• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伦理原则及一种实用方法,以支持在新冠疫情后续阶段及之后的政策制定。

Ethical principles and a practical approach to support policy making through the next phases of the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

作者信息

Fritz Zoë, Huppert Julian L, Liddell Kathleen, Holton Richard, Fuld Jonathan P

机构信息

The Healthcare Improvement Studies (THIS) Institute, Cambridge, UK and Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK

Jesus College, Cambridge; visiting professor in the Policy Institute, King's College London.

出版信息

Clin Med (Lond). 2021 Mar;21(2):e122-e125. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2020-0843. Epub 2020 Dec 29.

DOI:10.7861/clinmed.2020-0843
PMID:33376107
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8002807/
Abstract

There is an urgent need for an ethical framework to help us address the local and national challenges that we face as clinicians during the COVID-19 pandemic. We propose four key commitments from which a practical and consistent ethical approach can be derived. These commitments are to articulate the needs, rights and interests of the different stakeholders affected by any policy; to be accountable and transparent, recognising that people are autonomous individuals with values and concerns of their own; to consider the impact of our actions on the sustainability of the NHS, infrastructure, service demands and staff welfare; and to treat everybody equitably, with all deserving of consideration and care. Implementing these commitments will require a number of specific actions. We must put in place frameworks enabling clear advocacy for each competing objective; communicate policy and practice effectively to the public; promote integration of decision-making among social, primary, secondary and tertiary care and reduce or stop unnecessary or inefficient interventions; minimise health inequalities; and build spare capacity into the system.In this article, we expand on these actions, and note the legal context in which this would be delivered.

摘要

迫切需要一个道德框架来帮助我们应对在新冠疫情期间作为临床医生所面临的地方和国家层面的挑战。我们提出四项关键承诺,从中可以得出切实可行且一致的道德方法。这些承诺包括:阐明受任何政策影响的不同利益相关者的需求、权利和利益;做到问责和透明,认识到人们是有自身价值观和关切的自主个体;考虑我们的行动对国民医疗服务体系(NHS)的可持续性、基础设施、服务需求和员工福利的影响;公平对待每一个人,所有人都应得到考虑和关怀。落实这些承诺将需要采取一些具体行动。我们必须建立框架,以便为每个相互竞争的目标进行明确的倡导;有效地向公众传达政策和做法;促进社会、初级、二级和三级护理之间决策的整合,减少或停止不必要或低效的干预措施;尽量减少健康不平等现象;并在系统中建立备用能力。在本文中,我们详细阐述这些行动,并指出实施这些行动的法律背景。

相似文献

1
Ethical principles and a practical approach to support policy making through the next phases of the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.伦理原则及一种实用方法,以支持在新冠疫情后续阶段及之后的政策制定。
Clin Med (Lond). 2021 Mar;21(2):e122-e125. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2020-0843. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
2
Which ethical values underpin England's National Health Service reset of paediatric and maternity services following COVID-19: a rapid review.在 COVID-19 之后,英国国民保健制度对儿科和妇产科服务进行重置的伦理价值观基础是什么:快速审查。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 8;11(6):e049214. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049214.
3
Mental capacity legislation and communication disability: A cross-sectional survey exploring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the provision of specialist decision-making support by UK SLTs.精神能力立法和沟通障碍:一项横断面调查,旨在探讨 COVID-19 大流行对英国言语治疗师提供专业决策支持的影响。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2022 Jan;57(1):172-181. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12685. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
4
Integrating philosophy, policy and practice to create a just and fair health service.将哲学、政策和实践相结合,打造公正公平的医疗服务体系。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Dec;46(12):797-802. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106853. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
5
Children as an afterthought during COVID-19: defining a child-inclusive ethical framework for pandemic policymaking.将儿童置于 COVID-19 之后:为大流行决策制定定义一个包含儿童的伦理框架
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Dec 5;23(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00866-w.
6
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
7
REVISITING HEALTH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ETHICAL, LEGAL, and SOCIAL ISSUES and EVALUATION: TELEHEALTH/TELEMEDICINE and COVID-19.重新审视健康信息技术的伦理、法律和社会问题及评估:远程医疗/远程医学和 COVID-19。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Nov;143:104239. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104239. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
8
Ethics, Guidelines, Standards, and Policy: Telemedicine, COVID-19, and Broadening the Ethical Scope.伦理、准则、标准和政策:远程医疗、COVID-19 以及扩大伦理范围。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2022 Jan;31(1):105-118. doi: 10.1017/S0963180121000852.
9
A Framework for Improving Policy Priorities in Managing COVID-19 Challenges in Developing Countries.改善发展中国家应对 COVID-19 挑战的政策重点框架。
Front Public Health. 2020 Oct 14;8:589681. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.589681. eCollection 2020.
10
COVID-19: opportunities for public health ethics?COVID-19:公共卫生伦理学的机遇?
J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2021 Jun;51(S1):S47-S52. doi: 10.4997/JRCPE.2021.241.

本文引用的文献

1
Health justice in the Anthropocene: medical ethics and the Land Ethic.人类世的健康正义:医学伦理与土地伦理。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Dec;46(12):791-796. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106855. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
2
Integrating philosophy, policy and practice to create a just and fair health service.将哲学、政策和实践相结合,打造公正公平的医疗服务体系。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Dec;46(12):797-802. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106853. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
3
Balancing health worker well-being and duty to care: an ethical approach to staff safety in COVID-19 and beyond.平衡卫生工作者的福祉与照护职责:应对新冠疫情及未来保障工作人员安全的伦理方法
J Med Ethics. 2020 Sep 25. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106557.
4
Epidemiology of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes.COVID-19 流行病学:临床特征、危险因素和结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Virol. 2021 Mar;93(3):1449-1458. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26424. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
5
Bin it or pin it? Which professional ethical guidance on managing COVID-19 should I follow?弃用还是别针?我应该遵循哪条关于管理 COVID-19 的专业伦理准则?
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Jul 15;21(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00491-5.
6
Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic groups in England are at increased risk of death from COVID-19: indirect standardisation of NHS mortality data.英格兰的黑人、亚裔和少数族裔群体死于新冠病毒的风险更高:英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)死亡率数据的间接标准化
Wellcome Open Res. 2020 Jun 24;5:88. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15922.2. eCollection 2020.
7
Ethical road map through the covid-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间的道德路线图。
BMJ. 2020 May 21;369:m2033. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2033.
8
Who gets the ventilator? Important legal rights in a pandemic.谁能使用呼吸机?疫情中的重要法律权利。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Jul;46(7):421-426. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106332. Epub 2020 May 11.
9
Waste in the US Health Care System: Estimated Costs and Potential for Savings.美国医疗体系中的浪费:估计成本和节约潜力。
JAMA. 2019 Oct 15;322(15):1501-1509. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.13978.
10
The Moral Machine experiment.道德机器实验。
Nature. 2018 Nov;563(7729):59-64. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6. Epub 2018 Oct 24.