Suppr超能文献

在癌症预防研究 II 中,通过筛查女性的检测方式来确定乳腺癌的风险因素。

Breast cancer risk factors by mode of detection among screened women in the Cancer Prevention Study-II.

机构信息

Behavioral and Epidemiology Research Program, American Cancer Society, 250 Williams Street, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA.

Departments of Epidemiology and of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinical College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Apr;186(3):791-805. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-06025-2. Epub 2021 Jan 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Identifying risk factors for women at high risk of symptom-detected breast cancers that were missed by screening would enable targeting of enhanced screening regimens. To this end, we examined associations of breast cancer risk factors by mode of detection in screened women from the Cancer Prevention Study (CPS)-II Nutrition Cohort.

METHODS

Among 77,206 women followed for a median of 14.8 years, 2711 screen-detected and 1281 symptom-detected breast cancer cases were diagnosed. Multivariable-adjusted associations were estimated using joint Cox proportional hazards regression models with person-time calculated contingent on screening.

RESULTS

Factors associated with higher risks of symptom-detected and screen-detected breast cancer included current combined hormone therapy (HT) use (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.72-2.48 and 1.45, 1.27-1.65, respectively) and history of benign breast disease (1.85, 1.64-2.08 and 1.43, 1.31-1.55, respectively). Current estrogen-only HT use was associated with symptom-detected (1.40, 1.15-1.71) but not screen-detected (0.95, 0.83-1.09) breast cancer. Higher risk of screen-detected but not symptom-detected breast cancer was observed for obese vs. normal body mass index (1.22, 1.01-1.48 and 0.76, 0.56-1.01, respectively), per 3 h/day sitting time (1.10, 1.04-1.16 and 0.97, 0.89-1.06, respectively), and ≥ 2 drinks per day vs. nondrinker (1.40, 1.16-1.69 and 1.27, 0.97-1.66, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in risk factors for symptom-detected vs. screen-detected breast cancer were observed and most notably, use of combined and estrogen-only HT and a history of benign breast disease were associated with increased risk of symptomatic detected breast cancer.

IMPACT

If confirmed, these data suggest that such women may benefit from more intensive screening to facilitate early detection.

摘要

背景

识别出因筛查而漏诊的有症状乳腺癌高危女性的风险因素,有助于针对这些女性实施强化筛查方案。为此,我们研究了在癌症预防研究(CPS-II 营养队列)中,通过筛查发现的女性中,乳腺癌风险因素与检出模式之间的关联。

方法

在中位随访时间为 14.8 年的 77206 名女性中,诊断出 2711 例筛查发现的乳腺癌和 1281 例有症状发现的乳腺癌。使用联合 Cox 比例风险回归模型,根据筛查情况计算人时,对多变量调整后的关联进行估计。

结果

与症状性和筛查性乳腺癌风险增加相关的因素包括正在使用联合激素治疗(HR 2.07,95%CI 1.72-2.48 和 1.45,1.27-1.65)和有良性乳腺疾病史(1.85,1.64-2.08 和 1.43,1.31-1.55)。正在使用雌激素单独激素治疗与症状性(1.40,1.15-1.71)而非筛查性(0.95,0.83-1.09)乳腺癌相关。与正常体重指数相比,肥胖与筛查性但非症状性乳腺癌风险增加相关(1.22,1.01-1.48 和 0.76,0.56-1.01),每天坐着 3 小时或更长时间(1.10,1.04-1.16 和 0.97,0.89-1.06),以及每天饮用≥2 份与不饮酒者相比(1.40,1.16-1.69 和 1.27,0.97-1.66)。

结论

我们观察到有症状与筛查性乳腺癌之间的风险因素存在差异,值得注意的是,联合和雌激素单独激素治疗的使用以及良性乳腺疾病史与症状性乳腺癌的风险增加相关。

影响

如果这些数据得到证实,那么这些女性可能受益于更密集的筛查,以促进早期发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验