Department of Endocrine Rheumatism and nephrology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University.
Department of Pathology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 18;99(51):e23672. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023672.
Observational studies have reported that Vitamin D deficiency and the risk type 2 diabetes are associated, but the causation is unclear. Mendelian randomization (MR) involving genetic variants as instrument variables (IVs) overcomes the reverse-casualty and unmeasured confounding. However, with limited sample size and IVs, previous MR studies showed inconsistent results. Leveraging by a largely increased sample size for both stages, we aim to provide an updated and precise estimate for the causality between Vitamin D and type 2 diabetes.A 2-sample multi-IVs MR was performed. IVs for circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) were obtained from a genome-wide association study from UK biobank involving 329,247 subjects of European ancestry. The causal effect of 25(OH)D and type 2 diabetes was estimated using traditional inverse variance weighting and MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) framework which provides a robust estimate by systematically filtering out IVs identified with potential pleiotropy effects.A higher genetically instrumented 25(OH)D was causally linked to reduced risk of type 2 diabetes risk by MR-PRESSO [odds ratio (OR) per standard deviation (SD) = 0.950, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.913-0.988, P = .010] after removing 13 (13/193) invalid IVs. In addition, we confirmed the causal role Vitamin D using 2 synthesis-related single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) which are consistent with previous MR studies [OR per SD = 0.894, 95% CI = 0.816-0.979, P = .016].With a largely improved sample size, our results confirmed that genetically increased 25(OH)D concentration reduced the risk of type 2 diabetes and provided a more precise estimate for the effect size. The updated result empowers the role of Vitamin D and provides nontrivial evidence for interventional studies.
观察性研究报告称,维生素 D 缺乏与 2 型糖尿病风险有关,但因果关系尚不清楚。涉及遗传变异作为工具变量 (IVs) 的孟德尔随机化 (MR) 克服了反向因果关系和未测量的混杂。然而,由于样本量有限和 IVs 数量有限,先前的 MR 研究结果不一致。利用两个阶段的样本量大大增加,我们旨在为维生素 D 与 2 型糖尿病之间的因果关系提供一个更新和更精确的估计。进行了两样本多-IVs MR。来自 UK biobank 的全基因组关联研究中的循环 25-羟维生素 D (25(OH)D) 的 IVs 用于 329247 名欧洲血统的研究对象。使用传统的逆方差加权和 MR 多效性残差总和和异常值 (MR-PRESSO) 框架估计 25(OH)D 和 2 型糖尿病的因果效应,该框架通过系统地筛选出具有潜在多效性效应的 IVs,提供了一个稳健的估计。通过 MR-PRESSO,更高的遗传工具化 25(OH)D 与 2 型糖尿病风险降低相关[每标准差 (SD) 的优势比 (OR) = 0.950,95%置信区间 (CI) = 0.913-0.988,P =.010],在去除 13 个 (13/193) 无效 IVs 后。此外,我们使用 2 个与合成相关的单核苷酸多态性 (SNP) 证实了维生素 D 的因果作用,这与先前的 MR 研究一致[每 SD 的 OR = 0.894,95% CI = 0.816-0.979,P =.016]。通过大大提高的样本量,我们的结果证实,遗传上增加的 25(OH)D 浓度降低了 2 型糖尿病的风险,并为效应大小提供了更精确的估计。更新的结果证实了维生素 D 的作用,并为干预性研究提供了重要证据。