• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

做最坏的打算:在任何即将到来的情绪性或中性刺激之前,注意力都会增强。

Preparing for the Worst: Attention is Enhanced Prior to Any Upcoming Emotional or Neutral Stimulus.

作者信息

Makovski Tal, Chajut Eran

机构信息

Department of Education and Psychology, The Open University of Israel.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2021 Feb;32(2):256-266. doi: 10.1177/0956797620963612. Epub 2021 Jan 5.

DOI:10.1177/0956797620963612
PMID:33400635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7882998/
Abstract

Do people allocate more or fewer attentional resources when preparing for negative emotional visual stimuli to appear? In three experiments (total = 150), participants performed a change-detection task while expecting a neutral, threatening, disgusting, or joyful stimulus or no stimulus to appear at a fixed moment. Responses to an infrequent dot probe were faster when participants were expecting a distracting stimulus. Importantly, although only negative stimuli impaired change-detection performance, there was no difference between the preparation effect for threatening and neutral stimuli (Experiment 1) or disgusting and joyful stimuli (Experiment 3). The preparation effects were also unaffected by the participant's anxiety level. Experiment 2 confirmed that the threatening images affected performance when the dot probe appeared after the image. These results suggest that the visual system increases alertness in response to any upcoming stimulus and further imply that the effects of emotional stimuli largely occur after, but not before, the stimuli appear.

摘要

当准备负面情绪视觉刺激出现时,人们分配的注意力资源会更多还是更少?在三项实验(共150名参与者)中,参与者在期待中性、威胁性、恶心或愉悦刺激或无刺激在固定时刻出现的同时执行变化检测任务。当参与者期待一个分散注意力的刺激时,对偶尔出现的点探测的反应会更快。重要的是,虽然只有负面刺激会损害变化检测性能,但对威胁性和中性刺激的准备效果(实验1)或恶心和愉悦刺激的准备效果(实验3)之间没有差异。准备效果也不受参与者焦虑水平的影响。实验2证实,当点探测在图像之后出现时,威胁性图像会影响性能。这些结果表明,视觉系统会对任何即将出现的刺激提高警觉性,并且进一步暗示情绪刺激的影响主要发生在刺激出现之后,而不是之前。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13a6/7882998/e030aeeb8743/10.1177_0956797620963612-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13a6/7882998/4fe8588c63ee/10.1177_0956797620963612-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13a6/7882998/5e381698f16f/10.1177_0956797620963612-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13a6/7882998/5510808b7f5f/10.1177_0956797620963612-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13a6/7882998/540e3e3fb58f/10.1177_0956797620963612-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13a6/7882998/e030aeeb8743/10.1177_0956797620963612-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13a6/7882998/4fe8588c63ee/10.1177_0956797620963612-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13a6/7882998/5e381698f16f/10.1177_0956797620963612-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13a6/7882998/5510808b7f5f/10.1177_0956797620963612-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13a6/7882998/540e3e3fb58f/10.1177_0956797620963612-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13a6/7882998/e030aeeb8743/10.1177_0956797620963612-fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Preparing for the Worst: Attention is Enhanced Prior to Any Upcoming Emotional or Neutral Stimulus.做最坏的打算:在任何即将到来的情绪性或中性刺激之前,注意力都会增强。
Psychol Sci. 2021 Feb;32(2):256-266. doi: 10.1177/0956797620963612. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
2
Preparing for distraction: Attention is enhanced prior to the presentation of distractors.准备分心:在呈现分心物之前,注意力会增强。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Feb;148(2):221-236. doi: 10.1037/xge0000509. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
3
Visual images of disgusting creatures facilitated attentional orienting and delayed attentional disengagement.视觉图像的恶心生物促进了注意定向和延迟注意脱离。
Cogn Process. 2024 Feb;25(1):53-60. doi: 10.1007/s10339-023-01162-0. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
4
On the role of goal relevance in emotional attention: disgust evokes early attention to cleanliness.论目标相关性在情绪注意中的作用:厌恶引发对清洁的早期注意。
Cogn Emot. 2011 Apr;25(3):466-77. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.532613.
5
Individual differences in processing emotional images after reading disgusting and neutral sentences.阅读恶心和中性句子后处理情绪图像的个体差异。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Aug;145:106580. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.11.024. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
6
It occurs after all: Attentional bias towards happy faces in the dot-probe task.毕竟它还是出现了:点探测任务中对笑脸的注意偏向。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jul;82(5):2463-2481. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02017-y.
7
Attentional bias for emotional faces in generalized anxiety disorder.广泛性焦虑障碍中对情绪面孔的注意偏向。
Br J Clin Psychol. 1999 Sep;38(3):267-78. doi: 10.1348/014466599162845.
8
Attentional biases and memory for emotional stimuli in men and male rhesus monkeys.男性和雄性恒河猴对情绪刺激的注意偏向与记忆
Anim Cogn. 2013 Nov;16(6):861-71. doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0618-y. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
9
Rapid attentional biases to threat-associated visual features: The roles of anxiety and visual working memory access.快速注意偏向于与威胁相关的视觉特征:焦虑和视觉工作记忆访问的作用。
Emotion. 2022 Apr;22(3):545-553. doi: 10.1037/emo0000761. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
10
Measuring Biases of Visual Attention: A Comparison of Four Tasks.测量视觉注意力偏差:四项任务的比较
Behav Sci (Basel). 2020 Jan 6;10(1):28. doi: 10.3390/bs10010028.

引用本文的文献

1
Expectations don't protect us from emotional distractions.期望并不能使我们免受情绪干扰。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 May 23. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03085-8.
2
The consequences of preparing for informative or distracting stimuli.为信息性或干扰性刺激做准备的后果。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 19;15(1):17402. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02476-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Distractor ignoring: strategies, learning, and passive filtering.干扰项忽略:策略、学习与被动过滤
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2019 Dec 1;28(6):600-606. doi: 10.1177/0963721419867099. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
2
How does a threatening stimulus affect the memory of the display?威胁性刺激是如何影响对展示内容的记忆的?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 May;73(5):676-687. doi: 10.1177/1747021820905735. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
3
Proactive control of affective distraction: Experience-based but not expectancy-based.积极控制情感分心:基于经验而非预期。
Cognition. 2020 Jan;194:104072. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104072. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
4
Oscillatory Mechanisms of Preparing for Visual Distraction.准备视觉分心的波动机制。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Dec;31(12):1873-1894. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01460. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
5
Anticipatory Distractor Suppression Elicited by Statistical Regularities in Visual Search.视觉搜索中统计规律诱发的预期分心物抑制。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Oct;31(10):1535-1548. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01433. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
6
Reward elicits cognitive control over emotional distraction: Evidence from pupillometry.奖励引发对情绪分心的认知控制:瞳孔测量的证据。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Jun;19(3):537-554. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-00669-w.
7
Preparing for distraction: Attention is enhanced prior to the presentation of distractors.准备分心:在呈现分心物之前,注意力会增强。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Feb;148(2):221-236. doi: 10.1037/xge0000509. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
8
Cognitive mechanisms of disgust in the development and maintenance of psychopathology: A qualitative review and synthesis.厌恶情绪在精神病理学发展和维持中的认知机制:定性综述与综合。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 Apr;69:30-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
9
Manipulations of distractor frequency do not mitigate emotion-induced blindness.干扰频率的操作并不能减轻情绪诱导的盲视。
Cogn Emot. 2019 May;33(3):442-451. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1459490. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
10
The Role of Inhibition in Avoiding Distraction by Salient Stimuli.抑制作用在避免被显著刺激物分散注意力中的作用。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Jan;22(1):79-92. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 27.