• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肩部稳定手术后达到最大医学改善可能需要长达1年时间:一项系统评价。

Maximal Medical Improvement Following Shoulder Stabilization Surgery May Require up to 1 Year: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Patel Bhavik H, Lu Yining, Agarwalla Avinesh, Puzzitiello Richard N, Nwachukwu Benedict U, Cvetanovich Gregory L, Chahla Jorge, Forsythe Brian

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA.

出版信息

HSS J. 2020 Dec;16(Suppl 2):534-543. doi: 10.1007/s11420-020-09773-5. Epub 2020 Sep 10.

DOI:10.1007/s11420-020-09773-5
PMID:33380993
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7749924/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is increased emphasis on properly allocating healthcare resources to optimize value within orthopedic surgery. Establishing time to maximal medical improvement (MMI) can inform clinical decision-making and practice guidelines.

PURPOSE

We sought (1) to evaluate the time to MMI as predicted by commonly used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for evaluation of shoulder stabilization and (2) to evaluate typical time to return to sports and employment following surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review of the Medline database was conducted to identify outcome studies reporting sequential follow-up at multiple time points, up to a minimum of 2 years after shoulder stabilization surgery. The included studies examined the outcomes of arthroscopic or open surgical techniques on anterior instability. Clinically significant improvements were evaluated utilizing the minimal clinically important difference specific to each PROM. Secondary outcomes included range of motion, return to sport/work, and recurrent instability.

RESULTS

Ten studies comprising 590 surgically managed cases of anterior shoulder instability were included (78% arthroscopic, 22% open). Clinically significant improvements in PROMs were achieved up to 1 year post-operatively for Rowe, Western Ontario Instability Index (WOSI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores. For the three most utilized tools (Rowe, WOSI, ASES), the majority of improvement occurred in the first 6 post-operative months. Clinically significant improvements in Constant Score and Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS) were achieved up to 6 months and 2 years after surgery, respectively. No clinically significant improvements were achieved on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) tool.

CONCLUSION

Maximal medical improvement as determined by commonly utilized PROMs occurs by 1 year after operative management of anterior shoulder instability. The DASH tool does not appear to demonstrate a reliable time frame for clinically significant outcome improvement.

摘要

背景

在骨科手术中,人们越来越强调合理分配医疗资源以优化价值。确定达到最大医学改善(MMI)的时间可以为临床决策和实践指南提供参考。

目的

我们旨在(1)评估常用的患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)预测的肩部稳定评估达到MMI的时间,以及(2)评估术后恢复运动和工作的典型时间。

方法

对Medline数据库进行系统综述,以识别报告在多个时间点进行序贯随访的结局研究,随访时间至少为肩部稳定手术后2年。纳入的研究检查了关节镜或开放手术技术治疗前向不稳定的结局。利用每种PROM特有的最小临床重要差异评估临床显著改善情况。次要结局包括活动范围、恢复运动/工作情况以及复发性不稳定。

结果

纳入了10项研究,共590例接受手术治疗的前肩不稳定病例(78%为关节镜手术,22%为开放手术)。对于Rowe评分、西安大略不稳定指数(WOSI)、美国肩肘外科医师学会(ASES)评分和简单肩部试验(SST)评分,术后1年内实现了临床显著改善。对于三种最常用的工具(Rowe评分WOSI、ASES),大部分改善发生在术后的前6个月。Constant评分和牛津肩部不稳定评分(OSIS)分别在术后6个月和2年实现了临床显著改善。上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)工具未实现临床显著改善。

结论

常用PROMs确定的最大医学改善在肩部前向不稳定手术治疗后第1年出现。DASH工具似乎未显示出临床显著结局改善的可靠时间框架。

相似文献

1
Maximal Medical Improvement Following Shoulder Stabilization Surgery May Require up to 1 Year: A Systematic Review.肩部稳定手术后达到最大医学改善可能需要长达1年时间:一项系统评价。
HSS J. 2020 Dec;16(Suppl 2):534-543. doi: 10.1007/s11420-020-09773-5. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
2
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Open Bristow-Latarjet for Shoulder Instability: A Matched-Pair Multicenter Study Focused on Return to Sport.关节镜下Bankart修复术与开放Bristow-Latarjet手术治疗肩关节不稳的比较:一项聚焦于恢复运动的配对多中心研究
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Dec;44(12):3198-3205. doi: 10.1177/0363546516658037. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
3
Arthroscopic Versus Open Stabilization for Anterior Shoulder Subluxations.关节镜下与开放稳定治疗前肩半脱位。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2015 Jan 23;3(1):2325967115571084. doi: 10.1177/2325967115571084. eCollection 2015 Jan.
4
The Responsiveness of Patient- Reported Outcome Tools in Shoulder Surgery Is Dependent on the Underlying Pathological Condition.患者报告结局工具在肩部手术中的反应性取决于潜在的病理状况。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jan;47(1):241-247. doi: 10.1177/0363546517749213. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
5
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Show No Relevant Change Between 1-Year and 2-Year Follow-Up After Treatment for Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review.患者报告的结局指标显示,前肩不稳治疗后1年和2年随访之间无相关变化:一项系统评价。
Arthroscopy. 2025 Jun;41(6):2090-2102.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.08.031. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
6
Limited Predictive Value of the Instability Severity Index Score: Evaluation of 217 Consecutive Cases of Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability.不稳定严重程度指数评分的预测价值有限:217 例复发性前肩不稳定连续病例的评估。
Arthroscopy. 2021 May;37(5):1381-1391. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.12.185. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
7
The Responsiveness and Minimal Important Change of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index and Oxford Shoulder Instability Score.西部 Ontario 肩不稳定指数和牛津肩不稳定评分的反应性和最小重要变化。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Jun;47(6):402-410. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.6548. Epub 2017 May 12.
8
The open latarjet procedure is more reliable in terms of shoulder stability than arthroscopic bankart repair.就肩部稳定性而言,开放Latarjet手术比关节镜下Bankart修复术更可靠。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Aug;472(8):2345-51. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3550-9.
9
Return to Sport After Surgical Treatment for Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review.术后前肩不稳的重返运动:系统评价。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 May;47(6):1507-1515. doi: 10.1177/0363546518780934. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
10
Open Latarjet Procedures Produce Better Outcomes in Competitive Athletes Compared With Recreational Athletes: A Clinical Comparative Study of 106 Athletes Aged Under 30 Years.开放型 Latarjet 手术在竞技运动员中比在娱乐性运动员中产生更好的结果:106 名年龄在 30 岁以下运动员的临床对比研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 May;46(6):1408-1415. doi: 10.1177/0363546518759730. Epub 2018 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Why do patients with anterior shoulder instability not return to sport after surgery? A systematic review of 63 studies comprising 3545 patients.为什么肩关节前不稳定患者术后不能恢复运动?对63项研究(共3545例患者)的系统评价。
JSES Int. 2023 Jan 20;7(3):376-384. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.01.001. eCollection 2023 May.
2
[Research progress in biomechanics of Bristow-Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder dislocation].[肩关节前脱位Bristow-Latarjet手术生物力学研究进展]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 May 15;37(5):518-525. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202210059.

本文引用的文献

1
Is the Instability Severity Index Score a Valid Tool for Predicting Failure After Primary Arthroscopic Stabilization for Anterior Glenohumeral Instability?初次关节镜稳定术治疗复发性肩关节前不稳定后,不稳定严重程度指数评分是否为一种有效的失败预测工具?
Arthroscopy. 2019 Feb;35(2):361-366. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.09.027. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
2
Timeline for Maximal Subjective Outcome Improvement After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建后最大主观结局改善的时间轴。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Aug;47(10):2501-2509. doi: 10.1177/0363546518803365. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
3
Risk Factors for Recurrence of Anterior-Inferior Instability of the Shoulder After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Patients Younger Than 30 Years.30 岁以下患者肩关节镜下 Bankart 修复术后前下盂唇关节囊复合体不稳复发的危险因素。
Arthroscopy. 2018 Sep;34(9):2530-2536. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.03.032.
4
Return to Sport After Surgical Treatment for Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review.术后前肩不稳的重返运动:系统评价。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 May;47(6):1507-1515. doi: 10.1177/0363546518780934. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
5
Treatment after traumatic shoulder dislocation: a systematic review with a network meta-analysis.创伤性肩关节脱位后的治疗:系统评价与网络荟萃分析。
Br J Sports Med. 2018 Dec;52(23):1498-1506. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098539. Epub 2018 Jun 23.
6
Measuring Quality and Outcomes in Sports Medicine.衡量运动医学的质量与结果
Clin Sports Med. 2018 Jul;37(3):463-482. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2018.03.001.
7
Borderline Glenoid Bone Defect in Anterior Shoulder Instability: Latarjet Procedure Versus Bankart Repair.肩锁关节前向不稳定中的边缘型肩胛盂骨缺损:Latarjet 术与 Bankart 修复术的比较。
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;46(9):2170-2176. doi: 10.1177/0363546518776978. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
8
Establishing maximal medical improvement after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.解剖型全肩关节置换术后的最大程度医学改善。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Sep;27(9):1711-1720. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 May 2.
9
Outcomes of the Latarjet Procedure Compared With Bankart Repair for Recurrent Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability.Latarjet 手术与 Bankart 修复治疗复发性创伤性肩关节前不稳定的疗效比较。
J Athl Train. 2018 Feb;53(2):181-183. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-232-16. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
10
Minimal clinically important differences in Rowe and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index scores after arthroscopic repair of anterior shoulder instability.关节镜修复肩前不稳定后 Rowe 和 Western Ontario 肩不稳定指数评分的最小临床重要差异。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Apr;27(4):579-584. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.10.032. Epub 2017 Dec 15.