• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
PEMCRC anaphylaxis study protocol: a multicentre cohort study to derive and validate clinical decision models for the emergency department management of children with anaphylaxis.PEMCRC 过敏反应研究方案:一项多中心队列研究,旨在为急诊科管理过敏反应儿童开发和验证临床决策模型。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 5;11(1):e037341. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037341.
2
Canadian Anaphylaxis Network-Predicting Recurrence after Emergency Presentation for Allergic REaction (CAN-PREPARE): a prospective, cohort study protocol.加拿大过敏反应网络-预测急诊过敏反应后复发(CAN-PREPARE):一项前瞻性队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 31;12(10):e061976. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061976.
3
Epidemiology and clinical predictors of biphasic reactions in children with anaphylaxis.过敏反应儿童双相反应的流行病学及临床预测因素
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015 Sep;115(3):217-223.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2015.05.013. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
4
Evaluating Practice Patterns of Observation Periods Following Epinephrine Administration for Anaphylaxis Among Pediatric Patients.评估儿科患者过敏性反应肾上腺素给药后观察期的实践模式。
Cureus. 2024 Sep 14;16(9):e69419. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69419. eCollection 2024 Sep.
5
A multifaceted intervention for patients with anaphylaxis increases epinephrine use in adult emergency department.针对过敏反应患者的多方面干预措施增加了成人急诊科肾上腺素的使用量。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2014 May-Jun;2(3):294-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2013.11.009. Epub 2014 Feb 16.
6
Biphasic Reactions in Emergency Department Anaphylaxis Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.急诊科过敏反应患者的双相反应:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Apr;8(4):1230-1238. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.10.027. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
7
Further Evaluation of Factors That May Predict Biphasic Reactions in Emergency Department Anaphylaxis Patients.进一步评估可能预测急诊科过敏反应患者双相反应的因素。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Sep-Oct;5(5):1295-1301. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.07.020.
8
Improving anaphylaxis management in a pediatric emergency department.改善儿科急诊的过敏反应管理。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2011 Nov;22(7):708-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2011.01181.x. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
9
Use of epinephrine in emergency department depends on anaphylaxis severity in children.肾上腺素在急诊科的使用取决于儿童过敏反应的严重程度。
Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Jan;178(1):69-75. doi: 10.1007/s00431-018-3246-3. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
10
Predictors of Repeat Epinephrine Administration for Emergency Department Patients with Anaphylaxis.预测急诊过敏反应患者重复肾上腺素给药的因素。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015 Jul-Aug;3(4):576-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2015.04.009. Epub 2015 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Timing of repeat epinephrine to inform paediatric anaphylaxis observation periods: a retrospective cohort study.重复使用肾上腺素以确定儿童过敏反应观察期的时机:一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2025 Jul;9(7):484-496. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(25)00139-7.
2
Trends and Variation in Pediatric Anaphylaxis Care From 2016 to 2022.2016 年至 2022 年儿科过敏反应护理的趋势和变化。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Apr;11(4):1184-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.01.029. Epub 2023 Feb 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Persistent, refractory, and biphasic anaphylaxis: A multidisciplinary Delphi study.持续性、难治性和双相性过敏反应:一项多学科德尔菲研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Nov;146(5):1089-1096. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.08.015. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
2
Timing and predictors of repeat epinephrine administration among children hospitalized for anaphylaxis.因过敏反应住院儿童重复使用肾上腺素的时机及预测因素。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Apr;8(4):1400-1402.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.09.028. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
3
Trends in emergency care for anaphylaxis.过敏反应的急诊护理趋势。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Feb;8(2):767-768.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.07.018. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
4
Identification of children with anaphylaxis at low risk of receiving acute inpatient therapies.识别出低风险接受急性住院治疗的过敏反应儿童。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 7;14(2):e0211949. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211949. eCollection 2019.
5
Economic burden of food allergy: A systematic review.食物过敏的经济负担:系统评价。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019 Apr;122(4):373-380.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
6
Further Evaluation of Factors That May Predict Biphasic Reactions in Emergency Department Anaphylaxis Patients.进一步评估可能预测急诊科过敏反应患者双相反应的因素。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Sep-Oct;5(5):1295-1301. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.07.020.
7
Increasing Emergency Department Visits for Anaphylaxis, 2005-2014.2005 - 2014年因过敏反应导致的急诊科就诊人数增加
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Jan-Feb;5(1):171-175.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.08.013. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
8
Update on biphasic anaphylaxis.双相性过敏反应的最新进展。
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Aug;16(4):346-51. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000279.
9
Risk calculators-methods, development, implementation, and validation.风险计算器——方法、开发、实施与验证
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jun;31(6):1111-6. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2589-3. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
10
Variation and Trends in Anaphylaxis Care in United States Children's Hospitals.美国儿童医院过敏反应护理的变化与趋势
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 May;23(5):623-7. doi: 10.1111/acem.12922. Epub 2016 Apr 13.

PEMCRC 过敏反应研究方案:一项多中心队列研究,旨在为急诊科管理过敏反应儿童开发和验证临床决策模型。

PEMCRC anaphylaxis study protocol: a multicentre cohort study to derive and validate clinical decision models for the emergency department management of children with anaphylaxis.

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 5;11(1):e037341. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037341.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037341
PMID:33402402
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7786808/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There remain significant knowledge gaps about the management and outcomes of children with anaphylaxis. These gaps have led to practice variation regarding decisions to hospitalise children and length of observation periods following treatment with epinephrine. The objectives of this multicentre study are to (1) determine the prevalence of and risk factors for severe, persistent, refractory and biphasic anaphylaxis, as well as persistent and biphasic non-anaphylactic reactions; (2) derive and validate prediction models for emergency department (ED) discharge; and (3) determine data-driven lengths of ED and inpatient observation prior to discharge to home based on initial reaction severity.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The study is being conducted through the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Collaborative Research Committee (PEMCRC). Children 6 months to less than 18 years of age presenting to 30 participating EDs for anaphylaxis from October 2015 to December 2019 will be eligible. The primary outcomes for each objective are (1) severe, persistent, refractory or biphasic anaphylaxis, as well as persistent or biphasic non-anaphylactic reactions; (2) safe ED discharge, defined as no receipt of acute anaphylaxis medications or hypotension beyond 4 hours from first administered dose of epinephrine; and (3) time from first to last administered dose of epinephrine and vasopressor cessation. Analyses for each objective include (1) descriptive statistics to estimate prevalence and generalised estimating equations that will be used to investigate risk factors for anaphylaxis outcomes, (2) least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and binary recursive partitioning to derive and validate prediction models of children who may be candidates for safe ED discharge, and (3) Kaplan-Meier analyses to assess timing from first to last epinephrine doses and vasopressor cessation based on initial reaction severity.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

All sites will obtain institutional review board approval; results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated via traditional and social media, blogs and online education platforms.

摘要

简介

关于儿童过敏反应的管理和结局,仍存在着显著的知识空白。这些空白导致了在决定儿童住院治疗以及使用肾上腺素治疗后的观察期长短方面存在实践差异。本多中心研究的目的是:(1)确定严重、持续、难治性和双相过敏反应以及持续和双相非过敏反应的患病率和危险因素;(2)得出并验证基于急诊科(ED)出院的预测模型;(3)根据初始反应严重程度,确定在出院回家之前 ED 和住院观察的基于数据的时间。

方法和分析

该研究由儿科急诊医学合作研究委员会(PEMCRC)进行。2015 年 10 月至 2019 年 12 月期间,年龄在 6 个月至 18 岁以下,因过敏反应在 30 家参与的 ED 就诊的儿童将符合入选条件。每个目标的主要结果为:(1)严重、持续、难治性或双相过敏反应以及持续或双相非过敏反应;(2)安全 ED 出院,定义为无急性过敏反应药物的使用或在首次给予肾上腺素后 4 小时以上无低血压;以及(3)从首次到最后一次给予肾上腺素和血管加压药的时间。每个目标的分析包括:(1)描述性统计以估计患病率,广义估计方程将用于调查过敏反应结局的危险因素;(2)最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归和二叉递归分区,以得出和验证可能安全 ED 出院的儿童的预测模型;(3)基于初始反应严重程度,通过 Kaplan-Meier 分析评估从首次到最后一次给予肾上腺素剂量和血管加压药的时间。

伦理和传播

所有站点都将获得机构审查委员会的批准;研究结果将发表在同行评议的期刊上,并通过传统和社交媒体、博客和在线教育平台进行传播。