• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用绿十字方法提高患者安全意识:对用户体验的定性描述

Enabling patient safety awareness using the Green Cross method: A qualitative description of users' experience.

作者信息

Schwarz Anneli, Isaksson Stina, Källman Ulrika, Rusner Marie

机构信息

Department of Research, Education and Innovation, Region Västra Götaland, South Älvsborg Hospital, Borås, Sweden.

Department of Development, Region Västra Götaland, South Älvsborg Hospital, Borås, Sweden.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2021 Mar;30(5-6):830-839. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15626. Epub 2021 Jan 17.

DOI:10.1111/jocn.15626
PMID:33372328
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8048610/
Abstract

AIM

The Green Cross method was developed to support healthcare staff in daily patient safety work. The aim of this study was to describe users' experiences of the method when working with patient safety and their views on the core elements.

BACKGROUND

Patient safety systems need to be user-friendly to facilitate learning from adverse events. The Green Cross method is described as a simple visual method to recognise risks and preventable adverse events (PAEs) in real time. There are no previous studies describing users' experiences of the Green Cross method.

DESIGN

A qualitative descriptive design.

METHODS

32 healthcare workers and managers from different specialties in a Swedish hospital were interviewed, from May-September 2018 about their experiences of the Green Cross method; either individually or as part of a group. The interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. The study follows the COREQ guidelines for qualitative data.

RESULTS

Participants associated the Green Cross method with patient safety, but no core elements of the method were identified. Instead, the opportunity to be engaged in patient safety work in a systematic way was underlined by all study participants. Highlighted key areas were the simplicity and the systematic framework of the method along with a need of distinct leadership. The daily meetings promoted trust and dialogue and developed the patient safety mindset. Daily meetings, together with the visualisation of the cross, were emphasised as important by users who otherwise had limited knowledge of the entire method.

CONCLUSION

This study offers valuable information that can help deepen the understanding of how the method specifically supports patient safety work.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Healthcare workers are expected to report patient safety issues. This study presents user-friendly aspects of the method as well as limitations, relevant for present and future users.

摘要

目的

绿色十字方法旨在支持医护人员开展日常患者安全工作。本研究的目的是描述使用者在开展患者安全工作时对该方法的体验以及他们对核心要素的看法。

背景

患者安全系统需要便于使用,以促进从不良事件中吸取经验教训。绿色十字方法被描述为一种简单的可视化方法,可实时识别风险和可预防的不良事件(PAE)。此前尚无研究描述使用者对绿色十字方法的体验。

设计

定性描述性设计。

方法

2018年5月至9月,对瑞典一家医院不同专科的32名医护人员和管理人员进行了访谈,了解他们对绿色十字方法的体验;访谈方式为单独或小组访谈。采用主题分析法对访谈进行分析。本研究遵循定性数据的COREQ指南。

结果

参与者将绿色十字方法与患者安全联系起来,但未确定该方法的核心要素。相反,所有研究参与者都强调了以系统方式参与患者安全工作的机会。突出的关键领域包括该方法的简单性和系统性框架以及对明确领导的需求。日常会议促进了信任和对话,并培养了患者安全思维。对于那些对整个方法了解有限的使用者来说,日常会议以及十字标识的可视化被强调为重要内容。

结论

本研究提供了有价值的信息,有助于加深对该方法如何具体支持患者安全工作的理解。

与临床实践的相关性

医护人员应报告患者安全问题。本研究介绍了该方法对使用者友好的方面以及局限性,对当前和未来的使用者都具有参考价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db4/8048610/c2840d039206/JOCN-30-830-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db4/8048610/c2840d039206/JOCN-30-830-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5db4/8048610/c2840d039206/JOCN-30-830-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Enabling patient safety awareness using the Green Cross method: A qualitative description of users' experience.运用绿十字方法提高患者安全意识:对用户体验的定性描述
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Mar;30(5-6):830-839. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15626. Epub 2021 Jan 17.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond formalized plans: User involvement in support in daily living - users' and support workers' experiences.超越正式计划:用户在日常生活支持中的参与——用户和支持工作者的经验。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;66(2):156-162. doi: 10.1177/0020764019894603. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
4
Provision and uptake of routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis.常规产前服务的提供与接受情况:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 12;6(6):CD012392. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012392.pub2.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Learning from patient safety incidents: The Green Cross method.从患者安全事件中学习:绿色十字方法。
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 Mar;30(2):e13114. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13114. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
7
Green Cross method in a postanaesthesia care unit: a qualitative study of the healthcare professionals' experiences after 3 years, including the COVID-19 pandemic period.格林克罗斯术后复苏单元法:COVID-19 大流行期间,3 年后医护人员经验的定性研究
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 May;12(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002247.
8
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
9
Healthcare workers' experiences of patient safety in the intensive care unit during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multicentre qualitative study.医护人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间对重症监护病房患者安全的体验:一项多中心定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Oct;32(19-20):7372-7381. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16793. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
10
Healthcare users' experiences of communicating with healthcare professionals about children who have life-limiting conditions: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医疗保健使用者就患有危及生命疾病的儿童与医疗保健专业人员沟通的经历:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):33-42. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2413.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of the Green Cross method on patient safety culture in a postanaesthesia care unit: a longitudinal quasi-experimental study.绿色十字方法对麻醉后护理单元患者安全文化的影响:一项纵向准实验研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Oct 2;13(4):e002964. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002964.
2
Learning from patient safety incidents: The Green Cross method.从患者安全事件中学习:绿色十字方法。
Nurs Crit Care. 2025 Mar;30(2):e13114. doi: 10.1111/nicc.13114. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
3
Green Cross method in a postanaesthesia care unit: a qualitative study of the healthcare professionals' experiences after 3 years, including the COVID-19 pandemic period.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the Green Cross Method Regarding Patient Safety Culture and Incidence Reporting.《关于患者安全文化和事件报告的绿十字方法评估》。
J Patient Saf. 2022 Jan 1;18(1):e18-e25. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000685.
2
Do safety briefings improve patient safety in the acute hospital setting? A systematic review.安全简报是否能提高急性医院环境中的患者安全性?系统评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Oct;75(10):2085-2098. doi: 10.1111/jan.13984. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
3
The professional culture among physicians in Sweden: potential implications for patient safety.
格林克罗斯术后复苏单元法:COVID-19 大流行期间,3 年后医护人员经验的定性研究
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 May;12(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002247.
4
Experience of learning from everyday work in daily safety huddles-a multi-method study.从日常安全班前会上的工作学习经验——一项多方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 30;22(1):1101. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08462-9.
瑞典医生的专业文化:对患者安全的潜在影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 11;18(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3328-y.
4
Patient Safety Learning Systems: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Synthesis.患者安全学习系统:系统评价与定性综合分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2017 Mar 1;17(3):1-23. eCollection 2017.
5
A National Study of Patient Safety Culture in Hospitals in Sweden.瑞典全国医院患者安全文化研究。
J Patient Saf. 2019 Dec;15(4):328-333. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000369.
6
How Effective Are Incident-Reporting Systems for Improving Patient Safety? A Systematic Literature Review.事件报告系统对改善患者安全的效果如何?一项系统文献综述。
Milbank Q. 2015 Dec;93(4):826-66. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12166.
7
Factors that influence the recognition, reporting and resolution of incidents related to medical devices and other healthcare technologies: a systematic review.影响与医疗设备及其他医疗技术相关事件的识别、报告和解决的因素:一项系统综述
Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 29;4:37. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0028-0.
8
What to do with healthcare incident reporting systems.如何处理医疗事件报告系统。
J Public Health Res. 2013 Dec 1;2(3):e27. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2013.e27.
9
Evaluating the effect of safety culture on error reporting: a comparison of managerial and staff perspectives.评估安全文化对错误报告的影响:管理者与员工视角的比较
Am J Med Qual. 2015 Nov-Dec;30(6):550-8. doi: 10.1177/1062860614544469. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
10
The Relationship Between Patient Safety Culture and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review.患者安全文化与患者结局之间的关系:一项系统综述。
J Patient Saf. 2015 Sep;11(3):135-42. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000058.