Suppr超能文献

PEMCRC 过敏反应研究方案:一项多中心队列研究,旨在为急诊科管理过敏反应儿童开发和验证临床决策模型。

PEMCRC anaphylaxis study protocol: a multicentre cohort study to derive and validate clinical decision models for the emergency department management of children with anaphylaxis.

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 5;11(1):e037341. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037341.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There remain significant knowledge gaps about the management and outcomes of children with anaphylaxis. These gaps have led to practice variation regarding decisions to hospitalise children and length of observation periods following treatment with epinephrine. The objectives of this multicentre study are to (1) determine the prevalence of and risk factors for severe, persistent, refractory and biphasic anaphylaxis, as well as persistent and biphasic non-anaphylactic reactions; (2) derive and validate prediction models for emergency department (ED) discharge; and (3) determine data-driven lengths of ED and inpatient observation prior to discharge to home based on initial reaction severity.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The study is being conducted through the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Collaborative Research Committee (PEMCRC). Children 6 months to less than 18 years of age presenting to 30 participating EDs for anaphylaxis from October 2015 to December 2019 will be eligible. The primary outcomes for each objective are (1) severe, persistent, refractory or biphasic anaphylaxis, as well as persistent or biphasic non-anaphylactic reactions; (2) safe ED discharge, defined as no receipt of acute anaphylaxis medications or hypotension beyond 4 hours from first administered dose of epinephrine; and (3) time from first to last administered dose of epinephrine and vasopressor cessation. Analyses for each objective include (1) descriptive statistics to estimate prevalence and generalised estimating equations that will be used to investigate risk factors for anaphylaxis outcomes, (2) least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and binary recursive partitioning to derive and validate prediction models of children who may be candidates for safe ED discharge, and (3) Kaplan-Meier analyses to assess timing from first to last epinephrine doses and vasopressor cessation based on initial reaction severity.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

All sites will obtain institutional review board approval; results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated via traditional and social media, blogs and online education platforms.

摘要

简介

关于儿童过敏反应的管理和结局,仍存在着显著的知识空白。这些空白导致了在决定儿童住院治疗以及使用肾上腺素治疗后的观察期长短方面存在实践差异。本多中心研究的目的是:(1)确定严重、持续、难治性和双相过敏反应以及持续和双相非过敏反应的患病率和危险因素;(2)得出并验证基于急诊科(ED)出院的预测模型;(3)根据初始反应严重程度,确定在出院回家之前 ED 和住院观察的基于数据的时间。

方法和分析

该研究由儿科急诊医学合作研究委员会(PEMCRC)进行。2015 年 10 月至 2019 年 12 月期间,年龄在 6 个月至 18 岁以下,因过敏反应在 30 家参与的 ED 就诊的儿童将符合入选条件。每个目标的主要结果为:(1)严重、持续、难治性或双相过敏反应以及持续或双相非过敏反应;(2)安全 ED 出院,定义为无急性过敏反应药物的使用或在首次给予肾上腺素后 4 小时以上无低血压;以及(3)从首次到最后一次给予肾上腺素和血管加压药的时间。每个目标的分析包括:(1)描述性统计以估计患病率,广义估计方程将用于调查过敏反应结局的危险因素;(2)最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归和二叉递归分区,以得出和验证可能安全 ED 出院的儿童的预测模型;(3)基于初始反应严重程度,通过 Kaplan-Meier 分析评估从首次到最后一次给予肾上腺素剂量和血管加压药的时间。

伦理和传播

所有站点都将获得机构审查委员会的批准;研究结果将发表在同行评议的期刊上,并通过传统和社交媒体、博客和在线教育平台进行传播。

相似文献

3
Epidemiology and clinical predictors of biphasic reactions in children with anaphylaxis.过敏反应儿童双相反应的流行病学及临床预测因素
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015 Sep;115(3):217-223.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2015.05.013. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
8
Improving anaphylaxis management in a pediatric emergency department.改善儿科急诊的过敏反应管理。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2011 Nov;22(7):708-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2011.01181.x. Epub 2011 Jun 15.

本文引用的文献

3
Trends in emergency care for anaphylaxis.过敏反应的急诊护理趋势。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Feb;8(2):767-768.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.07.018. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
5
Economic burden of food allergy: A systematic review.食物过敏的经济负担:系统评价。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2019 Apr;122(4):373-380.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
7
Increasing Emergency Department Visits for Anaphylaxis, 2005-2014.2005 - 2014年因过敏反应导致的急诊科就诊人数增加
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Jan-Feb;5(1):171-175.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.08.013. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
8
Update on biphasic anaphylaxis.双相性过敏反应的最新进展。
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Aug;16(4):346-51. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000279.
9
Risk calculators-methods, development, implementation, and validation.风险计算器——方法、开发、实施与验证
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jun;31(6):1111-6. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2589-3. Epub 2016 Apr 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验