工作满意度。拟合优度指标显示模型拟合合理但并非无可争议。外部效度指标——结果的可识别性、与“触发工具法”确定的不良事件的相关性、与患者住院满意度的相关性、患者对可能虐待行为的报告以及患者对医院工作组织的评价——提供了初步验证。

结论

基于阿克什胡斯大学医院的数据,我们得出结论,SAQ的挪威语翻译版本显示出令人满意的内部心理测量特性。由于仅来自一家医院的数据,我们无法就其外部效度得出有力结论。应开展进一步的验证研究,将SAQ分数与患者预后数据联系起来。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5015/2572612/885fd13cf233/1472-6963-8-191-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5015/2572612/e95f9440c860/1472-6963-8-191-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5015/2572612/127ca4bf0f9a/1472-6963-8-191-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5015/2572612/3934ba509fdd/1472-6963-8-191-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5015/2572612/885fd13cf233/1472-6963-8-191-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5015/2572612/e95f9440c860/1472-6963-8-191-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5015/2572612/127ca4bf0f9a/1472-6963-8-191-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5015/2572612/3934ba509fdd/1472-6963-8-191-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5015/2572612/885fd13cf233/1472-6963-8-191-4.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), Generic version (Short Form 2006).挪威版安全态度问卷(SAQ)通用版(2006年简版)的心理测量学特性
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Sep 22;8:191. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-191.
2
Validation of the Dutch language version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ-NL).荷兰语版安全态度问卷(SAQ-NL)的验证
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 15;16(a):385. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1648-3.
3
The safety attitudes questionnaire - ambulatory version: psychometric properties of the Norwegian version for nursing homes.安全态度问卷 - 门诊版:挪威养老院版本的心理测量特性
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 25;19(1):423. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4244-5.
4
The safety attitudes questionnaire - ambulatory version: psychometric properties of the Norwegian translated version for the primary care setting.安全态度问卷 - 门诊版:初级保健环境中挪威语翻译版的心理测量特性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Mar 29;14:139. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-139.
5
Perceptions of safety culture vary across the intensive care units of a single institution.在同一机构的重症监护病房中,对安全文化的认知存在差异。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):165-76. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000251505.76026.CF.
6
Assessing the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), German language version in Swiss university hospitals--a validation study.评估安全态度问卷(SAQ),德语版,瑞士大学医院-验证研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Sep 10;13:347. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-347.
7
Content validity and internal consistency of the Dutch translation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: an observational study.荷兰版《安全态度问卷》的内容效度和内部一致性:一项观察性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Mar;49(3):327-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.10.002. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
8
Variation in safety culture dimensions within and between US and Swiss Hospital Units: an exploratory study.美国和瑞士医院单位内部和之间的安全文化维度的变化:一项探索性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Jan;22(1):32-41. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000446. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
9
Safety culture in the primary health care settings based on workers with a leadership role: the psychometric properties of the Slovenian-language version of the safety attitudes questionnaire - short form.基于具有领导作用的工作人员的初级卫生保健机构中的安全文化:斯洛文尼亚语版安全态度问卷简表的心理测量特性
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 11;18(1):767. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3594-8.
10
Use of a safety climate questionnaire in UK health care: factor structure, reliability and usability.英国医疗保健领域安全氛围调查问卷的使用:因素结构、信度与可用性
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Oct;15(5):347-53. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.016584.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of the Green Cross method on patient safety culture in a postanaesthesia care unit: a longitudinal quasi-experimental study.绿色十字方法对麻醉后护理单元患者安全文化的影响:一项纵向准实验研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Oct 2;13(4):e002964. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002964.
2
Developing patient safety scale for hospitals.研制医院患者安全量表。
Turk J Med Sci. 2024 Jan 5;54(2):449-458. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5810. eCollection 2024.
3
Psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of Emergency Medical Services- Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (EMS-SAQ).

本文引用的文献

1
Parent experiences of paediatric care (PEPC) questionnaire: reliability and validity following a national survey.儿童护理家长体验(PEPC)问卷:全国性调查后的信度与效度
Acta Paediatr. 2007 Feb;96(2):246-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00049.x.
2
Creating high reliability in health care organizations.在医疗保健机构中建立高可靠性。
Health Serv Res. 2006 Aug;41(4 Pt 2):1599-617. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00567.x.
3
Measuring safety climate in health care.衡量医疗保健中的安全氛围。
《紧急医疗服务-安全态度问卷(EMS-SAQ)波斯语版的心理计量学评估》。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Feb 14;24(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00941-y.
4
Review: application of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) in primary care - a systematic synthesis on validity, descriptive and comparative results, and variance across organisational units.综述:安全态度问卷(SAQ)在初级保健中的应用——关于效度、描述性和比较性结果以及组织单位间差异的系统综合分析
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jan 25;25(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02273-z.
5
Determining the psychometric properties of safety attitudes questionnaire in NICUs.测定 NICUs 中安全态度调查问卷的心理计量特性。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Jul 20;11(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01229-9.
6
Measuring the patient safety culture at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan using the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC).采用医院患者安全文化调查(HSOPSC)量表评估巴基斯坦一家三级保健医院的患者安全文化。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Mar;12(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002029.
7
Validation of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire for Assessing Patient Safety Culture in Critical Care Settings of Three Selected Ugandan Hospitals.用于评估乌干达三家选定医院重症监护环境中患者安全文化的安全态度问卷的验证
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2023 Jan 26;15:13-23. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S389978. eCollection 2023.
8
Assessment of patient safety culture among the staff of the University Hospital for Gynecology and Obstetrics in Alexandria, Egypt.埃及亚历山大大学妇产科医院工作人员的患者安全文化评估。
J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2022 Oct 12;97(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s42506-022-00110-8.
9
The influence of physician-nurse collaboration on patient safety culture.医护协作对患者安全文化的影响。
Heliyon. 2022 Sep 16;8(9):e10649. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10649. eCollection 2022 Sep.
10
Measuring Patient Safety Climate in Acute Stroke Therapy.评估急性中风治疗中的患者安全氛围。
Front Neurol. 2021 Oct 1;12:686649. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.686649. eCollection 2021.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2006 Apr;15(2):109-15. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014761.
4
The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research.安全态度问卷:心理测量特性、基准数据及新兴研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Apr 3;6:44. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-44.
5
Measuring patient safety climate: a review of surveys.衡量患者安全氛围:调查综述
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Oct;14(5):364-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014217.
6
Using a multihospital survey to examine the safety culture.利用多医院调查来审视安全文化。
Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2004 Mar;30(3):125-32. doi: 10.1016/s1549-3741(04)30014-6.
7
Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research.跨文化研究中研究工具的翻译与验证
Gastroenterology. 2004 Jan;126(1 Suppl 1):S124-8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.016.
8
Discrepant attitudes about teamwork among critical care nurses and physicians.重症监护护士和医生对团队合作的态度存在差异。
Crit Care Med. 2003 Mar;31(3):956-9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000056183.89175.76.
9
Institutional resilience in healthcare systems.医疗系统中的机构恢复力。
Qual Health Care. 2001 Mar;10(1):29-32. doi: 10.1136/qhc.10.1.29.
10
Error, stress, and teamwork in medicine and aviation: cross sectional surveys.医学与航空领域中的失误、压力及团队协作:横断面调查
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):745-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.745.