Garcia-Closas Montserrat, Berrington de Gonzalez Amy
Am J Epidemiol. 2015 Sep 1;182(5):390-3. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv086. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
The role of lifestyle risk factors in prostate cancer risk remains elusive despite a large number of epidemiologic studies. In a pooled analysis of data from South and East Asian countries published in this issue, Fowke et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2015;182(5):381-389) found no evidence for an association between prostate cancer mortality and obesity, alcohol, or smoking. Prostate cancer screening is very uncommon in these countries, and previous evidence for associations with lifestyle factors comes primarily from studies carried out in North America, where screening is very common. Fowke et al. concluded that screening biases are likely to explain the differences in study results. In this commentary, we discuss the potential influence of population-based cancer screening programs in estimates of association from epidemiologic studies. This highlights the importance of carefully considering the impact of screening in the analysis and interpretation of results, in order to advance our understanding of the etiology of cancers that can be detected by screening.
尽管进行了大量的流行病学研究,但生活方式风险因素在前列腺癌风险中的作用仍不明确。在本期发表的一项对南亚和东亚国家数据的汇总分析中,福克等人(《美国流行病学杂志》。2015年;182(5):381 - 389)未发现前列腺癌死亡率与肥胖、饮酒或吸烟之间存在关联的证据。前列腺癌筛查在这些国家非常罕见,而此前关于与生活方式因素关联的证据主要来自北美进行的研究,在北美筛查非常普遍。福克等人得出结论,筛查偏差可能解释了研究结果的差异。在这篇评论中,我们讨论了基于人群的癌症筛查项目在流行病学研究关联估计中的潜在影响。这凸显了在分析和解释结果时仔细考虑筛查影响的重要性,以便增进我们对可通过筛查检测出的癌症病因的理解。