Shrivastava P N, Saylor T K, Matloubieh A Y, Paliwal B R
Allegheny-Singer Research Institute, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA 15212-9986.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1988 Feb;14(2):327-35. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(88)90440-3.
Results of the evaluation of thermometry devices used during hyperthermia treatments at 14 different clinics in the USA are presented. Measurements were made by the Hyperthermia Physics Center (HPC, a national hyperthermia quality assurance program under NCI contract No. N01-CM-37512) according to a protocol. Our sample included thermocouples, fiberoptic thermometers, and high lead resistance thermistors. We found that only some but not all of the thermometers of each kind performed within the +/- 0.2 degrees C acceptability criteria of accuracy. The precision, stability, and response times achieved with each type of thermometer are presented. A summary of perturbations and artifacts typical for each system is presented together with suggested precautions to avoid them during clinical usage. We conclude that although the technology used with each thermometer system is capable of producing a temperature accuracy of 0.2 degrees C, this accuracy is clinically achievable only with a concerted effort and a constant alertness on the part of the investigator. Based on the combined experience of this survey, the clinical investigators we visited, and published reports, we present certain guidelines and procedures that can help to reduce the inaccuracies and improve the reliability of temperature data obtained in clinical hyperthermia trials.