Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, UC San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Department of Mathematics, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
Stat Med. 2021 Mar 30;40(7):1705-1717. doi: 10.1002/sim.8865. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
Statistical methods for analysis of survey data have been developed to facilitate research. More recently, Lumley and Scott (2013) developed an approach to extend the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon (MWW) rank sum test to survey data. Their approach focuses on the null of equal distribution. In many studies, the MWW test is called for when two-sample t-tests (with or without equal variance assumed) fail to provide meaningful results, as they are highly sensitive to outliers. In such situations, the null of equal distribution is too restrictive, as interest lies in comparing centers of groups. In this article, we develop an approach to extend the MWW test to survey data to test the null of equal mean rank. Although not as popular as the mean and median, the mean rank is also a meaningful measure of the center of a distribution and is the same as the median for a symmetric distribution. We illustrate the proposed approach and show major differences with Lumley and Scott's alternative using both real and simulated data.
统计方法已被开发用于分析调查数据,以促进研究。最近,Lumley 和 Scott(2013)开发了一种方法,将曼-惠特尼-威尔科克森(MWW)秩和检验扩展到调查数据。他们的方法侧重于均等分布的零假设。在许多研究中,当两样本 t 检验(无论是否假设等方差)无法提供有意义的结果时,就需要使用 MWW 检验,因为它们对异常值非常敏感。在这种情况下,均等分布的零假设过于严格,因为人们的兴趣在于比较组的中心。在本文中,我们开发了一种将 MWW 检验扩展到调查数据以检验均等均值秩零假设的方法。虽然均值和中位数不如均值和中位数受欢迎,但均值秩也是分布中心的一个有意义的度量,对于对称分布,它与中位数相同。我们用真实数据和模拟数据说明了所提出的方法,并展示了与 Lumley 和 Scott 的替代方法的主要差异。