Research Center for Economy of Upper Reaches of the Yangtse River/School of Accounting, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing, China.
Sichuan Province Circular Economy Research Center, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Sichuan, China.
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0244083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244083. eCollection 2020.
The answer to this article lies in: Does the financial activities of physical enterprises have an adverse impact on their main business? Is it conducive to the sustainable development of the national economy? However, when most scholars study the impact of environmental regulations on companies performance, they have not classified companies performance. This article will study the relationship between environmental regulations and performance levels based on the classification of companies performance, and then divide the nature of industry pollution, companies location and nature of property for in-depth research.
First, this article uses a random effect variable-intercept model to measure companies financial performance and non-financial performance. Then, the variables are divided into two variable groups: light pollution and heavy pollution according to the nature of industry pollution. Next, the companies are divided into three variable groups: the eastern region, the central region, and the western region. Finally, the company is divided into two variable groups: state-owned and non-state-owned according to the nature of property.
The study found that: (1) Environmental regulations have inhibited companies financial activities. And the inhibitory effect of environmental regulations on the financial performance of enterprises is more obvious in the heavily polluting industries and enterprises in central and eastern regions. (2) Environmental regulations and companies non-financial performance are also negatively related, environmental regulations have also inhibited the non-financial performance of companies, this effect is more pronounced in heavily polluting industries and enterprises in western regions. (3) Income crowding effect brought by China's environmental regulations is greater than the income compensation effect brought by stimulating technological innovation.
本文的答案在于:实体企业的财务活动是否对其主营业务产生不利影响?是否有利于国民经济的可持续发展?然而,当大多数学者研究环境法规对公司绩效的影响时,他们并没有对公司绩效进行分类。本文将在基于公司绩效分类的基础上,研究环境法规与绩效水平之间的关系,然后根据行业污染性质、公司所在地和性质对产权进行深入研究。
首先,本文采用随机效应变截距模型来衡量公司的财务绩效和非财务绩效。然后,根据行业污染性质将变量分为轻污染和重污染两组。接下来,将公司分为东部、中部和西部三个变量组。最后,根据产权性质将公司分为国有和非国有企业两组。
研究发现:(1)环境法规抑制了公司的财务活动。环境法规对企业财务绩效的抑制作用在重污染行业和中东部地区的企业中更为明显。(2)环境法规与公司非财务绩效也呈负相关,环境法规也抑制了公司的非财务绩效,这种效应在西部地区重污染行业和企业中更为明显。(3)中国环境法规带来的收入拥挤效应大于刺激技术创新带来的收入补偿效应。