J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Dec 1;44(6):371-399. doi: 10.17796/1053-4625-44.6.1.
The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the pain/anxiety levels associated with the anesthetic process by conventional and computer-controlled delivery systems (CCDS) in children. Four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Dentistry & Oral Science Source/EBSCO) were comprehensively explored for eligible studies, in English or Spanish, published from January 1995 to December 2019. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the PRISMA statement, including only randomized controlled clinical trials. An exhaustive search was performed in different electronic databases under a specific PICO-posed question. Relevant studies were selected based on titles and abstracts, and the full texts were retrieved. From these articles, important information was extracted. Wand demonstrated significantly lower pain than the conventional injection did. In the subgroup by pain scale analysis, the Facial Image Scale and Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale showed a significant difference in favor of the CCDS. In general, the reviewed evidence shows that less perceived pain and anxiety occur when the local anesthetic technique is performed with a CCDS than with the traditional technique.
本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是比较常规和计算机控制输送系统(CCDS)在儿童麻醉过程中相关的疼痛/焦虑水平。使用英文或西班牙文,从 1995 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月,我们全面搜索了四个电子数据库(PubMed、EMBASE、Scopus、Google Scholar 和 Dentistry & Oral Science Source/EBSCO)中符合条件的研究。根据 PRISMA 声明进行了系统文献综述和荟萃分析,仅包括随机对照临床试验。根据特定的 PICO 问题在不同的电子数据库中进行了详尽的搜索。基于标题和摘要选择了相关研究,并检索了全文。从这些文章中提取了重要信息。Wand 显示出比常规注射明显更低的疼痛水平。在疼痛量表分析的亚组中,面部图像量表和 Wong-Baker 面部疼痛量表显示出有利于 CCDS 的显著差异。总的来说,回顾的证据表明,与传统技术相比,使用 CCDS 进行局部麻醉技术时,感知到的疼痛和焦虑程度更低。