Mesters Ilse, Keulen Hilde M van, de Vries Hein, Brug Johannes
Department of Epidemiology, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Health Promotion, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands; TNO, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Eval Program Plann. 2017 Dec;65:47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
Counselor competence in telephone Motivation Interviewing (MI) to change lifestyle behaviors in a primary care population was assessed using the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) rating system. Counselor behavior was evaluated by trained raters. Twenty minutes of a random sample of 336 MI sessions were coded representing 232 counselees. Ninety-four sessions (28%) were double coded to assess inter-rater agreement. The MI fidelity was examined by comparing the MI fidelity scores direction, empathy, spirit, % open questions, % complex reflections, reflections-to-questions ratio, % MI-adherent responses with the matching beginner proficiency MITI threshold. The inter-rater agreements for the MI fidelity summary scores were good (spirit, reflections-to-questions ratio), fair (empathy, % open questions, % MI-adherent responses) or poor (direction, % complex reflection). The MI fidelity scores for direction, empathy, spirit and the percentage of complex reflections exceeded the MITI threshold, but lower scores were found for the percentage of open questions, the reflections-to-questions ratio and the percentage of MI-adherent responses. In conclusion, evidence that MI was implemented was revealed. However, the inter-rater agreements scores and some fidelity scores leave room for improvement indicating that raters and counselors may need more ongoing training and feedback to achieve and maintain adequate competence. These findings apply to more complex skills (as rating complex reflections) in particular.
使用动机性访谈治疗完整性(MITI)评分系统评估了初级保健人群中咨询师在通过电话进行动机性访谈(MI)以改变生活方式行为方面的能力。咨询师的行为由经过培训的评分者进行评估。从336次MI访谈的随机样本中抽取20分钟进行编码,代表232名咨询对象。对94次访谈(28%)进行了双重编码以评估评分者间的一致性。通过将MI保真度得分的方向、同理心、精神、开放式问题百分比、复杂反思百分比、反思与问题比率、MI依从性反应百分比与匹配的初学者熟练程度MITI阈值进行比较,来检查MI的保真度。MI保真度总结得分的评分者间一致性良好(精神、反思与问题比率)、中等(同理心、开放式问题百分比、MI依从性反应百分比)或较差(方向、复杂反思百分比)。方向、同理心、精神以及复杂反思百分比的MI保真度得分超过了MITI阈值,但开放式问题百分比、反思与问题比率以及MI依从性反应百分比的得分较低。总之,揭示了实施MI的证据。然而,评分者间一致性得分和一些保真度得分仍有改进空间,这表明评分者和咨询师可能需要更多持续培训和反馈,以达到并维持足够的能力。这些发现尤其适用于更复杂的技能(如对复杂反思进行评分)。