Institute for Complex Dynamical Systems and MicroData Analytics, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.
BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 28;10(1):22392. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79731-y.
The public goods game is a famous example illustrating the tragedy of the commons (Hardin in Science 162:1243-1248, 1968). In this game cooperating individuals contribute to a pool, which in turn is distributed to all members of the group, including defectors who reap the same rewards as cooperators without having made a contribution before. The question is now, how to incentivize group members to all cooperate as it maximizes the common good. While costly punishment (Helbing et al. in New J Phys 12:083005, 2010) presents one such method, the cost of punishment still reduces the common good. The selfishness of the group members favors defectors. Here we show that including other members of the groups and sharing rewards with them can be another incentive for cooperation, avoiding the cost required for punishment. Further, we show how punishment and this form of inclusiveness interact. This work suggests that a redistribution similar to a basic income that is coupled to the economic success of the entire group could overcome the tragedy of the commons.
公共物品博弈是一个著名的例子,说明了公地悲剧(Hardin 在 Science 162:1243-1248, 1968 年)。在这个游戏中,合作的个体为一个池贡献,而这个池反过来又分配给群体的所有成员,包括那些以前没有做出贡献但却获得与合作者相同回报的叛徒。现在的问题是,如何激励群体成员进行合作,因为这最大限度地增加了共同利益。虽然昂贵的惩罚(Helbing 等人在 New J Phys 12:083005, 2010 年)提供了一种这样的方法,但惩罚的成本仍然降低了共同利益。群体成员的自私自利有利于叛徒。在这里,我们表明,包括群体的其他成员并与他们分享奖励可以是合作的另一种激励,避免了惩罚所需的成本。此外,我们展示了惩罚和这种包容性形式如何相互作用。这项工作表明,类似于与整个群体的经济成功挂钩的基本收入的再分配可以克服公地悲剧。