德克萨斯州在冠状病毒大流行期间颁布行政命令禁止堕胎后堕胎情况的变化。
Changes in Abortion in Texas Following an Executive Order Ban During the Coronavirus Pandemic.
机构信息
Steve Hicks School of Social Work, University of Texas at Austin.
Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, Houston, Texas.
出版信息
JAMA. 2021 Feb 16;325(7):691-693. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.24096.
Abstract
This study assesses changes in abortions performed and at what gestational age following a Texas order postponing non–medically necessary surgeries due to the COVID-19 pandemic compared with abortions performed during the same months in 2019.
摘要
本研究评估了德克萨斯州因 COVID-19 大流行而推迟非医疗必要手术的命令发布后，与 2019 年同期相比，堕胎手术数量和手术进行时的妊娠周数的变化。
相似文献
1
Changes in Abortion in Texas Following an Executive Order Ban During the Coronavirus Pandemic.
JAMA. 2021 Feb 16;325(7):691-693. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.24096.
2
Requests for Abortion Medications for Future Use Surged Post-Dobbs.
JAMA. 2024 Feb 6;331(5):385. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.27438.
3
Texas' 2021 Ban on Abortion in Early Pregnancy and Changes in Live Births.
JAMA. 2023 Jul 18;330(3):281-282. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.12034.
4
Expanding Access to Medication Abortions.
JAMA. 2022 Jan 11;327(2):112-114. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.23357.
5
Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion Provided Using Online Telemedicine in 30 US States Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
JAMA. 2022 Nov 1;328(17):1768-1770. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.18865.
6
Choosing balance: congressional powers and the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.
Fordham Law Rev. 2005 Mar;73(4):1987-2206.
7
Europe finds abortion pill is no magic cure-all.
N Y Times Web. 2000 Oct 5:A3.
8
After decades, Russia narrows grounds for abortions.
N Y Times Web. 2003 Aug 24:A3.
9
30 years after abortion ruling, new trends but the old debate.
N Y Times Web. 2003 Jan 20:A1, A16.
10
Legal termination of pregnancy.
S Afr Med J. 2003 Feb;93(2):87.
引用本文的文献
1
"Distinct and Separate Issues": Examining US Adults' Attitudes Toward Abortion During COVID-19.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Mar;57(1):8-16. doi: 10.1111/psrh.70002. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
2
Fertility in a Pandemic: Evidence from California.
Popul Dev Rev. 2024 Jul;50(Suppl 1):101-128. doi: 10.1111/padr.12591. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
3
Collective Persistence, Care, and Advocacy Amid Repeated Attacks on Reproductive Freedom.
Am J Public Health. 2024 Oct;114(10):1000-1002. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307810. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
4
Abortion assistance fund staff and volunteers as patient navigators following an abortion ban in Texas.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Sep;56(3):235-243. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12240. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
5
Gender as a social and structural variable: research perspectives from the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Jan 11;14(1):13-22. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad014.
6
Out-of-State Travel for Abortion among Texas Residents following an Executive Order Suspending In-State Services during the Coronavirus Pandemic.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 19;20(4):3679. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043679.
7
Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2020.
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2022 Nov 25;71(10):1-27. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7110a1.
8
Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2020.
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2022 Dec;54(4):128-141. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12215. Epub 2022 Nov 20.
9
Access to Abortion After Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization: Advocacy and a Call to Action for the Profession of Psychiatry.
Acad Psychiatry. 2023 Feb;47(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s40596-022-01729-7.
10
Association of Texas' 2021 Ban on Abortion in Early Pregnancy With the Number of Facility-Based Abortions in Texas and Surrounding States.
JAMA. 2022 Nov 22;328(20):2048-2055. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.20423.
Zotero 插件