Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, VU Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Human Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Mesa, Arizona, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 28;15(12):e0244188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244188. eCollection 2020.
A salient objective feature of the social environment in which people find themselves is group size. Knowledge of group size is highly relevant to behavioural scientists given that humans spend considerable time in social settings and the number of others influences much of human behaviour. What size of group do people actually look for and encounter in everyday life? Here we report four survey studies and one experience-sampling study (total N = 4,398) which provide evidence for the predominance of the dyad in daily life. Relative to larger group sizes, dyads are most common across a wide range of activities (e.g., conversations, projects, holidays, movies, sports, bars) obtained from three time moments (past activities, present, and future activities), sampling both mixed-sex and same-sex groups, with three different methodological approaches (retrospective reports, real-time data capture, and preference measures) in the United States and the Netherlands. We offer four mechanisms that may help explain this finding: reciprocity, coordination, social exclusion, and reproduction. The present findings advance our understanding of how individuals organize themselves in everyday life.
人们所处的社会环境的一个显著客观特征是群体规模。鉴于人类在社交环境中花费了大量时间,并且他人的数量会影响到人类的许多行为,因此了解群体规模对行为科学家来说非常重要。在日常生活中,人们实际上会寻找并遇到多大规模的群体?在这里,我们报告了四项调查研究和一项体验抽样研究(总 N=4398),这些研究为日常生活中对偶体的主导地位提供了证据。与更大的群体规模相比,对偶体在各种活动中最为常见(例如,对话、项目、假期、电影、运动、酒吧),这些活动来自三个时间点(过去的活动、现在的活动和未来的活动),在美国和荷兰采用了三种不同的方法(回顾性报告、实时数据采集和偏好测量)来采样混合性别和同性别的群体。我们提出了四个可能有助于解释这一发现的机制:互惠、协调、社会排斥和复制。本研究结果有助于我们理解个体如何在日常生活中组织自己。