• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较社区生活方式干预措施以提高饮食和身体活动建议依从性的随机对照试验:VitalUM 研究。

A randomized controlled trial comparing community lifestyle interventions to improve adherence to diet and physical activity recommendations: the VitalUM study.

机构信息

Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 Mar;36(3):345-360. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00708-2. Epub 2020 Dec 30.

DOI:10.1007/s10654-020-00708-2
PMID:33377998
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8032577/
Abstract

Worldwide, adherence to national guidelines for physical activity (PA), and fruit and vegetable consumption is recommended to promote health and reduce the risk for (chronic) disease. This study reports on the effectiveness of various social-cognitive interventions to improve adherence to guidelines and the revealed adherence predictors. Participants (n = 1,629), aged 45-70 years, randomly selected and recruited in 2005-2006 from 23 Dutch general practices, were randomized (centralized stratified allocation) to four groups to receive a 12-month lifestyle intervention targeting guideline adherence for PA and fruit and vegetable consumption. Study groups received either four computer-tailored print communication (TPC) letters (n = 405), four telephone motivational interviewing (TMI) sessions (n = 407), a combined intervention (two TPC letters and two TMI sessions, n = 408), or no intervention (control group, n = 409). After the baseline assessment, all parties were aware of the treatment groups. Outcomes were measured with self-report postal questionnaires at baseline, 25, 47 and 73 weeks. For PA, all three interventions were associated with better guideline adherence than no intervention. Odds ratios for TPC, TMI and the combined intervention were 1.82 (95% CI 1.31; 2.54), 1.57 (95% CI 1.13; 2.18), and 2.08 (95% CI 1.50; 2.88), respectively. No pedometer effects were found. For fruit and vegetable consumption, TPC seemed superior to those in the other groups. Odd ratio for fruit and vegetable consumption were 1.78 (95% CI 1.32; 2.41) and 1.73 (95% CI 1.28; 2.33), respectively. For each behaviour, adherence was predicted by self-efficacy expectations, habit strength and stages of change, whereas sex, awareness and the number of action plans predicted guideline adherence for fruit and vegetable intake. The season predicted the guideline adherence for PA and fruit consumption. The odds ratios revealed were equivalent to modest effects sizes, although they were larger than those reported in systematic reviews. This study indicated that less resource intensive interventions might have the potential for a large public health impact when widely implemented. The strengths of this study were the participation of lower educated adults and evaluation of maintenance effects. (Trial NL1035, 2007-09-06).

摘要

在全球范围内,建议遵循国家有关体育活动(PA)和水果与蔬菜消费的指南,以促进健康并降低(慢性)疾病的风险。本研究报告了各种社会认知干预措施的有效性,这些措施旨在提高对指南的依从性,并揭示了依从性的预测因素。参与者(n=1629)年龄在 45-70 岁之间,于 2005-2006 年从 23 个荷兰综合诊所中随机选择并招募,随机(集中分层分配)分为四组,接受为期 12 个月的生活方式干预,旨在针对 PA 和水果与蔬菜消费的指南进行依从性。研究组分别接受了四种计算机定制印刷通讯(TPC)信(n=405)、四次电话动机访谈(TMI)会议(n=407)、联合干预(两次 TPC 信和两次 TMI 会议,n=408)或无干预(对照组,n=409)。在基线评估后,所有各方都知道了治疗组。在基线、25、47 和 73 周时,通过自我报告的邮政问卷测量结果。对于 PA,所有三种干预措施与无干预相比,均与更好的指南依从性相关。TPC、TMI 和联合干预的优势比分别为 1.82(95%CI 1.31;2.54)、1.57(95%CI 1.13;2.18)和 2.08(95%CI 1.50;2.88)。未发现计步器效果。对于水果和蔬菜的消费,TPC 似乎优于其他组。水果和蔬菜消费的比值分别为 1.78(95%CI 1.32;2.41)和 1.73(95%CI 1.28;2.33)。对于每种行为,自我效能期望、习惯强度和改变阶段预测了对指南的依从性,而性别、意识和行动计划的数量则预测了对水果和蔬菜摄入量的指南依从性。季节预测了 PA 和水果消费的指南依从性。显示的优势比相当于适度的效果大小,尽管它们大于系统评价中报告的那些。本研究表明,当广泛实施时,资源密集度较低的干预措施可能具有很大的公共卫生影响潜力。本研究的优势在于参与了教育程度较低的成年人,并评估了维持效果。(试验 NL1035,2007-09-06)。

相似文献

1
A randomized controlled trial comparing community lifestyle interventions to improve adherence to diet and physical activity recommendations: the VitalUM study.一项比较社区生活方式干预措施以提高饮食和身体活动建议依从性的随机对照试验:VitalUM 研究。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 Mar;36(3):345-360. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00708-2. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
2
Vitalum study design: RCT evaluating the efficacy of tailored print communication and telephone motivational interviewing on multiple health behaviors.Vitalum研究设计:一项随机对照试验,评估定制印刷宣传材料和电话动机性访谈对多种健康行为的疗效。
BMC Public Health. 2008 Jun 19;8:216. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-216.
3
Tailored print communication and telephone motivational interviewing are equally successful in improving multiple lifestyle behaviors in a randomized controlled trial.在一项随机对照试验中,定制印刷通讯和电话动机性访谈在改善多种生活方式行为方面同样成功。
Ann Behav Med. 2011 Feb;41(1):104-18. doi: 10.1007/s12160-010-9231-3.
4
Effectiveness of a Web-Based Computer-Tailored Multiple-Lifestyle Intervention for People Interested in Reducing their Cardiovascular Risk: A Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络的计算机定制多生活方式干预对有兴趣降低心血管风险人群的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 11;18(4):e78. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5147.
5
Cost-effectiveness of tailored print communication, telephone motivational interviewing, and a combination of the two: results of an economic evaluation alongside the Vitalum randomized controlled trial.定制印刷通讯、电话动机性访谈以及两者结合的成本效益:与 Vitalum 随机对照试验同时进行的经济评估结果。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 Sep 3;7:64. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-7-64.
6
Intervention Fidelity of Telephone Motivational Interviewing On Physical Activity, Fruit Intake, and Vegetable Consumption in Dutch Outpatients With and Without Hypertension.电话动机性访谈对荷兰高血压和非高血压门诊患者身体活动、水果摄入和蔬菜消费的干预忠实度。
Int J Behav Med. 2023 Feb;30(1):108-121. doi: 10.1007/s12529-022-10076-8. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
7
A randomized trial of tailoring and motivational interviewing to promote fruit and vegetable consumption for cancer prevention and control.一项旨在通过定制和动机访谈来促进水果和蔬菜消费以预防和控制癌症的随机试验。
Ann Behav Med. 2009 Oct;38(2):71-85. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9140-5.
8
Information processes mediate the effect of a health communication intervention on fruit and vegetable consumption.信息处理过程中介导了健康传播干预对水果和蔬菜消费的影响。
J Health Commun. 2011 Mar;16(3):282-99. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.532294.
9
Generating and predicting high quality action plans to facilitate physical activity and fruit and vegetable consumption: results from an experimental arm of a randomised controlled trial.生成并预测高质量行动计划以促进身体活动及水果和蔬菜消费:一项随机对照试验的实验分支结果
BMC Public Health. 2016 Apr 12;16:317. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2975-3.
10
Misperception of self-reported adherence to the fruit, vegetable and fish guidelines in older Dutch adults.荷兰老年人对自我报告的水果、蔬菜和鱼类指南依从性的错误认知。
Appetite. 2014 Nov;82:166-72. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.07.021. Epub 2014 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of vitamin C and hawthorn beverage formula on blood pressure and oxidative stress in heat-exposed workers: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.维生素 C 和山楂饮料配方对高温作业工人血压和氧化应激的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2024 Dec;33(4):503-514. doi: 10.6133/apjcn.202412_33(4).0005.
2
Efficacy of Health Promotion Interventions Aimed to Improve Health Gains in Middle-Aged Adults-A Systematic Review.旨在促进中年成年人健康改善的健康促进干预措施的效果——一项系统评价
Geriatrics (Basel). 2023 Apr 30;8(3):50. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics8030050.
3
Dietary outcomes of community-based CVD preventive interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Mediators of physical activity behaviour change interventions among adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.成人身体活动行为改变干预措施的中介因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Health Psychol Rev. 2021 Jun;15(2):272-286. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2019.1706614. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
2
Motivational Interviewing and Fruit/Vegetable Consumption in Older Adults.老年人的动机性访谈与水果/蔬菜消费
Clin Nurs Res. 2017 Dec;26(6):731-746. doi: 10.1177/1054773816673634. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
3
Counselor competence for telephone Motivation Interviewing addressing lifestyle change among Dutch older adults.
基于社区的 CVD 预防干预措施的饮食结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 Nov;26(11):2480-2491. doi: 10.1017/S1368980023000976. Epub 2023 May 16.
4
Intervention Fidelity of Telephone Motivational Interviewing On Physical Activity, Fruit Intake, and Vegetable Consumption in Dutch Outpatients With and Without Hypertension.电话动机性访谈对荷兰高血压和非高血压门诊患者身体活动、水果摄入和蔬菜消费的干预忠实度。
Int J Behav Med. 2023 Feb;30(1):108-121. doi: 10.1007/s12529-022-10076-8. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
荷兰老年人生活方式改变的电话动机访谈中咨询员的胜任能力。
Eval Program Plann. 2017 Dec;65:47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
4
Determinants of adherence to lifestyle intervention in adults with obesity: a systematic review.肥胖成年人生活方式干预依从性的决定因素:一项系统综述。
Clin Obes. 2017 Jun;7(3):123-135. doi: 10.1111/cob.12183. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
5
Multiple Risk Behavior Interventions: Meta-analyses of RCTs.多种风险行为干预:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Jul;53(1):e19-e30. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.032. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
6
Do activity monitors increase physical activity in adults with overweight or obesity? A systematic review and meta-analysis.活动监测器能否增加超重或肥胖成年人的身体活动?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016 Oct;24(10):2078-91. doi: 10.1002/oby.21619.
7
Scaling up physical activity interventions worldwide: stepping up to larger and smarter approaches to get people moving.在全球范围内扩大身体活动干预措施:采取更大规模、更明智的方法促使人们动起来。
Lancet. 2016 Sep 24;388(10051):1337-48. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30728-0. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
8
A systematic review of the effects of non-conscious regulatory processes in physical activity.非意识调节过程对身体活动影响的系统评价
Health Psychol Rev. 2016 Dec;10(4):395-407. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2016.1183505. Epub 2016 May 20.
9
The effectiveness of motivational interviewing for health behaviour change in primary care settings: a systematic review.动机性访谈在初级保健环境中促进健康行为改变的效果:系统评价。
Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9(2):205-23. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2014.882006. Epub 2014 Feb 12.
10
Personalized drinking feedback: A meta-analysis of in-person versus computer-delivered interventions.个性化饮酒反馈:面对面干预与计算机辅助干预的荟萃分析
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Apr;83(2):430-7. doi: 10.1037/a0038394. Epub 2014 Dec 8.