Suppr超能文献

[参与式研究中使用的分类方法]

[Categorizing methods used in participatory research].

作者信息

Kasberg Azize, Müller Patrick, Markert Claudia, Bär Gesine

机构信息

Alice Salomon Hochschule Berlin, Alice-Salomon-Platz 5, 12627, Berlin, Deutschland.

出版信息

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2021 Feb;64(2):146-155. doi: 10.1007/s00103-020-03267-9. Epub 2020 Dec 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Participatory research methods are gaining interest. In applying these methods, there is often a lack of consideration for methodological issues. Furthermore, a unifying system for categorizing the various approaches does not exist.

OBJECTIVES

Based on a scoping review, a categorization of participatory research methods to promote health equity was undertaken.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Included in the review are 44 publications in German and English retrieved from various databases (PubMed, PsycInfo, SocIndex, Livivo, Cochrane, Fachportal Pädagogik). Additional publications were identified by hand searching and using the snowball method.

RESULTS

The methods are categorized by research phase and type of format used. The principles of multidimensionality and phase integration are central to the proposed system of categorization, resulting in a primary distinction between the methods used to facilitate the participatory research process versus methods used for participatory data collection and analysis. The majority of methods identified are used for data collection or reflexive processes. There are gaps in the German literature regarding methods for cooperative decision making, participatory data analysis, and the application of research results.

CONCLUSION

The classification system provides an overview of available methods and the degree of participation they promote. The system draws attention to the spectrum of methods available, being useful for both teaching and research purposes.

摘要

背景

参与式研究方法正日益受到关注。在应用这些方法时,人们往往缺乏对方法学问题的考虑。此外,不存在一个统一的系统来对各种方法进行分类。

目的

基于一项范围综述,对促进健康公平的参与式研究方法进行了分类。

材料与方法

纳入综述的有从多个数据库(PubMed、PsycInfo、SocIndex、Livivo、Cochrane、Fachportal Pädagogik)检索到的44篇德语和英语出版物。通过手工检索和使用滚雪球法确定了其他出版物。

结果

这些方法按研究阶段和所使用的形式类型进行分类。多维性和阶段整合原则是所提议分类系统的核心,导致用于促进参与式研究过程的方法与用于参与式数据收集和分析的方法之间存在主要区别。所确定的大多数方法用于数据收集或反思过程。德语文献在合作决策方法、参与式数据分析和研究结果应用方面存在空白。

结论

该分类系统概述了可用方法及其促进的参与程度。该系统提请人们注意可用方法的范围,对教学和研究目的都很有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9061/7843478/e6ef232a1e4d/103_2020_3267_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验