• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同的抑制控制成分可以预测双语者不同水平的语言控制。

Different inhibitory control components predict different levels of language control in bilinguals.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning & IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 10085, People's Republic of China.

School of Psychology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, 200438, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2021 May;49(4):758-770. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01131-4. Epub 2021 Jan 4.

DOI:10.3758/s13421-020-01131-4
PMID:33398787
Abstract

In recent years, some studies have started to explore the impact of individual general executive functions (EFs) on bilingual language control. To our knowledge, few studies have systematically examined various components of EFs on different levels of language control in bilinguals. In two experiments, we investigated the effects of two components of IC on different levels of bilingual language control. The language-switching task was used to tap into language control at different levels. The Simon task was used to measure interference suppression in Experiment 1, and a go/no-go task was used to measure response inhibition in Experiment 2. Experiment 1 found that the smaller the Simon effect was, the larger the asymmetry of switch costs was. Experiment 2 found that the shorter the go response time was, the larger the global slowing effect was. Taken together, these findings suggest that the interference suppression component of domain-general IC facilitates local level language control, while response inhibition impacts global level language control in bilinguals.

摘要

近年来,一些研究开始探索个体一般执行功能(EFs)对双语语言控制的影响。据我们所知,很少有研究系统地考察了双语者在不同语言控制水平上的 EFs 的各种成分。在两项实验中,我们研究了 IC 的两个成分对双语语言控制不同水平的影响。语言转换任务用于挖掘不同水平的语言控制。Simon 任务用于在实验 1 中测量干扰抑制,而 go/no-go 任务用于在实验 2 中测量反应抑制。实验 1 发现 Simon 效应越小,转换代价的不对称性越大。实验 2 发现 go 反应时间越短,全局减速效应越大。总之,这些发现表明,领域一般性 IC 的干扰抑制成分有助于本地水平的语言控制,而反应抑制则影响双语者的全局水平语言控制。

相似文献

1
Different inhibitory control components predict different levels of language control in bilinguals.不同的抑制控制成分可以预测双语者不同水平的语言控制。
Mem Cognit. 2021 May;49(4):758-770. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01131-4. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
2
Age-related effect on language control and executive control in bilingual and monolingual speakers: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.年龄对双语和单语使用者语言控制和执行控制的影响:行为和电生理证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Feb 17;138:107336. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107336. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
3
Inhibition Efficiency in Highly Proficient Bilinguals and Simultaneous Interpreters: Evidence from Language Switching and Stroop Tasks.高熟练度双语者和同声传译员的抑制效率:来自语言切换和斯特鲁普任务的证据。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2017 Dec;46(6):1427-1451. doi: 10.1007/s10936-017-9501-3.
4
Inhibitory control training reveals a common neurofunctional basis for generic executive functions and language switching in bilinguals.抑制控制训练揭示了双语者通用执行功能和语言转换的共同神经功能基础。
BMC Neurosci. 2021 May 17;22(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12868-021-00640-5.
5
Electrophysiological evidence for domain-general inhibitory control during bilingual language switching.双语语言切换过程中领域通用抑制控制的电生理证据。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 24;9(10):e110887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110887. eCollection 2014.
6
Cognitive control in bilinguals: Proficiency and code-switching both matter.双语者的认知控制:熟练程度和语码转换都很重要。
Cognition. 2021 Apr;209:104575. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104575. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
7
Effect of language proficiency on proactive occulo-motor control among bilinguals.双语者语言熟练度对主动眼球运动控制的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 12;13(12):e0207904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207904. eCollection 2018.
8
The effect of domain-general inhibition-related training on language switching: An ERP study.领域一般性抑制相关训练对语言转换的影响:一项事件相关电位研究。
Cognition. 2016 Jan;146:264-76. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
9
Language context modulates executive control in bilinguals: Evidence from language production.语言语境调节双语者的执行控制:来自语言产生的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 May;142:107441. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107441. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
10
Specific language impairment in language-minority children from low-income families.低收入家庭中语言少数群体儿童的特定语言障碍。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014 Nov;49(6):736-47. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12107. Epub 2014 Sep 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effects of Cognitive Control on the Subcomponents of Language Control in Spoken and Written Productions.认知控制对口语和书面表达中语言控制子成分的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Sep 29;13(10):809. doi: 10.3390/bs13100809.
2
When interlocutor's face-language matching alters: An ERP study on face contexts and bilingual language control in mixed-language picture naming.当对话者的面部语言匹配发生变化时:一项关于混合语言图片命名中面部情境和双语语言控制的ERP研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 23;14:1134635. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1134635. eCollection 2023.
3
Second Language Proficiency Modulates the Dependency of Bilingual Language Control on Domain-General Cognitive Control.

本文引用的文献

1
Which bilinguals reverse language dominance and why?哪些双语者会逆转语言优势,原因是什么?
Cognition. 2020 Nov;204:104384. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104384. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
2
No evidence for a bilingual executive function advantage in the nationally representative ABCD study.在具有全国代表性的 ABCD 研究中,没有双语执行功能优势的证据。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Jul;3(7):692-701. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0609-3. Epub 2019 May 20.
3
Statistical power in two-level models: A tutorial based on Monte Carlo simulation.两层模型中的统计功效:基于蒙特卡罗模拟的教程。
第二语言熟练度调节双语语言控制对领域通用认知控制的依赖性。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 10;13:810573. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.810573. eCollection 2022.
4
Older bilinguals reverse language dominance less than younger bilinguals: Evidence for the inhibitory deficit hypothesis.老年人双语者比年轻人双语者更难逆转语言优势:抑制缺陷假说的证据。
Psychol Aging. 2021 Nov;36(7):806-821. doi: 10.1037/pag0000618. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
Psychol Methods. 2019 Feb;24(1):1-19. doi: 10.1037/met0000195. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
4
Inhibition accumulates over time at multiple processing levels in bilingual language control.双语语言控制在多个加工水平上随时间的推移而积累抑制。
Cognition. 2018 Apr;173:115-132. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.01.009.
5
Neural correlates for naming disadvantage of the dominant language in bilingual word production.双语词汇产出中优势语言命名劣势的神经关联
Brain Lang. 2017 Dec;175:123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
6
The effect of domain-general inhibition-related training on language switching: An ERP study.领域一般性抑制相关训练对语言转换的影响:一项事件相关电位研究。
Cognition. 2016 Jan;146:264-76. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
7
Rapid Automatized Naming in Children with Dyslexia: Is Inhibitory Control Involved?阅读障碍儿童的快速自动命名:是否涉及抑制控制?
Dyslexia. 2015 Aug;21(3):212-34. doi: 10.1002/dys.1487. Epub 2014 Dec 20.
8
Early stage second-language learning improves executive control: evidence from ERP.早期第二语言学习可改善执行控制:来自事件相关电位的证据。
Brain Lang. 2014 Dec;139:84-98. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
9
Brain network activity in monolingual and bilingual older adults.单语和双语老年人的脑网络活动。
Neuropsychologia. 2015 Jan;66:170-81. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.042. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
10
Electrophysiological evidence for domain-general inhibitory control during bilingual language switching.双语语言切换过程中领域通用抑制控制的电生理证据。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 24;9(10):e110887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110887. eCollection 2014.