Suppr超能文献

随机临床试验比较了同时治疗和混合治疗根除幽门螺杆菌感染。

Randomised clinical trial comparing concomitant and hybrid therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Split, Split, Croatia.

Department of Pathophysiology, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Dec 30;15(12):e0244500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244500. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The primary objective of this study was to compare concomitant and hybrid therapy in the first line eradication treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in Split-Dalmatia County, Croatia, in which clarithromycin resistance is above 20%. The secondary objective of the study was to determine and compare compliance and adverse events rate between these therapeutic protocols.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In an open-label, randomised clinical trial 140 patients total with H. pylori infection were randomly assigned to either concomitant (esomeprazole 40 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, metronidazole 500 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, twice daily for 14 days) or hybrid (esomeprazole 40 mg and amoxicillin 1 g twice daily during 14 days with adding metronidazole 500 mg and clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily, in the last 7 days,) treatment group.

RESULTS

Eradication rates for concomitant group and hybrid therapy group were 84.1% (58/69) and 83.1% (59/71) respectively in the intention-to-treat analysis and 96.7% (58/60) and 95.2% (59/62) in per-protocol analysis. There was no significant difference between the groups (ITT analysis: P = 0.878; PP analysis: P = 0.675). Adverse events were more frequent in the concomitant group (33.3% vs 18.3%, P = 0.043). There was no difference among groups regarding compliance rate.

CONCLUSION

Hybrid therapy has similar eradication rate as concomitant therapy, with lower adverse events rate. In the era of increasing antibiotic resistance, eradication regime with less antibiotic's usage, as hybrid therapy, should be reasonable first line treatment choice for H. pylori infection. Clinical Trials, gov: NCT03572777.

摘要

背景

本研究的主要目的是比较克拉霉素耐药率超过 20%的克罗地亚斯普利特-达尔马提亚县幽门螺杆菌感染一线根除治疗中的联合治疗和混合治疗。本研究的次要目的是确定和比较这两种治疗方案的依从性和不良反应发生率。

材料和方法

在一项开放标签、随机临床试验中,共纳入 140 例幽门螺杆菌感染患者,随机分为联合治疗组(埃索美拉唑 40mg,阿莫西林 1g,甲硝唑 500mg,克拉霉素 500mg,每日 2 次,共 14 天)或混合治疗组(埃索美拉唑 40mg 和阿莫西林 1g,每日 2 次,共 14 天,在最后 7 天,每日 2 次添加甲硝唑 500mg 和克拉霉素 500mg)。

结果

意向治疗分析中,联合治疗组和混合治疗组的根除率分别为 84.1%(58/69)和 83.1%(59/71),按方案分析分别为 96.7%(58/60)和 95.2%(59/62)。两组间无显著差异(意向治疗分析:P=0.878;按方案分析:P=0.675)。联合治疗组不良反应更常见(33.3%比 18.3%,P=0.043)。两组的依从率无差异。

结论

混合治疗与联合治疗具有相似的根除率,不良反应发生率较低。在抗生素耐药率不断上升的时代,作为一种抗生素用量较少的根除方案,混合治疗应成为幽门螺杆菌感染的合理一线治疗选择。临床试验,注册号:NCT03572777。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2df7/7773256/c15c0642a526/pone.0244500.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验