Kärna Primary Healthcare Centre, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Eur J Gen Pract. 2020 Dec;26(1):210-216. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2020.1852547.
In primary care, the diagnosis of pneumonia is often based on history and clinical examination alone. However, a previous study showed that the general practitioner's degree of suspicion correlates well with findings on chest X-ray, when the C-reactive protein (CRP) value is known.
The present study aimed to investigate to what extent the physician's degree of suspicion is affected by the CRP level when community-acquired pneumonia is suspected in primary care.
A prospective observational study was conducted at five primary health care centres in Sweden between October 2015 and December 2017. Adult patients ( = 266) consulting their health care centre with symptoms of lower respiratory tract infection, where the physician suspected pneumonia, were included consecutively. Anamnestic information and findings from clinical examination were documented in a case report form. All patients were tested for CRP. The physicians rated their degree of suspicion as 'unsure,' 'quite sure,' and 'sure' before and after the CRP result.
The degree of suspicion of pneumonia changed in 69% of the cases; most often to a lower degree (40%). In 28% of the cases, there was no longer any suspicion of pneumonia after CRP.
Our results indicate that CRP testing highly influences the physician's degree of suspicion of pneumonia in primary care and that it seems to be of most value when not sure of the diagnosis.
在初级保健中,肺炎的诊断通常仅基于病史和临床检查。然而,先前的一项研究表明,当已知 C 反应蛋白 (CRP) 值时,全科医生的怀疑程度与胸部 X 光检查结果密切相关。
本研究旨在调查当怀疑社区获得性肺炎时,CRP 水平对医生怀疑程度的影响程度。
在 2015 年 10 月至 2017 年 12 月期间,在瑞典的五家初级保健中心进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。连续纳入因下呼吸道感染症状就诊于其保健中心且医生怀疑患有肺炎的成年患者(n = 266)。在病历报告表中记录了病史信息和临床检查结果。所有患者均接受 CRP 检测。医生在 CRP 结果之前和之后将其怀疑肺炎的程度评为“不确定”、“相当确定”和“确定”。
69%的病例中肺炎的怀疑程度发生了变化;最常见的是程度降低(40%)。在 28%的病例中,CRP 检测后不再怀疑患有肺炎。
我们的结果表明,CRP 检测高度影响了初级保健中医生对肺炎的怀疑程度,并且在不确定诊断时似乎最有价值。