Phipps Steven J, Grafton R Quentin, Kompas Tom
Ikigai Research, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Nov 18;7(11):200909. doi: 10.1098/rsos.200909. eCollection 2020 Nov.
Differences in COVID-19 testing and tracing across countries, as well as changes in testing within each country over time, make it difficult to estimate the true (population) infection rate based on the confirmed number of cases obtained through RNA viral testing. We applied a backcasting approach to estimate a distribution for the true (population) cumulative number of infections (infected and recovered) for 15 developed countries. Our sample comprised countries with similar levels of medical care and with populations that have similar age distributions. Monte Carlo methods were used to robustly sample parameter uncertainty. We found a strong and statistically significant negative relationship between the proportion of the population who test positive and the implied true detection rate. Despite an overall improvement in detection rates as the pandemic has progressed, our estimates showed that, as at 31 August 2020, the true number of people to have been infected across our sample of 15 countries was 6.2 (95% CI: 4.3-10.9) times greater than the reported number of cases. In individual countries, the true number of cases exceeded the reported figure by factors that range from 2.6 (95% CI: 1.8-4.5) for South Korea to 17.5 (95% CI: 12.2-30.7) for Italy.
各国在新冠病毒检测和追踪方面存在差异,而且每个国家的检测情况随时间也有所变化,这使得基于通过RNA病毒检测获得的确诊病例数来估计真实(总体)感染率变得困难。我们采用了一种回溯法来估计15个发达国家真实(总体)感染(感染和康复)累积数的分布情况。我们的样本包括医疗水平相似且人口年龄分布相似的国家。使用蒙特卡罗方法对参数不确定性进行稳健抽样。我们发现检测呈阳性的人口比例与隐含的真实检测率之间存在强烈且具有统计学意义的负相关关系。尽管随着疫情的发展,检测率总体上有所提高,但我们的估计表明,截至2020年8月31日,我们所选取的15个国家样本中实际感染人数是报告病例数的6.2倍(95%置信区间:4.3 - 10.9)。在个别国家,实际病例数超过报告数字的倍数从韩国的2.6倍(95%置信区间:1.8 - 4.5)到意大利的17.5倍(95%置信区间:12.2 - 30.7)不等。