• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西班牙语护士压力性损伤预防知识问卷的编制及心理测量学特性。

Development and Psychometric Properties of the Pressure Injury Prevention Knowledge Questionnaire in Spanish Nurses.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 28;17(9):3063. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093063.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17093063
PMID:32354041
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7246611/
Abstract

Pressure injuries (PIs) are a major health problem with severe implications for patients. Professionals who care for people at risk should have high knowledge about PIs prevention. The actual knowledge can be measured using different tools, but we have found no questionnaire to measure the knowledge on PIs prevention developed and validated for Spanish-speaking countries. The aim of this study was to develop a questionnaire in Spanish to measure the knowledge about PIs prevention based on current international guidelines. Content validity was evaluated by 12 experts in wound care. A convenience sample of 438 nursing professionals from Spain participated to evaluate the questionnaire using item analysis, Rasch model, and known-groups validity. The PI Prevention Knowledge (PIPK) questionnaire shows good discrimination and difficulty indices. The 31-item PIPK shows good fit and reliability of 0.98 for items and 0.72 for people; also, it has enough evidence for construct validity. Because the questionnaire has been developed based on the recommendations from international guidelines, the English version of this questionnaire could be used in further studies to test its psychometric properties.

摘要

压力性损伤(PI)是一个严重影响患者的主要健康问题。护理高危人群的专业人员应该具备关于 PI 预防的高度知识。实际知识可以使用不同的工具来衡量,但我们还没有发现为西班牙语国家开发和验证的用于衡量 PI 预防知识的问卷。本研究旨在根据当前的国际指南开发一种西班牙语问卷来衡量 PI 预防知识。内容有效性由 12 名伤口护理专家进行评估。来自西班牙的 438 名护理专业人员的便利样本参与了使用项目分析、Rasch 模型和已知组有效性来评估问卷。PI 预防知识(PIPK)问卷显示出良好的区分度和难度指数。31 项的 PIPK 具有良好的拟合度和项目 0.98 的可靠性以及人员 0.72 的可靠性;此外,它还有足够的结构有效性证据。由于该问卷是根据国际指南的建议开发的,因此可以在进一步的研究中使用此问卷的英文版本来测试其心理测量特性。

相似文献

1
Development and Psychometric Properties of the Pressure Injury Prevention Knowledge Questionnaire in Spanish Nurses.西班牙语护士压力性损伤预防知识问卷的编制及心理测量学特性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 28;17(9):3063. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093063.
2
Development and validation of the Pressure Injury Prevention Barriers questionnaire in hospital nurses in Spain.压力性损伤预防障碍问卷在西班牙医院护士中的编制及验证。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 30;10(12):e041376. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041376.
3
Attitudes of Spanish Nurses towards Pressure Injury Prevention and Psychometric Characteristics of the Spanish Version of the APuP Instrument.西班牙护士对压力性损伤预防的态度及 APuP 工具西班牙语版的心理测量学特征。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 18;17(22):8543. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228543.
4
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of The Pressure Injury Prevention Knowledge Questionnaire(PIPK).《压力性损伤预防知识问卷》(PIPK)土耳其语版本的效度和信度
J Tissue Viability. 2022 Feb;31(1):30-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.11.002. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
5
Measuring knowledge of Alzheimer's: development and psychometric testing of the UJA Alzheimer's Care Scale.阿尔茨海默病知识测量:UJA 阿尔茨海默病护理量表的开发和心理测量学测试。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Mar 4;19(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1086-2.
6
Development and psychometric validation of PUKAT 2·0, a knowledge assessment tool for pressure ulcer prevention.PUKAT 2.0 的制定与心理计量验证,一种用于预防压力性溃疡的知识评估工具。
Int Wound J. 2017 Dec;14(6):1041-1051. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12758. Epub 2017 May 26.
7
Pressure ulcer prevention: development and psychometric validation of a knowledge assessment instrument.压力性溃疡预防:知识评估工具的开发和心理测量学验证。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Apr;47(4):399-410. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.08.010. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
8
Student nurses' knowledge and skills of children's environmental health: Instrument development and psychometric analysis using item response theory.学生护士的儿童环境卫生知识和技能:使用项目反应理论开发工具和心理测量分析。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Oct;69:113-119. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.07.008. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
9
Medical device-related pressure injury knowledge assessment for nurses: development and psychometric validation of a multiple choice test.护士医疗器械相关性压力性损伤知识评估:多项选择测试的编制与心理测量学验证。
J Wound Care. 2023 Jun 1;32(Sup6a):lxxv-lxxxvi. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2023.32.Sup6a.lxxv.
10
Validation of the Spanish Version of the Dementia Knowledge Assessment Tool 2.痴呆症知识评估工具 2 西班牙语版的验证。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;65(4):1175-1183. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180290.

引用本文的文献

1
A psychometric analysis for the adaptation of the comprehensive breast cancer knowledge test for the male population: a methodological study.针对男性群体改编综合乳腺癌知识测试的心理测量学分析:一项方法学研究。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 23;13:1535564. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1535564. eCollection 2025.
2
Nurses' Knowledge Concerning Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers.护士关于压疮防治的知识
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2023;1425:603-608. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-31986-0_58.
3
Development of Smart Clothing to Prevent Pressure Injuries in Bedridden Persons and/or with Severely Impaired Mobility: 4NoPressure Research Protocol.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of pressure ulcers in long-term care: a global review.长期护理中压疮的患病率:一项全球综述。
J Wound Care. 2019 Nov 2;28(11):702-709. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2019.28.11.702.
2
Incidence of pressure ulcers in intensive care units and direct costs of treatment: Evidence from Iran.重症监护病房压疮的发生率及直接治疗成本:来自伊朗的证据。
J Tissue Viability. 2019 May;28(2):70-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
3
An overview of co-morbidities and the development of pressure ulcers among older adults.老年患者合并症概述及压疮的发生发展。
开发智能服装以预防卧床者和/或行动严重受限者的压力性损伤:4NoPressure研究方案。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 9;11(10):1361. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11101361.
4
Attitudes of Spanish Nurses towards Pressure Injury Prevention and Psychometric Characteristics of the Spanish Version of the APuP Instrument.西班牙护士对压力性损伤预防的态度及 APuP 工具西班牙语版的心理测量学特征。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 18;17(22):8543. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228543.
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Dec 11;18(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0997-7.
4
Tracking pressure injuries as adverse events: National use of the Global Trigger Tool over a 4-year period.追踪压力性损伤作为不良事件:全球触发工具在 4 年期间的国家使用情况。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Feb;25(1):21-27. doi: 10.1111/jep.12996. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
5
Prevalence of pressure ulcer and associated risk factors in middle- and older-aged medical inpatients in Norway.挪威中老年住院患者压疮的患病率及相关危险因素。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Feb;27(3-4):e535-e543. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14088. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
6
A Descriptive, Cross-sectional Survey of Turkish Nurses' Knowledge of Pressure Ulcer Risk, Prevention, and Staging.一项关于土耳其护士对压疮风险、预防及分期知识的描述性横断面调查。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2017 Jun;63(6):40-46.
7
Development and psychometric validation of PUKAT 2·0, a knowledge assessment tool for pressure ulcer prevention.PUKAT 2.0 的制定与心理计量验证,一种用于预防压力性溃疡的知识评估工具。
Int Wound J. 2017 Dec;14(6):1041-1051. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12758. Epub 2017 May 26.
8
Predictive Factors for Pressure Ulcers in an Older Adult Population Hospitalized for Hip Fractures: A Prognostic Cohort Study.髋部骨折住院老年人群压力性溃疡的预测因素:一项预后队列研究
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 9;12(1):e0169909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169909. eCollection 2017.
9
Pressure injury prevalence in intensive care versus non-intensive care patients: A state-wide comparison.重症监护与非重症监护患者的压疮发生率:全州范围比较。
Aust Crit Care. 2017 Sep;30(5):244-250. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2016.12.003. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
10
Pressure ulcer prevalence and prevention practices: a cross-sectional comparative survey in Norway and Ireland.压疮患病率及预防措施:挪威和爱尔兰的一项横断面比较调查
J Wound Care. 2015 Aug;24(8):333-9. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2015.24.8.333.