Departments of Health Promotion and Human Behavior and Clinical Epidemiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine / School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
Departments of Health Promotion and Human Behavior and Clinical Epidemiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine / School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan.
Evid Based Ment Health. 2021 May;24(2):70-76. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2020-300217. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
There are many different skill components used in cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). However, there is currently no comprehensive way of measuring these skills in patients.
To develop a comprehensive and brief measure of five main CBT skills: self-monitoring, behavioural activation, cognitive restructuring, assertiveness training and problem-solving.
University students (N=847) who participated in a fully factorial randomised controlled trial of smartphone CBT were assessed with the CBT Skills Scale, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and the short form of the Japanese Big Five Scale. Structural validity was estimated with exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and internal consistency evaluated with Cronbach's α coefficients. Construct validity was evaluated with the correlations between each factor of the CBT Skills Scale, the PHQ-9, the GAD-7 and the Big Five Scale.
The EFA supported a five-factor solution based on the original instruments assessing each CBT skill component. The CFA showed sufficient goodness-of-fit indices for the five-factor structure. The Cronbach's α of each factor was 0.75-0.81. Each CBT skills factor was specifically correlated to the PHQ-9, GAD-7, and the Big Five Scale.
The CBT Skills Scale has a stable structural validity and internal consistency with a five-factor solution and appropriate content validity concerning the relationship with depression, anxiety and personality.
The CBT Skills Scale will be potential predictor and effect modifier in studying the optimisation of CBT interventions.
CTR-000031307.
认知行为疗法(CBT)中运用了许多不同的技能组成部分。然而,目前还没有一种全面的方法来衡量患者的这些技能。
开发一种全面而简洁的测量五种主要 CBT 技能的方法:自我监测、行为激活、认知重构、自信训练和解决问题。
参与智能手机 CBT 完全因子随机对照试验的大学生(N=847)接受了 CBT 技能量表、患者健康问卷-9(PHQ-9)、广泛性焦虑障碍-7(GAD-7)和日本大五人格量表的简短形式评估。结构效度采用探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA)进行评估,内部一致性用 Cronbach's α 系数进行评估。构念效度通过 CBT 技能量表的每个因素、PHQ-9、GAD-7 和大五人格量表之间的相关性进行评估。
EFA 支持基于评估每个 CBT 技能组成部分的原始工具的五因素解决方案。CFA 显示五因素结构具有足够的良好拟合指数。每个因素的 Cronbach's α 为 0.75-0.81。每个 CBT 技能因素与 PHQ-9、GAD-7 和大五人格量表都有特定的相关性。
CBT 技能量表具有稳定的结构效度和内部一致性,采用五因素结构,与抑郁、焦虑和人格的关系具有适当的内容效度。
CBT 技能量表将成为研究 CBT 干预优化的潜在预测指标和效应修饰因子。
CTR-000031307。