Corsalini Massimo, D'Agostino Silvia, Favia Gianfranco, Dolci Marco, Tempesta Angela, Di Venere Daniela, Limongelli Luisa, Capodiferro Saverio
Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70023 Bari, Italy.
Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Dec 24;9(1):11. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9010011.
The most recently reported techniques for the rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior maxilla are increasingly less invasive, as they are generally oriented to avoid sinus floor elevation with lateral access. The authors describe a mini-invasive surgical technique for short spiral implant insertion for the prosthetic rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior maxilla, which could be considered a combination of several previously described techniques based on the under-preparation of the implant site to improve fixture primary stability and crestal approach to the sinus floor elevation without heterologous bone graft. Eighty short spiral implants were inserted in the molar area of the maxilla in patients with 4.5-6 mm of alveolar bone, measured on pre-operative computed tomography. The surgical technique involved careful drilling for the preparation of implant sites at differentiated depths, allowing bone dislocation in the apical direction, traumatic crestal sinus membrane elevation, and insertion of an implant (with spiral morphology) longer than pre-operative measurements. Prostheses were all single crowns. In all cases, a spiral implant 2-4 mm longer than the residual bone was placed. Only two implants were lost due to peri-implantitis but subsequently replaced and followed-up. Bone loss values around the implants after three months (at the re-opening) ranged from 0 to 0.6 mm, (median value: 0.1 mm), while after two years, the same values ranged from 0.4 to 1.3 mm (median value: 0.7 mm). Clinical post-operative complications did not occur. After ten years, no implant has been lost. Overall, the described protocol seems to show good results in terms of predictability and patient compliance.
最近报道的用于萎缩性上颌后牙区修复的技术侵入性越来越小,因为它们通常旨在避免通过侧方入路进行上颌窦底提升。作者描述了一种用于萎缩性上颌后牙区假体修复的短螺旋种植体植入的微创外科技术,该技术可被视为几种先前描述技术的组合,即基于种植体部位准备不足来提高种植体初期稳定性,并采用嵴顶入路进行上颌窦底提升而无需异体骨移植。在术前计算机断层扫描上测量牙槽骨为4.5 - 6毫米的患者的上颌磨牙区植入了80枚短螺旋种植体。手术技术包括在不同深度仔细钻孔以准备种植体部位,使骨向根尖方向移位,进行创伤性嵴顶窦膜提升,并植入比术前测量值更长的(具有螺旋形态的)种植体。修复体均为单冠。在所有病例中,均植入了比剩余骨长2 - 4毫米的螺旋种植体。仅2枚种植体因种植体周围炎而丢失,但随后进行了更换并随访。三个月后(再次切开时)种植体周围的骨吸收值范围为0至0.6毫米(中位数:0.1毫米),而两年后,相同的值范围为0.4至1.3毫米(中位数:0.7毫米)。术后未发生临床并发症。十年后,没有种植体丢失。总体而言,所描述的方案在可预测性和患者依从性方面似乎显示出良好的效果。