Suppr超能文献

成人不同垂直面型磨牙后间隙的定量评估。

Quantitative evaluation of retromolar space in adults with different vertical facial types.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2020 Nov 1;90(6):857-865. doi: 10.2319/121219-787.1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the differences in mandibular retromolar space among skeletal Class I subjects with different vertical divergence using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 123 skeletal Class I patients (aged 20-40 years) were categorized into hypodivergent, normodivergent, and hyperdivergent groups based on S-N/Go-Me and facial height index (FHI). Mandibular retromolar space was measured at four planes parallel to the occlusal plane along the sagittal line and molar cuspal line, respectively. The mandibular retromolar space was compared among the three vertical groups.

RESULTS

The hyperdivergent group had a significantly smaller mandibular retromolar space compared with the other two groups, while the hypodivergent group had the largest retromolar space. In addition, the hyperdivergent group had a larger number of subjects whose roots contacted the lingual cortex of the mandibular body.

CONCLUSIONS

The hyperdivergent group tends to exhibit the smallest mandibular retromolar space and highest risk of cortex contact. Clinicians should keep in mind that successful molar distalization requires sufficient retromolar space, especially for hyperdivergent subjects, which should be verified with CBCT.

摘要

目的

使用锥形束 CT(CBCT)研究不同垂直骨面型的骨性Ⅰ类患者下颌磨牙后间隙的差异。

材料与方法

根据 S-N/Go-Me 和面部高度指数(FHI),将 123 例骨性Ⅰ类患者(20-40 岁)分为低角型、均角型和高角型。沿矢状线和磨牙牙尖线,在与牙合平面平行的四个平面上测量下颌磨牙后间隙。比较三组垂直骨面型之间的下颌磨牙后间隙。

结果

与其他两组相比,高角型组的下颌磨牙后间隙明显较小,而低角型组的磨牙后间隙最大。此外,高角型组有更多的根接触到下颌体舌侧皮质。

结论

高角型组倾向于表现出最小的下颌磨牙后间隙和最高的根接触皮质风险。临床医生应牢记,磨牙远移成功需要有足够的磨牙后间隙,尤其是高角型患者,应使用 CBCT 进行验证。

相似文献

1
Quantitative evaluation of retromolar space in adults with different vertical facial types.
Angle Orthod. 2020 Nov 1;90(6):857-865. doi: 10.2319/121219-787.1.
2
Evaluation of bone area in the posterior region for mandibular molar distalization in class I and class III patients.
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 May;27(5):2041-2048. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04965-9. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
3
Assessment of mandibular retromolar space in adults with regard to third molar eruption status.
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Feb;27(2):671-680. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04782-6. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
4
Mandibular retromolar space in adults with different sagittal skeletal patterns: .
Angle Orthod. 2022 Sep 1;92(5):606-612. doi: 10.2319/112021-854.1. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
8
Bone availability for mandibular molar distalization in adults with mandibular prognathism.
Angle Orthod. 2018 Jan;88(1):52-57. doi: 10.2319/040617-237.1. Epub 2017 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

3
Three-dimensional finite element study of mandibular first molar distalization with clear aligner.
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Aug 1;41(4):405-413. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2023.2023021.
4
Classification of Maxillofacial Morphology by Artificial Intelligence Using Cephalometric Analysis Measurements.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 21;13(13):2134. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13132134.
5
Evaluation of bone area in the posterior region for mandibular molar distalization in class I and class III patients.
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 May;27(5):2041-2048. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04965-9. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
8
Mandibular retromolar space in adults with different sagittal skeletal patterns: .
Angle Orthod. 2022 Sep 1;92(5):606-612. doi: 10.2319/112021-854.1. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
9
Anatomical limitations and factors influencing molar distalization.
Angle Orthod. 2022 May 23;92(5):598-605. doi: 10.2319/092921-731.1.
10
Match of the Bimaxillary Basal Bone Arches and Its Variations among Individuals.
Scanning. 2021 Nov 5;2021:9625893. doi: 10.1155/2021/9625893. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Biomechanical analysis for total distalization of the mandibular dentition: A finite element study.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019 Mar;155(3):388-397. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2018.05.014.
3
Bone availability for mandibular molar distalization in adults with mandibular prognathism.
Angle Orthod. 2018 Jan;88(1):52-57. doi: 10.2319/040617-237.1. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
4
Finite-element analysis of the center of resistance of the mandibular dentition.
Korean J Orthod. 2017 Jan;47(1):21-30. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2017.47.1.21. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
5
Effect of age on bite force.
J Oral Sci. 2016;58(3):361-3. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.15-0675.
6
Treatment effects of mandibular total arch distalization using a ramal plate.
Korean J Orthod. 2016 Jul;46(4):212-9. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2016.46.4.212. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
8
Pain and discomfort following insertion of miniscrews and premolar extractions: A randomized controlled trial.
Angle Orthod. 2016 Nov;86(6):891-899. doi: 10.2319/123115-899.1. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
9
Mandibular posterior anatomic limit for molar distalization.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Aug;146(2):190-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.04.021.
10
Association between mandibular third molar formation and retromolar space.
Angle Orthod. 2014 Nov;84(6):946-50. doi: 10.2319/120113-883.1. Epub 2014 Apr 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验