Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC, USA.
Department of Public Health, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC, USA.
Cancer Causes Control. 2021 Mar;32(3):271-278. doi: 10.1007/s10552-020-01381-2. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
Despite improvements in colorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes, geographic disparities persist. Spatial mapping identified distinct "hotspots" of increased CRC mortality, including 11 rural counties in eastern North Carolina (ENC). The primary aims of this study were to measure CRC incidence and mortality by stage and determine if racial disparities exist within ENC.
Data from 2008 to 2016 from the NC Central Cancer Registry were analyzed by stage, race, and region. Age-adjusted incidence and death rates (95% CI) were expressed per 100,000 persons within hotspot counties, all ENC counties, and Non-ENC counties.
CRC incidence [43.7 (95% CI 39.2-48.8) vs. 38.4 (95% CI 37.6-39.2)] and mortality rates [16.1 (95% CI 16.6-19.7) vs. 13.9 (95% CI 13.7-14.2)] were higher in the hotspot than non-ENC, respectively. Overall, localized, and regional CRC incidence rates were highest among African Americans (AA) residing in the hotspot compared to Whites or Non-ENC residents. Incidence rates of distant disease were higher among AA but did not differ by region. CRC mortality rates were highest among AA in the hotspot (AA 22.0 vs. Whites 15.8) compared to Non-ENC (AA 19.3 vs. Whites 13.0), although significant stage-stratified mortality differences were not observed.
Patients residing in the hotspot counties have higher age-adjusted incidence of overall, localized, regional, and distant CRC and mortality rates than patients in non-hotspot counties. Incidence and mortality rates remain highest among AA residing in the hotspot.
Increased CRC incidence and mortality rates were observed among all patients in the hotspot and were highest among AA, suggestive of ongoing racial and geographic disparities.
尽管结直肠癌(CRC)的治疗效果有所改善,但仍存在地域差异。空间映射确定了 CRC 死亡率增加的明显“热点”,包括北卡罗来纳州东部的 11 个农村县(ENC)。本研究的主要目的是按阶段衡量 CRC 的发病率和死亡率,并确定 ENC 内是否存在种族差异。
分析了 2008 年至 2016 年来自北卡罗来纳州中部癌症登记处的数据,按阶段、种族和区域进行分析。用每 10 万人中的发病率和死亡率(95%置信区间)来表示热点县、ENC 县和非 ENC 县的发病率和死亡率。
CRC 的发病率[43.7(95%CI 39.2-48.8)比 38.4(95%CI 37.6-39.2)]和死亡率[16.1(95%CI 16.6-19.7)比 13.9(95%CI 13.7-14.2)]在热点地区都高于非 ENC。总的来说,与白人或非 ENC 居民相比,居住在热点地区的非裔美国人(AA)的局部和区域 CRC 发病率最高。然而,AA 的远处疾病发病率较高,但与区域无关。CRC 死亡率在热点地区的 AA 中最高(AA 22.0 比白人 15.8),高于非 ENC(AA 19.3 比白人 13.0),尽管没有观察到显著的分层死亡率差异。
与非热点县的患者相比,居住在热点县的患者的总体、局部、区域和远处 CRC 的年龄调整发病率和死亡率更高。居住在热点地区的 AA 的发病率和死亡率仍然最高。
热点地区的所有患者的 CRC 发病率和死亡率均有所增加,而 AA 的发病率和死亡率最高,表明仍存在种族和地域差异。