Department of Psychology, Syracuse University.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2020 Dec;88(12):1119-1132. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000615.
Studying clinical course after alcohol use disorder (AUD) treatment is central to understanding longer-term recovery. This study's two main objectives were to (a) replicate a recent study that identified heterogeneity in patterns of remission from/relapse to heavy drinking during the first year after outpatient treatment in an independent data set and (b) extend these recent findings by testing associations between patterns of remission/relapse and long-term alcohol-related and functioning outcomes.
Latent profile analyses were conducted using data from Project MATCH (N = 952; M age = 38.9; 72.3% female) and COMBINE (N = 1,383; M age = 44.4; 69.1% male). Transitions between heavy and nonheavy drinking within consecutive 2-week periods over a 1-year posttreatment period were characterized for each participant. From this, latent profiles were identified based on participants' initial 2-week heavy drinking status, the number of observed transitions between 2-week periods of relapse and remission, and the average duration of observed remission/relapse episodes.
In both MATCH and COMBINE, we identified six profiles: (a) "continuous remission," 25.3% of COMBINE sample/25.3% of MATCH sample; (b) "transition to remission," 19.6%/9.6%; (c) "few long transitions," 15.9%/33.7%; (d) "many short transitions," 13.2%/13.6%; (e) "transition to relapse," 7.2%/7.1%; and (f) "continuous relapse," 18.8%/10.5%. Profiles 1 and 2 had the best long-term outcomes, Profiles 5 and 6 had the worst, and Profiles 3 and 4 fell between these groups.
That many individuals can remit from heavy drinking following one or more relapses to heavy drinking may be of direct interest to individuals in recovery from AUD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
研究酒精使用障碍(AUD)治疗后的临床病程对于了解长期康复至关重要。本研究的两个主要目的是:(a)在独立的数据集中复制最近的一项研究,该研究确定了门诊治疗后第一年从/复发至重度饮酒的缓解模式的异质性;(b)通过测试缓解/复发模式与长期酒精相关和功能结果之间的关联,扩展这些最近的发现。
使用项目 MATCH(N=952;M 年龄=38.9;72.3%女性)和 COMBINE(N=1383;M 年龄=44.4;69.1%男性)的数据进行潜在剖面分析。在治疗后 1 年内的连续 2 周期间,对每个参与者的重度和非重度饮酒之间的转变进行了描述。在此基础上,根据参与者最初 2 周的重度饮酒状态、观察到的复发和缓解之间的转变次数以及观察到的缓解/复发发作的平均持续时间,确定潜在的轮廓。
在 MATCH 和 COMBINE 中,我们都确定了六个轮廓:(a)“持续缓解”,占 COMBINE 样本的 25.3%/MATCH 样本的 25.3%;(b)“缓解过渡”,占 19.6%/9.6%;(c)“很少长过渡”,占 15.9%/33.7%;(d)“很多短过渡”,占 13.2%/13.6%;(e)“缓解过渡”,占 7.2%/7.1%;(f)“持续复发”,占 18.8%/10.5%。第 1 组和第 2 组具有最佳的长期结果,第 5 组和第 6 组最差,第 3 组和第 4 组介于这两组之间。
许多人在经历一次或多次复发至重度饮酒后可以从重度饮酒中缓解,这可能对 AUD 康复中的个体直接感兴趣。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。