• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

压力性损伤预防障碍问卷在西班牙医院护士中的编制及验证。

Development and validation of the Pressure Injury Prevention Barriers questionnaire in hospital nurses in Spain.

机构信息

Nursing, University of Jaén, Jaen, Andalucía, Spain.

Nursing, University of Jaén, Jaen, Andalucía, Spain

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 30;10(12):e041376. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041376.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041376
PMID:33380485
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7780508/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a new questionnaire to measure the nurses' perceptions of the barriers towards the prevention of pressure injuries (PIs) at hospitals.

DESIGN

Validation study with mixed methods.

SETTING

Four university hospitals in southern Spain.

PARTICIPANTS

The questionnaire was developed based on a literature review. A panel of 14 wound care experts rated the content validity. A sample of 438 nurses (registered nurses and assistant nurses) participated in the survey.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The psychometric properties of the Pressure Injury Prevention Barriers (PIPB) questionnaire evaluated were: content validity, internal consistency reliability and construct validity.

RESULTS

The final version of the questionnaire has 25 items grouped into four factors (management and organisation, motivation and priority, knowledge, and staff and collaboration). The confirmatory factor analysis showed good fit and error indices for the model (Comparative Fit Index=0.92, root mean square error of approximation=0.074). Cronbach's alpha was 0.90 (overall), and 0.89 (factor 1), 0.75 (factor 2), 0.72 (factor 3) and 0.45 (factor 4). Construct validity was good, demonstrated by the expected association with the scores on patient safety culture and on considering PIs as an adverse effect of hospital stay, but not with attitude score.

CONCLUSION

The PIPB questionnaire is an instrument useful for measuring nurses' perceptions of the barriers to PIs prevention. The initial evidence shows that the questionnaire has good content validity, internal consistency and adequate construct validity. Relevance and comprehensiveness need to be assessed in further studies. It can be used both in research and in the evaluation of clinical settings to implementation of PIs preventive programmes in hospitals.

摘要

目的

开发并验证一种新的问卷,以测量护士对预防医院压疮(PI)障碍的认知。

设计

混合方法验证研究。

地点

西班牙南部的四家大学医院。

参与者

该问卷基于文献综述开发。一个由 14 名伤口护理专家组成的小组对内容效度进行了评估。共有 438 名护士(注册护士和助理护士)参与了调查。

主要结果测量

评估了压力性损伤预防障碍(PIPB)问卷的心理测量特性:内容效度、内部一致性信度和构念效度。

结果

问卷的最终版本有 25 个项目,分为四个因素(管理和组织、动机和优先级、知识以及员工和协作)。验证性因子分析显示模型拟合良好,误差指数适中(比较拟合指数=0.92,均方根误差近似值=0.074)。克朗巴赫α系数为 0.90(总体),0.89(因素 1),0.75(因素 2),0.72(因素 3)和 0.45(因素 4)。构念效度良好,与患者安全文化得分和将 PI 视为住院不良后果的预期相关性表明,但与态度得分无关。

结论

PIPB 问卷是一种用于测量护士对预防 PI 障碍认知的有用工具。初步证据表明,该问卷具有良好的内容效度、内部一致性和足够的构念效度。需要在进一步的研究中评估相关性和全面性。它可用于研究和评估临床环境,以在医院实施 PI 预防计划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f4d/7780508/157c4918722a/bmjopen-2020-041376f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f4d/7780508/157c4918722a/bmjopen-2020-041376f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f4d/7780508/157c4918722a/bmjopen-2020-041376f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of the Pressure Injury Prevention Barriers questionnaire in hospital nurses in Spain.压力性损伤预防障碍问卷在西班牙医院护士中的编制及验证。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 30;10(12):e041376. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041376.
2
Development and Psychometric Properties of the Pressure Injury Prevention Knowledge Questionnaire in Spanish Nurses.西班牙语护士压力性损伤预防知识问卷的编制及心理测量学特性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 28;17(9):3063. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093063.
3
Attitudes of Spanish Nurses towards Pressure Injury Prevention and Psychometric Characteristics of the Spanish Version of the APuP Instrument.西班牙护士对压力性损伤预防的态度及 APuP 工具西班牙语版的心理测量学特征。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 18;17(22):8543. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228543.
4
Nurses' evidence-based knowledge and self-efficacy in venous access device insertion and management: Development and validation of a questionnaire.护士在静脉置管和管理方面的循证知识和自我效能:问卷的编制和验证。
Nurs Open. 2024 Jul;11(7):e2177. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2177.
5
Psychometric properties of an instrument measuring communication within and between the professional groups licensed practical nurses and registered nurses in anaesthetic clinics.测量麻醉诊室内外执业护士(注册护士和执业护士)之间沟通的工具的心理测量学特性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 10;19(1):950. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4805-7.
6
Questionnaire to Evaluate the Competency in Evidence-Based Practice of Registered Nurses (EBP-COQ Prof©): Development and Psychometric Validation.评估注册护士循证实践能力的问卷 (EBP-COQ Prof©):开发与心理测量学验证。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2020 Oct;17(5):366-375. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12464. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
7
Assessing the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), German language version in Swiss university hospitals--a validation study.评估安全态度问卷(SAQ),德语版,瑞士大学医院-验证研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Sep 10;13:347. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-347.
8
Application of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) in Albanian hospitals: a cross-sectional study.安全态度问卷(SAQ)在阿尔巴尼亚医院中的应用:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 15;5(4):e006528. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006528.
9
Development and Psychometric Testing of a Knowledge Instrument on Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis for Clinicians: The Know-IAD.开发并心理计量测试临床医护人员失禁相关性皮炎知识工具:失禁相关性皮炎知识量表(Know-IAD)。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2022;49(1):70-77. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000837.
10
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the attitude towards pressure ulcer prevention instrument: A cross-sectional survey.中文版压疮预防态度量表的心理计量学特性:横断面调查。
Int Wound J. 2022 Dec;19(8):2019-2030. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13802. Epub 2022 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Content Validity and Reliability of the Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Test and the Knowledge Level of Portuguese Nurses at Long-Term Care Units: A Cross-Sectional Survey.压疮知识测试的内容效度与信度以及长期护理单位葡萄牙护士的知识水平:一项横断面调查。
J Clin Med. 2022 Jan 24;11(3):583. doi: 10.3390/jcm11030583.

本文引用的文献

1
Attitudes of Spanish Nurses towards Pressure Injury Prevention and Psychometric Characteristics of the Spanish Version of the APuP Instrument.西班牙护士对压力性损伤预防的态度及 APuP 工具西班牙语版的心理测量学特征。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 18;17(22):8543. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228543.
2
Practice on pressure ulcer prevention among nurses in selected public hospitals, Tigray, Ethiopia.在埃塞俄比亚提格雷州部分公立医院中护士进行压疮预防的实践。
BMC Res Notes. 2020 Apr 10;13(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05049-7.
3
The pressure injury predictive model: A framework for hospital-acquired pressure injuries.
压力性损伤预测模型:医院获得性压力性损伤的框架。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Apr;29(7-8):1398-1421. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15171. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
4
Do we still need to assess nurses' attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention? A systematic review.我们是否仍需评估护士对压疮预防的态度?一项系统综述。
J Wound Care. 2019 Dec 2;28(12):795-806. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.12.795.
5
The prevalence of pressure ulcers in Europe, what does the European data tell us: a systematic review.欧洲压疮的患病率:欧洲数据告诉了我们什么?一项系统综述
J Wound Care. 2019 Nov 2;28(11):710-719. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.11.710.
6
Health professionals' perspectives on delivering patient-focused wound management: a qualitative study.医疗专业人员对提供以患者为中心的伤口管理的看法:一项定性研究。
J Wound Care. 2019 Jul 1;28(Sup7):S4-S13. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.Sup7.S4.
7
Modifiable patient-related factors associated with pressure ulcers on the sacrum and heels: Secondary data analyses.与骶骨和足跟部压疮相关的可改变的患者相关因素:二次数据分析。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Nov;75(11):2773-2785. doi: 10.1111/jan.14149. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
8
Reexamining the Literature on Terminal Ulcers, SCALE, Skin Failure, and Unavoidable Pressure Injuries.重新审视关于终末期溃疡、SCALE、皮肤衰竭和不可避免的压力性损伤的文献。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2019 Mar;32(3):109-121. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000553112.55505.5f.
9
Wound Curriculum for Nurses: Post-registration qualification wound management - european qualification framework level 6.护士伤口护理课程:注册后资格伤口管理——欧洲资格框架6级
J Wound Care. 2019 Feb 1;28(Sup2a):S1-S33. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.Sup2a.S1.
10
The prevalence of pressure ulcers in community-dwelling older adults: A study in an Indonesian city.社区居住的老年人中压疮的流行情况:印度尼西亚城市的一项研究。
Int Wound J. 2019 Apr;16(2):534-541. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13081. Epub 2019 Feb 15.