Arita Reiko, Fukuoka Shima, Kawashima Motoko
Department of Ophthalmology, Itoh Clinic, 626-11 Minami-Nakano, Minumaku, Saitama 337-0042, Japan.
Lid and Meibomian Gland Working Group (LIME), Tokyo 112-0006, Japan.
J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 27;10(1):65. doi: 10.3390/jcm10010065.
Although the pathophysiology of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) remains incompletely understood, many treatment options have recently become available. According to an international workshop report, treatment selection for MGD should be based on a comprehensive stage classification dependent on ocular symptoms, lid margin abnormalities, meibum grade, and ocular surface staining. However, it is often difficult to evaluate all parameters required for such classification in routine clinical practice. We have now retrospectively evaluated therapeutic efficacy in MGD patients who received five types of treatment in the clinic setting: (1) meibocare (application of a warm compress and practice of lid hygiene), (2) meibum expression plus meibocare, (3) azithromycin eyedrops plus meibocare, (4) thermal pulsation therapy plus meibocare, or (5) intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy plus meibocare. Patients in each treatment group were classified into three subsets according to the meiboscore determined by noncontact meibography at baseline. Eyes in the IPL group showed improvement even if the meiboscore was high (5 or 6), whereas meibocare tended to be effective only if the meiboscore was low (1 or 2). The meiboscore may thus serve to guide selection of the most appropriate treatment in MGD patients. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these outcomes.
尽管睑板腺功能障碍(MGD)的病理生理学仍未完全明确,但最近已有多种治疗选择。根据一份国际研讨会报告,MGD的治疗选择应基于综合分期分类,该分类取决于眼部症状、睑缘异常、睑脂等级和眼表染色。然而,在常规临床实践中,往往难以评估此类分类所需的所有参数。我们现在回顾性评估了在临床环境中接受五种治疗的MGD患者的治疗效果:(1)睑板腺护理(热敷和睑缘清洁),(2)睑脂挤压加睑板腺护理,(3)阿奇霉素滴眼液加睑板腺护理,(4)热脉动疗法加睑板腺护理,或(5)强脉冲光(IPL)疗法加睑板腺护理。根据基线时非接触式睑板腺造影确定的睑板腺评分,将每个治疗组的患者分为三个亚组。即使睑板腺评分较高(5或6),IPL组的眼睛也有改善,而睑板腺护理仅在睑板腺评分较低(1或2)时往往有效。因此,睑板腺评分可用于指导MGD患者选择最合适的治疗方法。需要进行前瞻性研究以证实这些结果。