• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会经济地位是否会影响慢性病患者的医院利用和健康结果?

Does socioeconomic status affect hospital utilization and health outcomes of chronic disease patients?

机构信息

Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne, L5, 111 Barry Street, FBE Building, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Mar;22(2):329-339. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01255-z. Epub 2021 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-020-01255-z
PMID:33389255
Abstract

This study quantifies the extent socioeconomic status (SES) affects hospital utilization and adverse hospital events of chronic disease patients. After identifying the initial first-year spell of the disease, we examine six outcomes that include measures of utilization and incidence of adverse in-hospital events. Three years of hospital administrative data from the state of Victoria, Australia, are used to extract a sample of 237,743 patients with chronic disease spells. SES is measured using the utilization records of specific health and human services. The study finds that, compared to patients with no disadvantage, SES disadvantaged patients tend to incur higher hospital costs and longer utilization by about 20% and greater incidence of in-hospital adverse outcomes by up to 80% than non-disadvantaged patients. Further analysis shows that hospital adverse outcomes indirectly contribute to about a quarter of the observed difference in hospital costs between SES disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged patients.

摘要

这项研究量化了社会经济地位(SES)对慢性病患者住院利用和不良医院事件的影响程度。在确定疾病的初始年度病程后,我们检查了包括利用措施和住院不良事件发生率在内的六个结果。我们使用来自澳大利亚维多利亚州的三年医院管理数据,提取了 237743 名慢性病患者的样本。SES 是通过特定卫生和人类服务的利用记录来衡量的。研究发现,与无劣势的患者相比,SES 劣势患者的住院费用往往高出约 20%,利用时间延长约 20%,住院不良结果的发生率高出多达 80%。进一步的分析表明,医院不良结果间接导致 SES 劣势和非劣势患者之间观察到的医院费用差异的四分之一左右。

相似文献

1
Does socioeconomic status affect hospital utilization and health outcomes of chronic disease patients?社会经济地位是否会影响慢性病患者的医院利用和健康结果?
Eur J Health Econ. 2021 Mar;22(2):329-339. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01255-z. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
2
Socioeconomic Equity in the Receipt of In-Hospital Care and Outcomes in Australian Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients: The CONCORDANCE Registry.澳大利亚急性冠状动脉综合征患者住院治疗及预后的社会经济公平性:CONCORDANCE注册研究
Heart Lung Circ. 2018 Dec;27(12):1398-1405. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.08.019. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
3
Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Care After Myocardial Infarction in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.国家心血管数据登记处中心肌梗死患者的邻里社会经济劣势与护理情况
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Jun;11(6):e004054. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004054.
4
Association of Pediatric Inpatient Socioeconomic Status With Hospital Efficiency and Financial Balance.儿科住院患者社会经济地位与医院效率和财务平衡的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1913656. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.13656.
5
Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.社会经济地位对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者临床结局的影响
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Jan;12(1):e004979. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004979.
6
Hospital admissions by socio-economic status: does the 'inverse care law' apply to older Australians?按社会经济地位划分的住院情况:“逆医疗法则”适用于澳大利亚老年人吗?
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2006 Oct;30(5):467-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2006.tb00466.x.
7
An exploration of the complex relationship of socioecologic factors in the treatment and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction in disadvantaged populations.对弱势群体急性心肌梗死治疗及预后中社会生态因素复杂关系的探索。
Health Serv Res. 2001 Aug;36(4):711-32.
8
Socioeconomic disparities in access to ART treatment and the differential impact of a policy that increased consumer costs.社会经济差异对接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的影响,以及一项增加消费者成本的政策的不同影响。
Hum Reprod. 2013 Nov;28(11):3111-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det302. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
9
The effect of socioeconomic status on outcomes for seriously ill patients: a linked data cohort study.社会经济地位对重症患者预后的影响:一项关联数据队列研究。
Med J Aust. 2008 Jul 7;189(1):26-30. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01890.x.
10
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease hospitalisations and mortality in Victoria: analysis of variations by socioeconomic status.维多利亚州慢性阻塞性肺疾病的住院率和死亡率:按社会经济地位的差异分析
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2015 Jun;39(3):243-9. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12305. Epub 2015 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Demographic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Telemedicine Use Among Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基层医疗中2型糖尿病患者使用远程医疗的人口统计学和社会经济差异:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Sep 9;27:e73113. doi: 10.2196/73113.
2
Effect of Socioeconomic Status on Financial Toxicity: The Chain Mediating Roles of Social Support and Self-Efficacy.社会经济地位对经济毒性的影响:社会支持和自我效能感的链式中介作用
Cancer Med. 2025 Aug;14(15):e71083. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71083.
3
Burden of coeliac disease in Germany: real-world insights from a large retrospective health insurance claims database analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Socioeconomic position and health services use in Germany and Spain during the Great Recession.大衰退期间德国和西班牙的社会经济地位与医疗服务利用情况
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 30;12(8):e0183325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183325. eCollection 2017.
2
Income disparities in healthcare use remain after controlling for healthcare need: evidence from Swedish register data on psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.在控制医疗需求后,医疗保健使用方面的收入差距仍然存在:来自瑞典银屑病和银屑病关节炎登记数据的证据。
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Apr;19(3):447-462. doi: 10.1007/s10198-017-0895-5. Epub 2017 May 19.
3
Socioeconomic status in childhood and C reactive protein in adulthood: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
德国乳糜泻负担:来自大型回顾性健康保险理赔数据库分析的真实世界见解
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 4;18:17562848251314803. doi: 10.1177/17562848251314803. eCollection 2025.
4
Sex and gender in rhinosinusitis: a review.鼻窦炎中的性别与性:综述
Future Microbiol. 2025 Feb;20(3):259-264. doi: 10.1080/17460913.2024.2441010. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
5
The association between education level and overactive bladder: Evidence from a U.S. population-based study.教育水平与膀胱过度活动症之间的关联:来自一项基于美国人群研究的证据。
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Oct 10;47:102898. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102898. eCollection 2024 Nov.
6
Impact of sex and socioeconomic status on the likelihood of surgery, hospitalization, and use of medications in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.性别和社会经济地位对炎症性肠病手术、住院和药物使用可能性的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 24;13(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02584-3.
7
An Infrastructure Framework for Remote Patient Monitoring Interventions and Research.远程患者监测干预和研究的基础设施框架。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 30;26:e51234. doi: 10.2196/51234.
8
Mapping Health Disparities:: Leveraging Area-Based Deprivation Indices for Targeted Chronic Disease Intervention.绘制健康差异地图:利用基于区域的贫困指数进行有针对性的慢性病干预。
Dela J Public Health. 2024 Mar 29;10(1):106-110. doi: 10.32481/djph.2024.03.14. eCollection 2024 Mar.
9
Patient Use, Experience, and Satisfaction With Telehealth in an Australian Population (Reimagining Health Care): Web-Based Survey Study.澳大利亚人群中患者对远程医疗的使用、体验和满意度(重新构想医疗保健):基于网络的调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 17;25:e45016. doi: 10.2196/45016.
10
LOFIT (Lifestyle front Office For Integrating lifestyle medicine in the Treatment of patients): a novel care model towards community-based options for lifestyle change-study protocol.LOFIT(生活方式前台办公室,用于将生活方式医学整合到患者治疗中):一种针对基于社区的生活方式改变选择的新型护理模式的研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Feb 17;24(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06960-z.
儿童时期的社会经济地位与成年期 C 反应蛋白的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Aug;71(8):817-826. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-208646. Epub 2017 May 10.
4
Inequities in health care utilization by people aged 50+: evidence from 12 European countries.50岁及以上人群在医疗保健利用方面的不平等:来自12个欧洲国家的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Feb;126:154-63. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.12.028. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
5
Educational attainment and obesity: a systematic review.教育程度与肥胖:一项系统综述。
Obes Rev. 2013 Dec;14(12):989-1005. doi: 10.1111/obr.12062. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
6
The social determinants of health: coming of age.健康的社会决定因素:时代的潮流。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2011;32:381-98. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-101218.
7
Health expenditure estimation and functional form: applications of the generalized gamma and extended estimating equations models.卫生支出估计和函数形式:广义伽马模型和扩展估计方程模型的应用。
Health Econ. 2010 May;19(5):608-27. doi: 10.1002/hec.1498.
8
Social/economic status and disease.社会/经济地位与疾病
Annu Rev Public Health. 1987;8:111-35. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.08.050187.000551.