Goisis Alice, Palma Maria
Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Social Research Institute, UCL, London, UK.
Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
Hum Reprod. 2021 Feb 18;36(3):702-711. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa350.
Do the parent-child relationships of adolescents born after medically assisted reproduction (MAR) using the parents' own gametes differ from those of adolescents born after natural conception (NC)?
MAR and NC families have similar parent-child relationships in terms of closeness and conflict frequency, except that MAR mothers report being closer to their children than NC mothers.
Prior work on parent-child relationships during childhood has reported mixed findings. While some studies have documented no differences between MAR and NC families, others have shown that MAR families have greater levels of warmth and positive feelings than NC families. Evidence on parent-child relationships during the adolescent period is generally positive but is limited because of the small number of existing studies and the reliance on small samples.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This work is based on the UK Millennium Cohort Study, whose study members were born in 2000-2002. The analyses focused on Sweep 6 which was collected when cohort members were around 14 years old. We also relied on variables collected in Sweep 1, when cohort members were aged around 9 months, to account for characteristics that could confound or mediate the relationship between MAR and our outcomes. The attrition rate between Sweeps 1 and 6 was 36.7%.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The final sample consisted of 10 233 cohort members, 320 of whom were conceived with the help of MAR (3.1%). A total of six dependent variables were used to measure, when the cohort members were around 14 years old, levels of parent-child closeness and conflict, reported separately by the mother, the father and the cohort member. Linear models were used to analyse the association between parent-child relationships before and after adjustment for socio-demographic characteristics and mental health.
Sweep 6 achieved a response rate of 76.3% of the eligible sample. The results show that, on average, MAR and NC families had similar parent-child relationships in terms of closeness and conflict frequency. The only difference was that MAR mothers reported being closer to their children than NC mothers both before (β = 0.149, P < 0.05) and after (β = 0.102, P < 0.1) adjustment for family socio-demographic characteristics and mental health.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The outcome variables are self-reported by each of the respondents and could be subject to social desirability bias. Second, some parents may have not reported they conceived through donor insemination, which could result in the analytical sample including a small subset of children who were not genetically related to their parents. Third, the data did not include information about whether the children were aware of their conception mode, since the Millennium Cohort Study did not collect information on MAR disclosure. Moreover, they did not allow us to study other aspects of parent-child relationships. Finally, as we observed parent-child relationships at only one moment in time; we were unable to test whether they changed over time.
The results suggest that the difficulties and the stress parents underwent to conceive through MAR did not translate into more difficult parent-child relationships during adolescence. Given the increasing number of children conceived via MAR, the finding that MAR and NC families had similar parent-child relationships in terms of closeness and conflict frequency is reassuring.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by European Research Council agreement n. 803959 (MARTE to A.G.). The authors declare no competing interests.
n/a.
使用父母自身配子通过医学辅助生殖(MAR)出生的青少年的亲子关系,与自然受孕(NC)出生的青少年的亲子关系是否存在差异?
在亲密程度和冲突频率方面,医学辅助生殖家庭和自然受孕家庭的亲子关系相似,只是医学辅助生殖家庭的母亲报告称与孩子的关系比自然受孕家庭的母亲更亲密。
先前关于儿童期亲子关系的研究结果不一。虽然一些研究表明医学辅助生殖家庭和自然受孕家庭之间没有差异,但其他研究显示医学辅助生殖家庭比自然受孕家庭有更高水平的温暖和积极情感。关于青少年期亲子关系的证据总体上是积极的,但由于现有研究数量少且样本量小,证据有限。
研究设计、规模、持续时间:这项研究基于英国千禧队列研究,其研究对象出生于2000年至2002年。分析集中在第6轮调查,该轮调查是在队列成员约14岁时收集的。我们还依赖第1轮调查收集的变量,当时队列成员约9个月大,以考虑可能混淆或调节医学辅助生殖与我们的研究结果之间关系的特征。第1轮和第6轮调查之间的损耗率为36.7%。
参与者/材料、设置、方法:最终样本包括10233名队列成员,其中320名是通过医学辅助生殖受孕的(3.1%)。总共使用了六个因变量来衡量队列成员约14岁时母亲(父亲和队列成员分别报告)的亲子亲密程度和冲突水平。线性模型用于分析在调整社会人口学特征和心理健康前后亲子关系之间的关联。
第6轮调查的合格样本回复率为76.3%。结果表明,平均而言,在亲密程度和冲突频率方面,医学辅助生殖家庭和自然受孕家庭的亲子关系相似。唯一的差异是,在调整家庭社会人口学特征和心理健康之前(β = 0.149,P < 0.05)和之后(β = 0.102,P < 0.1),医学辅助生殖家庭的母亲报告称与孩子的关系比自然受孕家庭的母亲更亲密。
局限性、谨慎原因:结果变量由每位受访者自我报告,可能存在社会期望偏差。其次,一些父母可能未报告他们是通过供体授精受孕的,这可能导致分析样本中包括一小部分与父母无基因关系的孩子。第三,数据未包括孩子是否知晓其受孕方式的信息,因为千禧队列研究未收集关于医学辅助生殖披露的信息。此外,这些数据不允许我们研究亲子关系的其他方面。最后,由于我们仅在一个时间点观察亲子关系,我们无法测试它们是否随时间变化。
结果表明,父母通过医学辅助生殖受孕所经历的困难和压力,在青少年期并未转化为更困难的亲子关系。鉴于通过医学辅助生殖受孕的儿童数量不断增加,医学辅助生殖家庭和自然受孕家庭在亲密程度和冲突频率方面的亲子关系相似这一发现令人安心。
研究资金/利益冲突:这项工作得到了欧洲研究理事会协议编号803959(给A.G.的MARTE)的支持。作者声明无利益冲突。
无。